Trump Jr did nothing wrong says democrat law professor Alan Dershewitz

GazzaQueen said:
Now that your collusion narrative frenzy has been undermined, we can all admit The Imperial Don won fair and square. Junior rejected the Russian advances and you lose yet again.
Click to expand...

"I love it."

He was desperate for some dirt. All of the stuff he called "phony" and "disgusting" is exactly what they were doing.

What a "win". Like I said: your standards are down to nothing at this point.
 
Sailor said:
You have yet to make a point worth addressing.
Click to expand...

My points have been clear, concise and specific. That an illiterate fuck like you is unable to comprehend straightforward English is on you, halfwit. But the again, that New England gibberish really isn't English.
 
Thing1 said:
"I love it."

He was desperate for some dirt. All of the stuff he called "phony" and "disgusting" is exactly what they were doing.

What a "win". Like I said: your standards are down to nothing at this point.
Click to expand...

No collusion. You said so yourself.

Winning is not at all tiring.
 
Thing1 said:
"I love it."

He was desperate for some dirt. All of the stuff he called "phony" and "disgusting" is exactly what they were doing.

What a "win". Like I said: your standards are down to nothing at this point.
Click to expand...

I was listening to a university law professor just a few minutes ago. Said the exact things I but the have been claiming about the specific FEC code. But she said something more interesting. She said Junior may not be guilty of treason, but certainly of treachery.

Junior was willing and anxious to be beholding to a foreign government, Russia no less, to take action in order to get his dad into office. TREACHERY
 
domer76 said:
My points have been clear, concise and specific. That an illiterate fuck like you is unable to comprehend straightforward English is on you, halfwit. But the again, that New England gibberish really isn't English.
Click to expand...

Not sure what kind of drugs you are on, but get off them quick.
 
domer76 said:
I was listening to a university law professor just a few minutes ago. Said the exact things I but the have been claiming about the specific FEC code. But she said something more interesting. She said Junior may not be guilty of treason, but certainly of treachery.

Junior was willing and anxious to be beholding to a foreign government, Russia no less, to take action in order to get his dad into office. TREACHERY
Click to expand...

Eavesdropping while mopping the floors huh? TREACHERY! THIS IS IT! REALLY!!
 
GazzaQueen said:
Oh, I thought Junior rejected the offer of collusion. Are you saying he accepted it now?
Click to expand...

The "offer of collusion?"

You guys have been spinning so much that you're all dizzy & lost. Accepting the meeting based on the communication outlined in the email - and inviting 2 members of the campaign - was collusion.

But, thanks for admitting that you lied about what I said. That means a lot.
 
domer76 said:
I was listening to a university law professor just a few minutes ago. Said the exact things I but the have been claiming about the specific FEC code. But she said something more interesting. She said Junior may not be guilty of treason, but certainly of treachery.

Junior was willing and anxious to be beholding to a foreign government, Russia no less, to take action in order to get his dad into office. TREACHERY
Click to expand...

election tampering
 
Thing1 said:
The "offer of collusion?"

You guys have been spinning so much that you're all dizzy & lost. Accepting the meeting based on the communication outlined in the email - and inviting 2 members of the campaign - was collusion.

But, thanks for admitting that you lied about what I said. That means a lot.
Click to expand...
Your own story ends with Junior rejecting collusion.

No collusion, The Imperial Don wins fair and square.

We were right all along again. :)
 
Sailor said:
Not sure what has to do with you bullshitting about $300 bottles of wine, however, pertinent to this discussion there is not one of those real attorneys in that article that say Trump Jr / Trump/ the WH is guilty of anything. That is why they are real attorneys. Not enough evidence, just plenty of innuendo.
Click to expand...

Bullshitting? That was self deprecation if anything. Why I have not dined at the French Laundry in about 25 years! Back when it was cool.
 
blackascoal said:
Alan Dershowitz is a republican shill .. and everybody who knows anything about that asshole knows that.
Click to expand...

Ever since Bob Woodward wrote Plan of Attack, criticizing Bush and Iraq, much of his criticisms have been of the left. Does that now make him a Republican plant?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top