Trump is going to crush Super Tuesday

Thing1 said:
She's qualified and is a 'safe' pick in some ways, but she won't change anything. She doesn't have any innovative ideas on how to address our problems, and things like the debt are likely to get much worse if she is President (which, in turn, means she might not be so "safe" in the long run).

Trump is the opposite. He's going to wreck the whole house of cards and start again - in a way, I kind of get the appeal of that to some.

But he'd be a terrible Prez in so many ways. I'd really have to vote Hillary if he was the candidate, and I was determined to not vote for her this year. Kind of bums me out.
Click to expand...

I want someone to shake things up and promote some real change, HRC is not going to do that.

But, when the shake up happens, I do not want a morally depraved person at the helm. I think Trump is deranged and suffering from mental illness that creates the real possibility that he will not act rational when his ego conflicts with the nations best interest.

I am concerned about the same thing with HRC, but I think she will be checked by the long standing institutions of the establishment, whereas if Trump succeeds in shaking things up, he wont be.
 
Jarod said:
I have so say I am surprised by that, I would have guessed you would not be able to overcome Trump's moral shortcomings and would have found a third candidate to support.

I don't believe Damocles or CAW will follow suit. I do think PiMP will fall in line and vote for Trump. ILA swears he wont.
Click to expand...

Hillary has her own moral shortcomings that kind of evens them out in that regard, IMO.
 
Jarod said:
I want someone to shake things up and promote some real change, HRC is not going to do that.

But, when the shake up happens, I do not want a morally depraved person at the helm. I think Trump is deranged and suffering from mental illness that creates the real possibility that he will not act rational when his ego conflicts with the nations best interest.

I am concerned about the same thing with HRC, but I think she will be checked by the long standing institutions of the establishment, whereas if Trump succeeds in shaking things up, he wont be.
Click to expand...

That sort of sums it up for me. Hillary will be boring and won't fix much.

Trump is dangerous. Unpredictable & dangerous. He is not a mentally healthy individual.
 
Establishment said:
I don't know that Trump specifically doesn't like women. He's just a colossal douchebag, and it happens to be noticed more around women. Is Huckabee the only nice, genuine guy to have ever run behind a populist movement? I mean, I don't really know the personalities of Polk and Bryan, but Jackson, John Anderson, and Trump are/were serious fucking douchebags.
Click to expand...

Isn't his daughter running one or more of his businesses?
 
Northwestman said:
Isn't his daughter running one or more of his businesses?
Click to expand...

It's his daughter.

I'm no psychologist, but Trump has a pretty well-established set of views on women in general. I don't think there can be much question that he views them as objects who can lose value based on their looks.

He's really a classic mysoginist. It's going to be difficult for him campaigning against Hillary. He needs to be fairly careful about how he criticizes her, but as we know, he won't be.
 
Thing1 said:
It's his daughter.

I'm no psychologist, but Trump has a pretty well-established set of views on women in general. I don't think there can be much question that he views them as objects who can lose value based on their looks.

He's really a classic mysoginist. It's going to be difficult for him campaigning against Hillary. He needs to be fairly careful about how he criticizes her, but as we know, he won't be.
Click to expand...

If that is so, why is his daughter empowered? From what I see, he insults everyone equally. The left just gets into a tizzy when it is a woman. He is a total tool, but bashing him for that is just nonsense. Seems it would be more effective to tally up his lies and outlandish campaign promises.
 
Northwestman said:
If that is so, why is his daughter empowered? From what I see, he insults everyone equally. The left just gets into a tizzy when it is a woman. He is a total tool, but bashing him for that is just nonsense. Seems it would be more effective to tally up his lies and outlandish campaign promises.
Click to expand...

Look, I have no problem whatsoever "getting in a tizzy" when Trump implies that a woman who asked him a tough question is menstruating, or implies a female GOP candidate shouldn't be President because of her face, or trying to say that the only way a woman could do well as a Presidential candidate is because of her gender.

Women are objects to him. He's not a complete idiot - he knows he can't run a business in 2016 America without women being in higher positions. But his mentality about them is strictly old school.
 
Thing1 said:
Look, I have no problem whatsoever "getting in a tizzy" when Trump implies that a woman who asked him a tough question is menstruating, or implies a female GOP candidate shouldn't be President because of her face, or trying to say that the only way a woman could do well as a Presidential candidate is because of her gender.

Women are objects to him. He's not a complete idiot - he knows he can't run a business in 2016 America without women being in higher positions. But his mentality about them is strictly old school.
Click to expand...

He's classic, no problem with women who are under his control. I would not be surprised by a woman VP choice, as long as she agreed to be submissive.
 
Thing1 said:
Look, I have no problem whatsoever "getting in a tizzy" when Trump implies that a woman who asked him a tough question is menstruating, or implies a female GOP candidate shouldn't be President because of her face, or trying to say that the only way a woman could do well as a Presidential candidate is because of her gender.

Women are objects to him. He's not a complete idiot - he knows he can't run a business in 2016 America without women being in higher positions. But his mentality about them is strictly old school.
Click to expand...

Definitely old school, but that doesn't mean he is a misogynist. I know some older woman who have old school views of women and men, doesn't mean they hate women.

My women know I am in control and the boss, so I never have to talk bad about them. I am their lord and hunter who gathers all they need.
 
Northwestman said:
Definitely old school, but that doesn't mean he is a misogynist. I know some older woman who have old school views of women and men, doesn't mean they hate women.

My women know I am in control and the boss, so I never have to talk bad about them. I am their lord and hunter who gathers all they need.
Click to expand...

Women are tools for Trump to use to satisfy his ego, he isn't old school, he is a misogynist. Trump is all about Trump and I don't know how long before the suckers who are voting for him get to realize this.

You are a misogynist also, if you have women you control and are proud of the fact.
 
Rana said:
Women are tools for Trump to use to satisfy his ego, he isn't old school, he is a misogynist. Trump is all about Trump and I don't know how long before the suckers who are voting for him get to realize this.

You are a misogynist also, if you have women you control and are proud of the fact.
Click to expand...

I think he uses men the same way. Everyone is beneath him.

I was kidding about that. But I can pretend :D
 
Rana said:
Women are tools for Bill Clinton to use to satisfy his ego, he isn't old school, he is a misogynist. Bill Clinton is all about Bill Clinton and I don't know how long before the suckers who voted for him get to realize this.

You are a misogynist also, if you have women you control and are proud of the fact.
Click to expand...

FTFY

you are welcome. I know this is what you really meant to say
 
Northwestman said:
I think he uses men the same way. Everyone is beneath him.

I was kidding about that. But I can pretend :D
Click to expand...
But the sad fact is, it's the truth, he normally wouldn't give you the time of day if he weren't running for President, and you don't see him mingling with the lower classes. He is always up on stage behind his podium addressing the people.

I wonder if he will be forced to mingle to get the general vote?
 
Thing1 said:
No problem. Apology accepted.

Who told you that, anyway? The RNC playbook? Rush?
Click to expand...

So you admit that you were just using the pre-programed comments from the DNC playbook!! :good4u:
You're last comment is nothing more then another pathetic attempt, by you, to change the subject matter. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top