You have posted claims, but somehow those claims do not translate into evidence that can be presented in courts of law. Courts do not accept anonymous conspiracy blogs.
Trump melts down as Fox News ignores him, features GOP voters ditching MAGAworld
- Thread starter Joe Capitalist
- Start date
You have posted claims, but somehow those claims do not translate into evidence that can be presented in courts of law. Courts do not accept anonymous conspiracy blogs.
Are you saying it wasn't a hoot when Tucker talked about ball tanning to increase masculinity?
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
You got no evidence dude. Just a bunch of silly conspiracy theories. And just because you're native and gullible enough to believe them, that doesn't make them true.
No evidence = No election fraud
I rest my case
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
The Testicle Tanning was a good one. Almost as good as 2000 Mules. But the far right media threw them against the wall but they didn't stick.
I wonder what bullshit the far right media will throw against the wall next.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Continuing to ignore the evidence, I see...
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Ignoring the evidence doesn't make it go away, dude.
You claim you have evidence, which you do not present in court. So, why are you ignoring this evidence?
MAGAworld is going away. CPAC was a huge fail. Did you see the guest list? They few an authoritarian dictator in to bash LGBTQ. These guys are maniacs!
BartenderElite
Verified User
Just like the "RINO" stuff. The only gauge - let me repeat: the ONLY gauge - is blind loyalty to Trump.
Says the guy that continues to try to tell us that "masks don't work." Talk about someone ignoring evidence.
The chance of a mask stopping a virus (80-95%) is greater than the chance (0.00001%) that there was enough fraud in the last election to cause a different outcome.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Yeah, the CPAC convention just highlighted the radical, extremism of today's RepubliQan Party. It's sickening. Both my parents were members of the Republican Party in the 60s, 70s and 80s but today's RepubliQan party is completely different. Disgraceful.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
I have presented it to you (and others). You choose to remain in denial instead.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Masks don't work when it comes to stopping or preventing the spread of viruses.
No. You are ignoring science, mathematics, and engineering specs.
Completely made up numbers.
A virus is roughly 0.1 microns in diameter (it can be much smaller, it can be slightly bigger), but for sake of discussion I will refer to a specific virus that is 0.1 microns in diameter.
The pores of a mask vary in size depending on the type of mask worn. The most common mask that I see worn around has a pore size of roughly 3 microns (or more).
0.1 microns x30 = 3 microns... so that's a difference of 30x.
A mosquito is roughly 0.25" in size. 0.25" x30 = 7.5"...
Would you erect a mosquito net around your deck that has roughly 7.5" pores and expect it to keep out any mosquitos?
That's similar to what you are doing when you think that a common paper mask can somehow keep out a virus...
Congratulations on proving to us you don't follow the science.
https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/...e-masks-disinfection-methods-against-covid-19
You have failed to account for impaction, diffusion, and interception in your claim about how filters work.
Then your attempt to provide an example fails to closely resemble how a mask actually works. Masks have layers. Viruses and airborne particles don't have wings to change direction.
https://learnmetrics.com/hepa-filters/
But let's look at some actual science....
The science says that a paper mask would block about 70% of the viruses you claim they can't stop at all. But keep on denying the science all you want to. It only shows you much of an idiot you really are.
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Congratulations on proving to us that you ignore science, mathematics, and engineering specs.
The EPA is not science, mathematics, or engineering specs.... dumbass...
Splendid. Make your point about how I am in error. The floor is yours...
Fair enough. Erect a tri-layered mosquito net (with 7.5" pores) around the deck. It won't make a difference. Mosquitos will still get through.
Meh. Release a bunch of mosquitos into the air during any fair bit of wind and they will go wherever the wind takes them. Many of them will end up going right through the huge 7.5" gaping pores of the netting.
Mmmmmmm HOLY LINK!!!!! Dismissed.
This is not science.But let's look at some actual science....
Made up number. A paper mask cannot stop a virus. Its pores are far too large and the virus is far too small. You continue to believe that erecting a tri-layered mosquito net with 7.5" pores around your deck can somehow stop mosquitoes that are a quarter of an inch in size from being blown into or otherwise entering into your deck area.
Your issue, not mine.
If you have this evidence, why are you hiding it from the courts?
gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Why are you so obsessed with courts viewing it? The evidence exists, whether or not a court views it.
I tell you what gfm. To prove that impaction works I will make a bet with you. I will give you a marshmallow gun that can fire 40 feet with 100 small marshmallows about 1/2" in size. Then I will construct a 'mask' using 3 layers of chain link fence with the fences 2" apart.. All the holes will be 1-7/8" or larger. Then you stand 5' away from the first fence. I will give you $50 for every marshmallow you get through the 3 fences. You will give me $15 for every one you don't get through all three fences. Are you willing to take the bet? If you are correct, it should be an easy $5,000 for you. If I am correct, I will make at most $1,500. But based on the way impaction works, you will lucky get about 12% of the marshmallows through the 3 fences. This is simple physics that you seem to want to deny.
It's funny how you claim holy link and claim the science the EPA publishes isn't science while continuing to rely on your non-scientific nonsense that fails to take into account the 3 ways that filters actually work. So where is your science? Where is your engineering? Where is your mathematics? Your idiotic claims aren't evidence of anything other than your idiocy. If you think the studies referenced by the EPA are wrong as to how filtering works then you should be showing us how it is wrong instead of just using a logical fallacy to discount it. The fact that you can't dispute impaction, diffusion, or interception speaks volumes as to what science you are relying on. You are like a three year old who can't understand that objects in motion require a force to change direction. And we haven't even gotten to brownian motion yet.
You really should stop using the same verbiage as your sock if you don't want to be accused of being a sock.
Let me make a net that looks like this with the average size opening at 7.5" and then blow mosquitos at it at 100 miles an hour and I'll bet it blocks about 50% of them because they will impact the fibers in the 'mask'. Of course to be comparable the mosquitos would need to be blown at this 'mask' at about 6,000 mph to scale from 30 microns to 7.5" if we wanted to use your claims that things can simply scale up for comparison.
The evidence exists but you just can't show it to a court?
Yeah.. that sounds like a three year old. I have it but I can't show it to you. You just have to take my word for it.