Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
Jury found Trump guilty
Trump not guilty of rape
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
Jury found Trump guilty
There was no evidence just 3 women that rehearsed their stories
Not of rape. Defamation of character and battery
Wow. You going into full on personal attack mode and bringing in family not mentioned here tells me you are embarrased about something you've said or done. What embarrassed you most about what you said that made it so you wanted to throw your own poop at someone else to see if it would stick?
The only person here, in this post, talking about voting for such a person is you. I did notice you did admit he was "acquitted" of rape in this "rape trial". You just had to try to spit some of that crow onto my plate where you know it doesn't belong.
Last edited:
christiefan915
Catalyst
Let's see, Paula Jones had her day in court and came up a winner. We're still waiting for Tara Reade to take the next step. I for one would welcome her testimony under oath.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Agreed. IMO, Legion is just looking for an excuse to rape women and/or grab their genitals.
I’m not the one who voted for the sexual abuser, I believe, and calling people out for that type of shit.
I believe Paula Jones, and Jean Carroll.
Paula Jones and Tara Reid never claimed they were raped.
Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
Exactly Trump found guilty of crimes
No, you would not. Her story changed many times. She would embarrass anyone with firing neurons. She would get laughed out of court and your constant false analogies would disappear.
Um... Yes you did. Even one that lost a lawsuit, well one that (using your standards of it being a "rape trial") plead guilty. You even voted for him twice. Do you not remember history? One who was even impeached for lying in court about sexual harassment in the workplace.
My guess is your shame must come from the fact that you know that no matter what someone who wears the same color political jersey you wear says or does you will vote for them, and you know that I would not, shoot, I had already noted that I would not vote for Trump long before this "rape trial" that (using your standards of "rape trial") acquitted President Trump.
You don't have to live up to my standards, Jarod. Though, to avoid the hypocrisy label, you should try to live up to the standards you say others should live up to, pretending they don't when you are ashamed you would not...
If you are referring to Bill Clinton, he settled a lawsuit for sexual harassment, not sexual abuse. Very significant difference.
At the times I voted for him I believed him to be innocent.
You voted for Trump after his own words about grabbing them by the pussy and after knowing about his two divorces, child born while he was married to another woman, and brutally sexually discussing comments about women in general.
Bill Clinton (clearly not perfect, had one wife, and children with one woman who he supported emotionally and professionally) promoted the cause of women’s rights, Trump fought against them.
A father of daughters should be very ashamed to have voted for Trump knowing those things.
Indeed, a father of daughters should be ashamed they voted for Clinton knowing the things he has done as well. When the choice is a person who supported someone who did that to women and who committed crimes for which I would never have gotten the pass she did, or someone who said stupid crap about women I will continue to hold my nose and vote for the person who just says stupid things if their policy is better than the other.
What I know about the differences between you and me: I decided to change my future actions after I had new information, you did not. You continuously argued how much the new information didn't matter to you. Now, follow your own advice, maybe you can tell Biden to support his genetic family and make them feel seen rather than pretend to support someone that is a random stranger to pander to his "new" base.
BartenderElite
Verified User
It goes both ways.
In the '90's, a consensual affair was a pearl clutcher for conservatives. It made Clinton "not fit for office."
Now, it's pretty much "hush money to a porn star? Sexual battery - but not rape? When can I vote?"
Conservatives are bigger hypocrites here. I wouldn't vote for Clinton again.
BartenderElite
Verified User
Let's not forget: the standards were established by conservatives. There are thousands of quotes we could cite here from the '90s - literally thousands. Clinton was not fit for office, unPresidential, depraved, a "scumbag," morally bankrupt, a terrible role model, et al.
They have done a COMPLETE about-face. It couldn't possibly be more hypocritical. It is shameless, on every level.
They have done a COMPLETE about-face. It couldn't possibly be more hypocritical. It is shameless, on every level.
I do not understand your last sentence.
When I voted for Bill Clinton, both times, I did not know who Monica Lewinsky was and Paula Jones was a he said she said situation.
I thought Clinton was a good president. He understood how to work with republicans.
And when I voted for Trump I knew that HillBillary had broken the law in a way that would have burned me for life and gotten away with it, while all I knew about Trump was that he said stupid things and was going to appoint SCOTUS justices I supported. Yeah... good times.
However, when you voted for HillBillary Clinton, you knew that she knew Bill treated interns to his special sauce (sexual harassment) all over their dresses and supported him wholeheartedly anyway, that she told you to believe women, except those who Bill raped (yeah, accusations you know, believe them she says, unless it is a democrat, and more specifically Bill)...
Yeah, good times. You also knew that she broke the law and that Comey's statement that nobody would ever prosecute anyone for that crime was absurd. But none of that mattered to you. That she enabled a sexual predator, just skipped right on past that, that she deliberately broke the law endangering American HUMINT agents around the globe, skipped right on past that.
Pretending that you have some sort of moral authority here is preposterous. There is nothing ever that any democrat has done that you have suggested even made them slightly unfit for office, shoot you have never said that you wouldn't vote for them during any campaign ever. You cannot say the same about me and republicans. Well, you could, but you would be lying, you would know you were lying, and it would be deliberate falsehood. You sir, are a hypocrite at the sublime level of Master.
You are wrong about what I knew and did and why.
I guess I struck a nerve. I can tell you are ashamed and I understand why.
You pretend Hillary said things she did not because of your blind hate for her.
LOL (really, actually out loud. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, label me flattered). Whatever makes you feel better about yourself, have at it. Maybe the next time you try to bring my daughters who are not part of a conversation into an argument in an appeal to emotion, you can be a bit less hypocritical and you may not feel like poo afterward. You didn't get far enough from my original post to repeat it here with any effect. Someday, you may be able to think well enough of yourself that you can come up with something good that I didn't type first....