Trump is acting even more guilty than Nixon

Joe Capitalist

Racism is a disease
Only one other president has ever acted this desperate
President Trump is acting with a desperation I’ve seen only once before in Washington: 45 years ago when President Richard M. Nixon ordered the firing of special Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox. Nixon was fixated on ending the Watergate investigation, just as Trump*wants to shut down the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
A lesson for the president from history: It turned out badly for Nixon. Not only could he not derail the investigation, but also, 10 months later, he was forced to resign the presidency.
In fact, in some ways, Trump is conducting himself more frantically than Nixon, all the while protesting his innocence. Nixon fought to the end because he knew that what was on the tape recordings that the prosecutor wanted would incriminate him. We don’t know what Trump is hiding, if anything. But if he is innocent of any wrongdoing, why not let Robert S. Mueller III do his job and prove it?
In October 1973, Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Cox. Richardson refused and resigned. As deputy attorney general and next in line, I was ordered by the president to fire Cox; I also refused and resigned. Cox was finally fired by Solicitor General Robert H. Bork. The result is what came to be known as the Saturday Night Massacre.
Neither Richardson nor I saw any justifiable reason for Cox’s dismissal. When it became clear that Cox would not give up his pursuit of the Oval Office tapes, Nixon took the only action he could to protect himself: He tried to get rid of the man charged with investigating him.
Nixon was desperate. His goal was to shut down the Watergate investigation by ridding himself of Cox. Instead, Nixon got Leon Jaworski, the highly respected former president of the American Bar Association. Nine months later, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision forcing Nixon to release the tapes that proved his guilt. Shortly thereafter, the president resigned.
Not only was that Saturday night the beginning of the end of the Nixon presidency, but it also accelerated the growing wave of political cynicism and distrust in our government we are still living with today. One manifestation of that legacy: a president who will never admit he uttered a falsehood and a Congress too often pursuing only a partisan version of the truth.
Trump might attempt to shut down the Mueller investigation, but if he fires the special counsel, he could face the same result Nixon faced. He would look like a president with something to hide. He would unleash forces bigger than one man, because Americans believe no one is above the law, not even the president.
Nixon was brought down by his disrespect for the rule of law. The hundreds of letters I received after my refusal to fire Cox enshrined this thought in my head for the rest of my life.
It’s hard to believe that, 45 years later, we may be in store for another damaging attack on the foundations of our democracy. Yet the cynical conduct of this president, his lawyers and a handful of congressional Republicans is frightening to me and should be to every citizen of this country. We are not playing just another Washington political game; there is much more at stake.
The vehemence and irresponsibility of the rhetoric attacking the Mueller investigation tear at the very structure of our governance. Men who have sworn to use and protect our institutions of justice are steadily weakening them. Should the president finally decide to fire Mueller and put in place someone who will do his bidding, the country could be thrown into a political crisis that would scar our democracy and further erode the trust of our people in our governmental institutions.
We need leaders who tell the truth. This is not now happening. Mueller is living up to his superior reputation as a model public servant. His is a search for the truth; we should not complicate his job. Support him, and when he has finished his work, listen to what he has found.
What Mueller unearths will guide our next steps and will strengthen our trust in our institutions — including the one we are now using to find the truth. I hope the president at last studies the lessons of a history I lived — and that he heeds its warning.
 
Nothing dumber than trying to make this farce look like Watergate. Watergate was a huge hubaloo over nothing as well. But alas, when it comes to the Fascism of liberalism, no affair is too small to turn into an impeachment effort.

Lame, pathetic, anti-American and childish. That pretty much describes the Democratic Party of the Jackass these days.
 
