Trump Melts Down at Being Fact-Checked Right to His Face [wrongly deported dad]

LichGold said:
OLD on his head being slammed while being ass-raped in prison. Sicko.
Click to expand...
Does this bring back memories, Convict?

9sq5m3.jpg
 
Tobytone said:
I saw a documentary where soldiers in Afghanistan hunted Taliban, helped villages rebuild, and got farmers to snitch on bad guys. They’d find poppy fields, question farmers, often paying for intel or helping in trade.
Click to expand...
Yep. In Afghanistan, it's a world apart, comprised of different clans who all hate and distrust each other, and each clan is broken down into different tribes who are distrustful of each other, and each tribe is broken down into families and family lines, each distrusting the others. When the US arrived, all the Afghans wanted to know is "Whose side are they on?" When the US would approach a tribe offering $$ by the truckload if they would snitch on other tribes, or better yet, on other clans, the reaction was "You're damn right we'll help you out! (just don't be looking in the general direction of our women)" The common misconception that the "Afghans" were somehow all united and HATED US personnel was very erroneous. One way to get a village to absolutely love you was to bring a few cases of bottled water to them and just join them for chai.

Tobytone said:
The Taliban forced harsh poppy quotas on these farmers, killing entire families if they failed.
Click to expand...
Correct. This is where the misconception of the suicide bomber gets demystified. Many westerners think that Afghans have nothing better to do than to strap on explosives and to detonate themselves in public places. None suicide bomber does so willingly, i.e. they are all coerced. They are all family men who love their families, and who never want to see anything happen to any of them; nonetheless, one day they return home to find that the Taliban has kidnapped the entire family. The Taliban then gives them two options: the family can be tortured to death, or you can detonate yourself where we need, and we'll take care of your family for the rest of their lives. Everyone eventually accedes, they are provided explosive vests, taught how to use them and are then filled with a heavy dose of powerful drugs to maintain the courage and the will.

Tobytone said:
Torching fields could get a village slaughtered, so soldiers held back to protect innocents stuck between growing poppies or dying.
Click to expand...
The US was more interested in closing out the bosses and the warlords running the overall business. Soldiers would have the farmers point them out. The US offered protection and the Afghan peasants provided invaluable intel.
 
IBDaMann said:
Yep. In Afghanistan, it's a world apart, comprised of different clans who all hate and distrust each other, and each clan is broken down into different tribes who are distrustful of each other, and each tribe is broken down into families and family lines, each distrusting the others. When the US arrived, all the Afghans wanted to know is "Whose side are they on?" When the US would approach a tribe offering $$ by the truckload if they would snitch on other tribes, or better yet, on other clans, the reaction was "You're damn right we'll help you out! (just don't be looking in the general direction of our women)" The common misconception that the "Afghans" were somehow all united and HATED US personnel was very erroneous. One way to get a village to absolutely love you was to bring a few cases of bottled water to them and just join them for chai.


Correct. This is where the misconception of the suicide bomber gets demystified. Many westerners think that Afghans have nothing better to do than to strap on explosives and to detonate themselves in public places. None suicide bomber does so willingly, i.e. they are all coerced. They are all family men who love their families, and who never want to see anything happen to any of them; nonetheless, one day they return home to find that the Taliban has kidnapped the entire family. The Taliban then gives them two options: the family can be tortured to death, or you can detonate yourself where we need, and we'll take care of your family for the rest of their lives. Everyone eventually accedes, they are provided explosive vests, taught how to use them and are then filled with a heavy dose of powerful drugs to maintain the courage and the will.


The US was more interested in closing out the bosses and the warlords running the overall business. Soldiers would have the farmers point them out. The US offered protection and the Afghan peasants provided invaluable intel.
Click to expand...
What's really disgusting, the media knew all of this, yet their reporting suggested a completely different narrative.
 
LichGold said:
But you're all so thrilled with finally not being chopped to bits by eachother while still being able to say "fagot" in front of eachother. We both know it's what you want to say when you say magats. You must be tired by now with being shoved up each other's asses. Well not "uncle" but im sure the point is sound other than that.
Click to expand...
Note that Repubs keep talking about lefty things being jammed down their throats. The imagery is obvious. They have been doing it for years. It seems like a wish list.
 
Nordberg said:
Note that Repubs keep talking about lefty things being jammed down their throats. The imagery is obvious. They have been doing it for years. It seems like a wish list.
Click to expand...
Oh you're taking exception... Seemed to me yall liked that sort of thing. I'll just go back to the same word then. Im sure that's much less offensive and thx for confirming that it is.

GibgGJIXEAA1kxf (1).jpeg
GibgGJIXEAA1kxf (1).jpeg
 
LichGold said:
Oh you're taking exception... Seemed to me yall liked that sort of thing. I'll just go back to the same word then. Im sure that's much less offensive and thx for confirming that it is.
Click to expand...
Question : why are you constantly posting about gay sex and posting pictures of grown men with children in their underwear?
 
Magats_Love_NHB said:
pictures of grown men with children in their underwear?
Click to expand...
Cite or didn't happen
or did you mean this?
Because it pretty well frames the shit the filthy NAMBLAcrats ignore about a presidential candidate that they fraudulently installed. You might remember him. his name was joebama.

Note, the picture has some words on it. Did you ever read them or are you just being all faggoty again.

GlRkP4MXkAArvgx.jpeg
 
Magats_Love_NHB said:
Yes, I mean the pictures that could be seen as kid porn. This is typically frowned upon on most online forums.

Hello @FBI!
Click to expand...
So you admit this picture is very embarrassing to the democrats whose watch it was when they sprouted from the woodwork all over the world due to similarly overlooked heroin floods. And go figure the two things are directly connected.... It's as if it was all planned in 1998 under the clinton administration by condolezza rice some time near August....

Yaknow, or something....

GlRmL_sa0AAi0uw.jpeg
 
LichGold said:
So you admit this picture is very embarrassing to the democrats whose watch it was when they sprouted from the woodwork all over the world due to similarly overlooked heroin floods. And go figure the two things are directly connected.... It's as if it was all planned in 1998 under the clinton administration by condolezza rice some time near August....

Yaknow, or something....

View attachment 49590
Click to expand...
If you made any sense I'd try to respond but alas..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top