Trump Is Totally Ignorant Of The Constitution

Trump Is Totally Ignorant Of The Constitution. Trump is totally ignorant of everything (including good taste, decency and the truth) except the satisfaction of his own fat gut and his childish conceit.
 
Trump Is Totally Ignorant Of The Constitution. Trump is totally ignorant of everything (including good taste, decency and the truth) except the satisfaction of his own fat gut and his childish conceit.

And the humor of it is, he's been decided by the majority of the United States to be better than the bucktoothed bitch of Benghazi he opposed in the election, commie. What say ye about her?
 
And the humor of it is, he's been decided by the majority of the United States to be better than the bucktoothed bitch of Benghazi he opposed in the election, commie. What say ye about her?

Actually, no. The majority voted against this fat Hitler-imitation. And I do wish your Mommy would teach you something about politics, you squalid little McCarthyite shit.
 
I believe female Electors should get more Collegiate in their deliberations regarding their natural rights. Double jeopardy is unlawful.
 
Actually, no. The majority voted against this fat Hitler-imitation. And I do wish your Mommy would teach you something about politics, you squalid little McCarthyite shit.

Hey asshole commie, in America the majority of "THE STATES" decide who will be President not the fucking neo-commies in New York and California. You haven't a fucking clue about America's Constitution have you commie?
 
Trump is clueless about the Constitution. How many “Lovin Eyes” Republicans here can and will defend his total non-understanding of the fact that the American flag actually stands for the “right to burn the flag?” Why is he clueless that our military fights to defend the right to burn the flag?

Is Trump a Castro fan? What would happen to Trump if he burned a Cuban flag in Cuba? Does Trump intend to copy the Castro Cuban model for America? Why does Trump want to put people in jail for a year and revoke their citizenship for burning a piece of cloth that symbolizes the freedom to burn that very piece of cloth?


Why is Trump ignorant of the fact that a natural born American Citizen’s citizenship cannot be constitutionally revoked?

Do we have any laws regarding undermining the government or causing social unrest? Think carefully before you answer.
 
Hey asshole commie, in America the majority of "THE STATES" decide who will be President not the fucking neo-commies in New York and California. You haven't a fucking clue about America's Constitution have you commie?

You said 'the majority', you illiterate Nazi shit. Fuck off back to run Dachau, jackboots.
 
& you prove you're an asshole w/ almost everyone of your posts....:palm:

Someday you might be mature enough when you get out of your diapers to actually make a rational argument with one of my post commie.
 
Immigration into the Union is not a State concern since 1808,

We have laws regarding employment at will.

I think we need a Policy of Truth.
 
Immigration into the Union is not a State concern since 1808,

We have laws regarding employment at will.

I think we need a Policy of Truth.

Presenting the same argument that has been debunked by a presentation of testable, objective evidence...again, and again, does not make it any more truthful via prompting ad nauseam. Its called circular argumentation. Its a trait of the left that has no real evidence.
 
That is absolute nonsense.

Anyone who went to school learned abut the Constitution and it's amendments by 3rd grade.

This is elementary school civics, we're talking about, here.

I absolutely expect elected officials to understand the most-oft cited Amendment throughout our country's history- that'd be the 1st Amendment, as well as the rest of the Constitution.

If you don't know it, you shouldn't be governing by it.

YOU may be willing to make excuses for unqualified candidates & officials. I'm not.

Not anymore. :cof1:
 
Presenting the same argument that has been debunked by a presentation of testable, objective evidence...again, and again, does not make it any more truthful via prompting ad nauseam. Its called circular argumentation. Its a trait of the left that has no real evidence.

It hasn't been debunked. The right only claims it has been debunked, and then claims I am trolling for not resorting to fallacy.

Immigration into the Union is not a State concern since 1808,

We have laws regarding employment at will.

I think we need a Policy of Truth.

It is why no one takes the right seriously about economics or the law.
 
Back
Top