Only one other president has ever acted this desperate
President Trump is acting with a desperation I’ve seen only once before in Washington: 45 years ago when President Richard M. Nixon ordered the firing of special Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox. Nixon was fixated on ending the Watergate investigation, just as Trump*wants to shut down the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
A lesson for the president from history: It turned out badly for Nixon. Not only could he not derail the investigation, but also, 10 months later, he was forced to resign the presidency.
In fact, in some ways, Trump is conducting himself more frantically than Nixon, all the while protesting his innocence. Nixon fought to the end because he knew that what was on the tape recordings that the prosecutor wanted would incriminate him. We don’t know what Trump is hiding, if anything. But if he is innocent of any wrongdoing, why not let Robert S. Mueller III do his job and prove it?
In October 1973, Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Cox. Richardson refused and resigned. As deputy attorney general and next in line, I was ordered by the president to fire Cox; I also refused and resigned. Cox was finally fired by Solicitor General Robert H. Bork. The result is what came to be known as the Saturday Night Massacre.
Neither Richardson nor I saw any justifiable reason for Cox’s dismissal. When it became clear that Cox would not give up his pursuit of the Oval Office tapes, Nixon took the only action he could to protect himself: He tried to get rid of the man charged with investigating him.
Nixon was desperate. His goal was to shut down the Watergate investigation by ridding himself of Cox. Instead, Nixon got Leon Jaworski, the highly respected former president of the American Bar Association. Nine months later, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision forcing Nixon to release the tapes that proved his guilt. Shortly thereafter, the president resigned.
Not only was that Saturday night the beginning of the end of the Nixon presidency, but it also accelerated the growing wave of political cynicism and distrust in our government we are still living with today. One manifestation of that legacy: a president who will never admit he uttered a falsehood and a Congress too often pursuing only a partisan version of the truth.
Trump might attempt to shut down the Mueller investigation, but if he fires the special counsel, he could face the same result Nixon faced. He would look like a president with something to hide. He would unleash forces bigger than one man, because Americans believe no one is above the law, not even the president.
Nixon was brought down by his disrespect for the rule of law. The hundreds of letters I received after my refusal to fire Cox enshrined this thought in my head for the rest of my life.
It’s hard to believe that, 45 years later, we may be in store for another damaging attack on the foundations of our democracy. Yet the cynical conduct of this president, his lawyers and a handful of congressional Republicans is frightening to me and should be to every citizen of this country. We are not playing just another Washington political game; there is much more at stake.
The vehemence and irresponsibility of the rhetoric attacking the Mueller investigation tear at the very structure of our governance. Men who have sworn to use and protect our institutions of justice are steadily weakening them. Should the president finally decide to fire Mueller and put in place someone who will do his bidding, the country could be thrown into a political crisis that would scar our democracy and further erode the trust of our people in our governmental institutions.
We need leaders who tell the truth. This is not now happening. Mueller is living up to his superior reputation as a model public servant. His is a search for the truth; we should not complicate his job. Support him, and when he has finished his work, listen to what he has found.
What Mueller unearths will guide our next steps and will strengthen our trust in our institutions — including the one we are now using to find the truth. I hope the president at last studies the lessons of a history I lived — and that he heeds its warning.

LINK?
 
The difference is, of course, that this time President IAmNotACrook has a loyal cadre of belligerent idiots backing him up.... and an entire legislative branch as well.
 
I don't think the other Republicans have the gravitos to bring Trump in line. I predict Muller will present damning evidence, the Republicans will pretend it is nothing, change the definition of words, and we will get 4 more years of Trump.
 
Get back with us when Trump does something to Mullet besides rightfully Tweeting that his investigation a Witch Hunt.
 
And here’s something for those who are blissfully unenlightened about the ‘Boy Scout’ Mullet:

Fast forward to 2009. According to an extensive report by former FBI Director William Webster, Mueller’s FBI was handed at least 18 emails exposing the evil machinations of a radical Islamic army major by the name of Nidal Hasan. In the emails – many of which were to terrorist cleric Anwar al-Awlaki – Hasan made clear his hatred of his fellow soldiers, writing, "I would assume that a suicide bomber whose aim is to kill enemy soldiers or their helpers but also kill innocents in the process is acceptable."

Rather than alert the Department of Defense to Hasan’s rantings as was his duty, Mueller – ever the apologist for radical Islam -- covered them up. His FBI buried the emails because, according to the Webster report, the FBI saw no evidence of terrorist activities. This, despite the fact that al-Awlaki was on the FBI’s own terrorist watch list! And in any case, Mueller’s FBI decided the information in the e-mails was too sensitive to share because visiting extremist websites – where they routinely expose their rabid ideology -- was not grounds for taking action.

