Brainless dotard doesn't know what oligarchy means.
Trump Jr. Admits His Dad Has Destroyed the Republican Party
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Brainless dotard doesn't know what oligarchy means.
![img]](https://media.tenor.com/XpRVuVoWi5YAAAAM/haha.gif]/img])
Lie, lame and stupid. Meanwhile, Democrats have turned their backs on America, defend illegal criminal aliens, drug runners from Venezuela, criminals, and Fascistic lawfare.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
problem is Democrats are not even in the news cycle anymore. except The Minnesota Dems stealing 8 billion$.
that actually sucks for you dummies.
That’s easy, the traditional GOP party of Reagan was just about everything Trump’s GOP isn’t, beginning with principles and ethics, it least had a moral compass
Crepitus
Verified User
You can't possibly be related to me. I'm human.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Agreed. Those were the days when Republicans had a code of ethics and pushed national security and fiscal responsibility.
Trump is a complete reversal of those values; he gives away our nation's secrets for a price, gives his rich friends tax breaks while running up the national debt, committing murder against brown people both inside and outside the US and turning the WH into bastardization of Louis the XIV and Walmart.
He can't do this alone. He can only do it with the full support of the Republican Party.
Tobytone
Verified User
Oh my! That's a first. I have no problem defining Marxism, you dumbass. I've described it in detail many time here. I've given the definition and I and many others have shown examples when libtards promote Marxism through policies or proposals or just dumbass ideas. That said I'll end this with a reasonably detailed definition for you since you asked so nicely. I'll always take the time to define Marxism for those interested.
My question is, why are you triggered by the accusation? These days many 'brave' or maybe it's brazen libtards celebrate their Marxist beliefs openly, sort of, out of the closet. As I've mentioned several times here Professor Richard Wolff teaches young skulls full of mush Marxism in Ivy League Schools. (it's possible he's retired) You may be behind the curve a bit, but your party is fully on board, and you will go along or get lost going forward.
Here's my definition of Marxism in a sort of story format with bonus commentary, a bit more fun than the dictionary. Remember, you asked.
Marxism is basically this 19th-century grudge-fest cooked up by Karl Marx, where he whines that history is nothing but one big class war between the evil 'oppressors' (anyone who owns a business or works hard to get ahead) and the 'oppressed' (everyone else, supposedly). The grand plan? Smash capitalism through revolution, seize all private property, and hand everything over to a glorious 'workers' state' that promises equality but always ends up with a bunch of elites lording it over everyone in a totalitarian nightmare - because, surprise, power corrupts even the comrades. (Yes, even those as good as you.)
It's the ultimate envy-driven fantasy that ignores human nature, incentives, and the fact that free markets have lifted billions out of poverty while Marxist experiments racked up over 100 million bodies last century. Fast-forward to today, and you'll see its slimy cultural offshoot in stuff like DEI programs, where companies and schools obsess over dividing people by race and gender to 'equitably' redistribute jobs and opportunities - not based on merit, but on some woke quota system that punishes achievement and rewards victimhood, all while pretending it's about 'inclusion.' It's never going to take you to utopia, champ. That much is a Marxist guarantee.
Oh, here's the google definition: (as positive a definition as possible, ignores it's 100% failure rate)
Marxism is a socioeconomic analysis and political philosophy, developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, that critiques capitalism by focusing on class struggle between the bourgeoisie (owners) and proletariat (workers), viewing history as a series of economic conflicts leading toward a classless, communist society where the means of production are socially owned, aiming for worker self-emancipation from exploitation and alienation. It's a theory of historical change (historical materialism) driven by material conditions and economic forces, proposing that revolution will overthrow capitalism and establish socialism, then communism.
Tobytone
Verified User
As usual, Lurchy struggles to make sense. He uses the person McCain actually picked as a running mate to make the case for McCain's respect for the office. Lurchy talking shit out of both ends, as usual. Really good point Lurchy, everyone's better for reading that masterpiece, lol.
It makes it irrelevant.
Trump knew Epstein 40 years ago when he was a democrat. Then banished him when he found out what a scumbag he was. Obama didn't - he was communicating with Epstein until the day of Jeff's Clintoncide.
See, you Heinrich Himmler types claim that anyone who ever met Epstein is a pedophile. The hundreds and hundreds of democrats and Hollywood scum you try and cover up for. Trump had a picture with Epstein 40 years ago, so what? Oprah had one with Epstein - so she is a child molester - those are the Nazi rules you established.
Oh, I know, you demand that rules are only for Trump, the object of your insanity - but I don't accept your double standard. What's good for the American, is good for the democrat.
Oprah is a pedophile - PROVEN because she had her picture taken.
