You don't know her motive for giving the finger. But would you agree that giving the poster instead of the post a finger is an abuse of the reaction score system.The finger was given to Life is Golden, those two don’t get along. I know she condemns violence, is why I am sticking up for her.
Repugnant, reprehensible, inexcusable.No, it doesn’t. Her post on the matter shows her true feelings.
It certainly would seem to be so.The most recent posts condemn Charlie not his killer....
Yep, this is who they are. They will kill to silence dissenters.That foul cunt actually gave you the finger because the assassin was caught?
Leftists are pure evil. @ThatOwlWoman you are reprehensible and repugnant.
Alleged.It certainly does anyone that would be moved to give an obscene hand gesture to a post announcing the murder of a horrible murder is a pathetic excuse for a human being. Kirk was a father of two and everyone should be glad that his murder is in custody.
I’ll let Owl comment on her motive, but she has posted she does not support violence, so you’re wrong about her.You don't know her motive for giving the finger. But would you agree that giving the poster instead of the post a finger is an abuse of the reaction score system.
The finger is her reaction to the posts. She is JPP's new Evince. She is a Foul Woman.Repugnant, reprehensible, inexcusable.
Consider the source. Pure trash.It certainly does anyone that would be moved to give an obscene hand gesture to a post announcing the murder of a horrible murder is a pathetic excuse for a human being. Kirk was a father of two and everyone should be glad that his murder is in custody.
I don't even post here.The finger was given to Life is Golden, those two don’t get along. I know she condemns violence, is why I am sticking up for her.
Yes. But it is a safe bet he did it.Alleged.
So what is this?I don't even post here.
It is so...It certainly would seem to be so.
That's true...Alleged.
So how about she ACTUALLY likes a post that announces Kirk's murder is not circulating in the public.I’ll let Owl comment on her motive, but she has posted she does not support violence, so you’re wrong about her.
How can one abuse the reaction score? Are there rules of which Im not aware?So how about she ACTUALLY likes a post that announces Kirk's murder is not circulating in the public.
So if she gave the finger to the poster rather than the post is she abusing the reaction score system Ms Moderator?
So it is a reaction to the post correct?How can one abuse the reaction score? Are there rules of which Im not aware?
You are proud of your holding the reaction score record.You can't
Be serious about abusing the reactions score![]()