Trump is acting even more guilty than Nixon

Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
If you’re thinking about Meeting Gate keep in mind that it will be Manafort’s word against everyone else’s—and Manafort is jammed up with some serious charges against him.

Don’t forget that Jonathan Huber can throw a wrench into Mullets little schemes.

THAT, would be interesting lol.
Click to expand...

I think the meeting where Don Jr agreed to meet with Russians to get dirt on Hillary is actually going to become simply corroborating evidence against President Trump.
 
Hello noise,

noise said:
Mueller is a witch hunt Manforts trial is bout stuff that happened a decade ago
Click to expand...

Trump is the accused. His word is tainted. Trump's word is the 'alternate facts,' if you choose to believe without verification. Thus, the 'witch hunt' becomes a justified investigation to learn the real truth.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



I think the meeting where Don Jr agreed to meet with Russians to get dirt on Hillary is actually going to become simply corroborating evidence against President Trump.
Click to expand...

What if the defense invokes Hillary’s use of Russian dirt in front of the jury?
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello noise,



Trump is the accused. His word is tainted. Trump's word is the 'alternate facts,' if you choose to believe without verification. Thus, the 'witch hunt' becomes a justified investigation to learn the real truth.
Click to expand...
Trump is not "accused" -even Comey back during the FBI investigation said "Trump is not a target"
 
PoliTalker said:
If President Trump wants the greater majority of Americans to believe in him and believe in his innocence, he needs to stop calling the highly justified and appropriate Special Counsel Investigation a witch hunt, and instead embrace it's veracity. He needs to allow the investigation to complete it's course, and thus prove his innocence.

Robert Mueller is a highly respected professional who is dedicated to finding the truth. He was heralded by BOTH SIDES (Republicans included) when he was appointed to his task.

Trump needs to back off, and if he doesn't, it only makes him appear to be acting guilty.
Click to expand...

That's why everybody is saying he's acting guilty as hell. If he was innocent, he wouldn't call it a Witch Hunt.

He's such an idiot.
 
Hello noise,

noise said:
Trump is not "accused" -even Comey back during the FBI investigation said "Trump is not a target"
Click to expand...

That is what is known as old news. More light has been shed since then.

Trump is not yet legally accused of anything.

Evidence is still being collected.

Trump is only 'accused' in the public court.

And in the public court, his word is tainted.

Most of America thinks he's lying.

That is why we are having a justified investigation, and why that investigation must be completed to the satisfaction of the American people.
 
Irish said:
I wouldn't expect someone with the lowest IQ on here to comprehend an argument. If a foreign entity comes to a campaign with information, its not illegal to hear them out.

Either way Russia didn't have squat to do with 2016. Hillary ran a bad campaign, and you libtards can't except it.
Click to expand...

You’ve been provided the appropriate statutes innumerable times, idiot. Find a literate 10 year old to explain them to you.
 
Last edited:
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
Calling such an obvious double standard to the jury’s attention would suck though, wouldn’t it.
Click to expand...

This trial is not about collusion or Trump.

It's a process.

If Mueller gets a conviction, then Manafort will be motivated to make a deal to turn on Trump and sing like a canary, joining Gates, in return for a reduced sentence. That could be very bad for Trump.

If I were Trump, and I were guilty, I would be extremely concerned about this trial outcome.

And I would be tweeting up a storm to try to spin it all I could, for whatever that is worth, although it is doubtful any of these officials will be swayed away from their tasks by any amount of Trump's tweets.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



This trial is not about collusion or Trump.

It's a process.

If Mueller gets a conviction, then Manafort will be motivated to make a deal to turn on Trump and sing like a canary, joining Gates, in return for a reduced sentence. That could be very bad for Trump.

If I were Trump, and I were guilty, I would be extremely concerned about this trial outcome.

And I would be tweeting up a storm to try to spin it all I could, for whatever that is worth, although it is doubtful any of these officials will be swayed away from their tasks by any amount of Trump's tweets.
Click to expand...

thought of this all by yourself did you?

Dear God where do they come from
 
Darth Omar said:
What do you think the meeting was about? And what evidence do you have to back your conspiracy theory?
Click to expand...

Dude.

The whole point is that Trump and his Conservative friends have changed their statements about this meeting several times.

First, they said "no one had any contact with Russia"

Then they said "there was contact, but it was about adoption"

Then they said "there was contact, it was about getting dirt on Clinton"

Then they said "there was contact, it was about getting dirt on Clinton, but it didn't amount to anything"

So that's four different explanations behind just that one meeting...that's not involving the other 80 contacts they have since admitted to.

I think that Trump found out through his people that Russia had hacked e-mails on Clinton, and the meeting at Trump Tower in June was to discuss those hacked materials and what the strategy would be for leaking them during the campaign.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



This trial is not about collusion or Trump.

It's a process.

If Mueller gets a conviction, then Manafort will be motivated to make a deal to turn on Trump and sing like a canary, joining Gates, in return for a reduced sentence. That could be very bad for Trump.

If I were Trump, and I were guilty, I would be extremely concerned about this trial outcome.

And I would be tweeting up a storm to try to spin it all I could, for whatever that is worth, although it is doubtful any of these officials will be swayed away from their tasks by any amount of Trump's tweets.
Click to expand...

If I were Trump and I knew I was guilty I would have done something besides Tweet by now lol.

I’d fire Rosenstein for starters. It would be politically risky but if I’m guilty, I’m screwed anyway, so I take the risk. Kind of a no-brainer.

But Trump hasn’t done anything besides Tweet.

And if Trump was really hot after Russian help, the Meeting would have went longer than 20 minutes. Junior would have pressed the Russian lawyer and maybe even attempted to bribe her.

Is the any evidence that went on?
 
Phantasmal said:
I am not privy to the information Mueller has, how about you, but just from the Manafort trial, I’d be very concerned if I were Trump.
Click to expand...

Trump has nothing to do with the Manafort trial as determined by the Judge. Liberals love to make up their own fantasy world to feed their massive case of TDS.
 
Truth Detector said:
Where's the crime if that is the whole point? Moron.
Click to expand...

Well firstly, Uday and Hope Hicks are in trouble for lying to Congress about the meeting. So that's a crime.

Secondly, to solicit or receive anything of material support from a foreign power is also against the law. Whether or not they actually got anything doesn't change the illegality of it.

Thirdly, why have the explanations changed so much about the meeting? The constant shifting of goalposts seems to indicate they're trying to cover something up.

First, they said "no one had any contact with Russia"

Then they said "there was contact with Russia, but it was about adoption"

Then they said "there was contact with Russia, it wasn't about adoption, it was about getting dirt on Clinton"

Then they said "there was contact with Russia, it was to get dirt on Clinton, but nothing came of it"

Now they're saying "there was contact with Russia, it was to get dirt on Clinton, nothing came of it, so it's not against the law"

Well, it's not for them to decide if it's against the law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top