I'm not sure what you are saying. I did not bring up Minsk - I brought up BM as the underlying organizer
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...otically-narcissistic-oblivious-moron/page282
the we are the signatories -although to be honest I wasn't sure if NATO countries. signed or not..
I fail to see how this was about organizing Russia or some Tavvyish silliness.. why would I say anything about "organizing Russia"??
I don't know, having seen the exchange, your interpretation is conclusive. Yeah, he said "we", referring to an agreement that included the U.S. as a contracting party. To me that sounds legit from a U.S. perspective.
I'm not sure what you are saying. I did not bring up Minsk - I brought up BM as the underlying organizer
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...otically-narcissistic-oblivious-moron/page282
[...] why would I say anything about "organizing Russia"??
more imported intellectuals
Seriously this arsehole is like Rune on steroids, just ignore the cunt!
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Why would you, indeed? Look, "we organized" is at the very least ambiguous, as it might imply Russia and the former USSR satellite states. Any ambiguity may legitimately be construed against the author; so if you are being beaten up for your ambiguous language, you got to take it. Had you clearly thought, you'd have said "We were one of the signatory states." As usual, not paying attention to language has her turning around and bite you in the behind.
you were pwnd. you can hang onto that life line if it makes you feel better.
tells me you at least were no victims of mods (lib/cons or otherwise) petty bureaucracy.
You have been informed this is not a heavily modded, or unfairly modded board, yet you feel the need to screech about a clarification with no penalty
Get over yourself. you are not special or unique. this place function fine with or without you.
I have been on more then a few boards that were Nazi-like enforcers of ideological bias, or simple paranoia rule making.
Generally you put into this place what you want to, and take what you want from it.
Serious discussions/formal debate/partisan bleating or your choice without being hassled
I'm not sure what you are saying. I did not bring up Minsk - I brought up BM as the underlying organizer
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...otically-narcissistic-oblivious-moron/page282
the we are the signatories -although to be honest I wasn't sure if NATO countries. signed or not..
I fail to see how this was about organizing Russia or some Tavvyish silliness.. why would I say anything about "organizing Russia"??
Seriously this arsehole is like Rune on steroids, just ignore the cunt! I said from the outset that he is a nasty piece of work and time has only solidified that belief. He has his own entourage of sycophants that serve only to attend to his needs. I have him on ignore and will never respond to anything he says or indeed his fellow circle jerkers. You should have a look over at USMB, they all seem like pretty good people so far at least.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Here comes JPP's answer to the pilot fish feeding off parasites from the bigger denizens of the deep.Fuck you, you never pwned anyone or anything in your life
There was no "US as a contracting party" in the re-organization of the collapsed Soviet Union. I don't think that you would have described what happened in Russia in terms of a "we" having done it.
it was in context of me talking about the B.Memorandum.Why would you, indeed? Look, "we organized" is at the very least ambiguous, as it might imply Russia and the former USSR satellite states. Any ambiguity may legitimately be construed against the author; so if you are being beaten up for your ambiguous language, you got to take it. Had you clearly thought, you'd have said "We were one of the signatory states." As usual, not paying attention to language has her turn around and bite you in the behind.