Trump Jr. Admits His Dad Has Destroyed the Republican Party

ThatOwlWoman said:
Groups, organizations, parties born of negativity seldom last.
Click to expand...
Agreed. It's a question of how much damage they'll leave in their wake.

It's a lot harder and more costly to rebuild things than it was to tear them down, as Trump is proving with the East Wing.
 
LurchAddams said:
I recall too much hateful rhetoric, including liberal used of the word, "faggot" and "nigger".
Click to expand...
All JPP MAGAt Karen retards are guilty of being homophobic racists and misogynists.

ag1wut.jpg
 
LurchAddams said:
I'm not a shrinking violet, don't get me wrong but his frequent use of those words is so unnecessary.
Click to expand...
Agreed, but isn't it nice that the MAGAts feel some compelled to reveal their intelligence and education levels along with their "Christian spirit"? :thinking:
 
LurchAddams said:
That #3, "Ego signaling" describes @Hawkeye10 , IMO.
Click to expand...
I think it applies to both Hawkeye and Lil Matty. Matt wants me to be afraid that he knew some hackers' online handles in the 19-fucking-90s. Hawkeye wants us all to think he has a "well-cultivated grapevine" of insider information that makes him more "enlightened" than everyone else on JPP. They're both delusional losers.
 
Diesel said:
I think it applies to both Hawkeye and Lil Matty. Matt wants me to be afraid that he knew some hackers' online handles in the 19-fucking-90s. Hawkeye wants us all to think he has a "well-cultivated grapevine" of insider information that makes him more "enlightened" than everyone else on JPP. They're both delusional losers.
Click to expand...
...and alcoholics. Sad.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
...and alcoholics. Sad.
Click to expand...
There is probably some connection between the two. I think Hawkeye is impotent. The only harm he causes is to his family. He thinks he's in love with the Dog Hoarding Basic Bitch from Bexley. He doesn't have any grasp on reality whatsoever. Matt, on the other hand, consistently threatens other posters with physical harm, doxing, and online crime. He should be taken in for questioning because although tough talk might have had some effect in the 1950s, I have no problem using his words to have him arrested today.
 
Tobytone said:
Oh my! That's a first. I have no problem defining Marxism, you dumbass. I've described it in detail many time here. I've given the definition and I and many others have shown examples when libtards promote Marxism through policies or proposals or just dumbass ideas. That said I'll end this with a reasonably detailed definition for you since you asked so nicely. I'll always take the time to define Marxism for those interested.

My question is, why are you triggered by the accusation? These days many 'brave' or maybe it's brazen libtards celebrate their Marxist beliefs openly, sort of, out of the closet. As I've mentioned several times here Professor Richard Wolff teaches young skulls full of mush Marxism in Ivy League Schools. (it's possible he's retired) You may be behind the curve a bit, but your party is fully on board, and you will go along or get lost going forward.

Here's my definition of Marxism in a sort of story format with bonus commentary, a bit more fun than the dictionary. Remember, you asked.

Marxism is basically this 19th-century grudge-fest cooked up by Karl Marx, where he whines that history is nothing but one big class war between the evil 'oppressors' (anyone who owns a business or works hard to get ahead) and the 'oppressed' (everyone else, supposedly). The grand plan? Smash capitalism through revolution, seize all private property, and hand everything over to a glorious 'workers' state' that promises equality but always ends up with a bunch of elites lording it over everyone in a totalitarian nightmare - because, surprise, power corrupts even the comrades. (Yes, even those as good as you.)

It's the ultimate envy-driven fantasy that ignores human nature, incentives, and the fact that free markets have lifted billions out of poverty while Marxist experiments racked up over 100 million bodies last century. Fast-forward to today, and you'll see its slimy cultural offshoot in stuff like DEI programs, where companies and schools obsess over dividing people by race and gender to 'equitably' redistribute jobs and opportunities - not based on merit, but on some woke quota system that punishes achievement and rewards victimhood, all while pretending it's about 'inclusion.' It's never going to take you to utopia, champ. That much is a Marxist guarantee.

Oh, here's the google definition: (as positive a definition as possible, ignores it's 100% failure rate)

Marxism is a socioeconomic analysis and political philosophy, developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, that critiques capitalism by focusing on class struggle between the bourgeoisie (owners) and proletariat (workers), viewing history as a series of economic conflicts leading toward a classless, communist society where the means of production are socially owned, aiming for worker self-emancipation from exploitation and alienation. It's a theory of historical change (historical materialism) driven by material conditions and economic forces, proposing that revolution will overthrow capitalism and establish socialism, then communism.
Click to expand...
The leftists get angry because THEY have no knowledge of what they support. The hive programs the drones to bleat the party line. They have no ability to grasp what it means. They become angry that we Americans DO know what it means and can identify what they and their party are pimping.
 
Number Six said:
Oh bless your heart, you're like a broken record from 1945—still blaming everyone else for your own party's historical amnesia and moral bankruptcy. If irony were a currency, you'd be the Weimar Republic of hypocrisy. Try again when your insults rise above the intellectual depth of a Trotsky pamphlet left out in the rain.
Click to expand...

Got your ass kicked so badly yesterday that you had to change your name again, 12B?

ROFL

Such a clown.
 
Jarod said:
So The PP’s argument that we shouldn’t vote for Hillary because 40 years ago someone accused her husband of rape was stlly?
Click to expand...

We shouldn't vote for the pedo democrats because for 40 years they empowered a pedophile empire under Epstein that even your King, Obama bowed to.

Say, I saw Bernie Madoff on the Sunday talkies yesterday saying that if you communists seize power in the House in '26 that they should make Epstein's bitch Hakeem the speaker.

abcnews.go.com

Nancy Pelosi predicts Democrats win House in ‘26, reflects on career and Jan. 6 attack

With her nearly four-decade-long career in Washington set to end after the 119th Congress, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi sat down with ABC's Jonathan Karl for "This Week."
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
 
Matt Dillon said:
@Maze , I may put you on ignore for that stupid bot shit, seriously.
It's too repetitive. It was novel fer a minute, now it's getting old, k?
Perhaps you need to reread Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals". :dunno:
I know you done read 'em once.
:rolleyes:
Here it is just for you:
"7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news."
www.openculture.com

Saul Alinsky’s 13 Tried-and-True Rules for Creating Meaningful Social Change

Saul David Alinsky died 36 years before the election of Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton's first attempt for the presidency. But many feverish screeds on social media, talk radio, and YouTube might have made one think he lurked behind these politicians like Rasputin.
www.openculture.com www.openculture.com
Click to expand...


I think 12B - which again changed it's name due to the humiliation it has suffered, may actually be some sort of low level artificial stupidity system (ASS). Before the upgrade there was some sort of spambot - SaltyDancing or something - 12B may be version 2.0 of that virus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top