Trump Lied? Nope, Illegal Alien Convicted of Voting Five Times

Taft2016

Verified User
DO #9

a) Good question.

b) Who knows?

c) Let's not overlook the value of your sensible question.

The types of voter ID requirements Republicans tend to advocate are widely believed to impinge on voters that vote Democrat.
Thus, the Republicans seem more interested in winning elections than earning political victories.
Trump lost the vote in 2016, as did Bush in Y2K.

If Republicans were interested in vote integrity, now that they control the exec & both houses of congress,
why don't Republicans simply pass a law that no vote machine or ballot counting device shall ever have any access to the Internet?

It's so EXQUISITELY simple, why have they not lunged at this obvious solution? Could it be because vote integrity isn't really their agenda?

Ockham's Razor, what else could it be?
 
DO #9

a) Good question.

b) Who knows?

c) Let's not overlook the value of your sensible question.

The types of voter ID requirements Republicans tend to advocate are widely believed to impinge on voters that vote Democrat.
Thus, the Republicans seem more interested in winning elections than earning political victories.
Trump lost the vote in 2016, as did Bush in Y2K.

If Republicans were interested in vote integrity, now that they control the exec & both houses of congress,
why don't Republicans simply pass a law that no vote machine or ballot counting device shall ever have any access to the Internet?

It's so EXQUISITELY simple, why have they not lunged at this obvious solution? Could it be because vote integrity isn't really their agenda?

Ockham's Razor, what else could it be?

I don't know that voting machines are connected to the net. If they are its malicious stupidity and it should be made illegal.

Republicans should pass national voter ID law while they have the power to. Democrats have opposed that in the past. And in invoking the Razor I'm forced to conclude it's because they don't really want fair elections.
 
DO #11

This is the United States of America. Stupidity is our specialty.

You've heard the rumors and suspicions about Putin hacking our election.

That's but one way to do it.

Not only that, a reported ~20% of our vote machines don't even have an audit trail. Diebold may make some or all of those.

Internet access simplifies both ballot configuration / standardization, and vote tallying and reporting.

But considering the U.S. federal budget, the nominal cost of cutting the wire would seem to be $money well spent.
malicious stupidity
Never ascribe to malice what simple stupidity will explain.
 
DO #11

This is the United States of America. Stupidity is our specialty.

You've heard the rumors and suspicions about Putin hacking our election.

That's but one way to do it.

Not only that, a reported ~20% of our vote machines don't even have an audit trail. Diebold may make some or all of those.

Internet access simplifies both ballot configuration / standardization, and vote tallying and reporting.

But considering the U.S. federal budget, the nominal cost of cutting the wire would seem to be $money well spent.

Never ascribe to malice what simple stupidity will explain.

Ok, let's do it lol.

I'd take a 100% fair and accurate election and run with it. I have a strong suspicion the democrats want no such thing.
 
Didn't tweety say 3-5 million illegals voted?

1 woman, 3-5 million. I guess that's pretty close.

Brilliant conclusion.

Two people were arrested last night in New York City for possession of heroin.

Therefore we can conclude that out of New York's population of 8 million, only two people use heroin.

So hey, it's not really a problem.
 
"I'd take a 100% fair and accurate election and run with it. I have a strong suspicion the democrats want no such thing." DO #13

a) Were it not for the electoral college jiggering the vote, what Republican would have been elected president in the new millennium?
- Bush lost the vote in Y2K.
- Trump lost the vote in 2016.

b) It's Republicans, not Democrats that advocate onerous additional hurdles for ballot access.

Therefore I agree there is a partisan bias about it. But it seems to me you have the bias backward.
 
Back
Top