Nidal Hasan went on to murder 13 “enemy soldiers” at Fort Hood, Texas. Mueller’s terse response to his FBI’s failing to take appropriate actions that could well have spared the soldiers’ lives? “They [his minions] took appropriate steps.” Meaning, none.

One would have thought that after his own malfeasance contributed to13 innocent deaths, you might think that even the obtuse Robert Swann would have learned his lesson about soft-peddling Islamic extremist. Well, think again.

In February 2012, Mr. Mueller held a secret meeting in February 2012 with radical Islamic groups to work with them on gutting FBI terrorist training materials. At the meeting – which included two groups named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case – the effete Mueller assured his NBFs (New Best Friends) that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices around the country that the Islamic radicals deemed “offensive.”

After exposing Mueller’s patty cake party with the Islamist extremists, Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton commented, “There is no question that the country is less safe when we allow radical Muslim organizations to tell the FBI how to train its agents and do its job.” And how right he was!

Mueller’s training materials purge was in 2012. One year later, two brothers who had slipped under the now eviscerated FBI radar bombed the Boston Marathon. Three years later, other terrorists who had slipped under the FBI radar massacred Christmas partiers in San Bernardino, California. And four years later, yet another terrorist who had slipped under the FBI radar slaughtered scores of partiers at an Orlando, Florida nightclub. Little wonder that, according to this writer’s highly credible inside sources, Robert Mueller is disdained and despised by good, decent, and loyal FBI agents.

https://eagleactionreport.com/articles/unvarnished-robert-mueller-contempt-rule-law
 
Only one other president has ever acted this desperate
President Trump is acting with a desperation I’ve seen only once before in Washington: 45 years ago when President Richard M. Nixon ordered the firing of special Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox. Nixon was fixated on ending the Watergate investigation, just as Trump*wants to shut down the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
A lesson for the president from history: It turned out badly for Nixon. Not only could he not derail the investigation, but also, 10 months later, he was forced to resign the presidency.
In fact, in some ways, Trump is conducting himself more frantically than Nixon, all the while protesting his innocence. Nixon fought to the end because he knew that what was on the tape recordings that the prosecutor wanted would incriminate him. We don’t know what Trump is hiding, if anything. But if he is innocent of any wrongdoing, why not let Robert S. Mueller III do his job and prove it?
In October 1973, Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Cox. Richardson refused and resigned. As deputy attorney general and next in line, I was ordered by the president to fire Cox; I also refused and resigned. Cox was finally fired by Solicitor General Robert H. Bork. The result is what came to be known as the Saturday Night Massacre.
Neither Richardson nor I saw any justifiable reason for Cox’s dismissal. When it became clear that Cox would not give up his pursuit of the Oval Office tapes, Nixon took the only action he could to protect himself: He tried to get rid of the man charged with investigating him.
Nixon was desperate. His goal was to shut down the Watergate investigation by ridding himself of Cox. Instead, Nixon got Leon Jaworski, the highly respected former president of the American Bar Association. Nine months later, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision forcing Nixon to release the tapes that proved his guilt. Shortly thereafter, the president resigned.
Not only was that Saturday night the beginning of the end of the Nixon presidency, but it also accelerated the growing wave of political cynicism and distrust in our government we are still living with today. One manifestation of that legacy: a president who will never admit he uttered a falsehood and a Congress too often pursuing only a partisan version of the truth.
Trump might attempt to shut down the Mueller investigation, but if he fires the special counsel, he could face the same result Nixon faced. He would look like a president with something to hide. He would unleash forces bigger than one man, because Americans believe no one is above the law, not even the president.
Nixon was brought down by his disrespect for the rule of law. The hundreds of letters I received after my refusal to fire Cox enshrined this thought in my head for the rest of my life.
It’s hard to believe that, 45 years later, we may be in store for another damaging attack on the foundations of our democracy. Yet the cynical conduct of this president, his lawyers and a handful of congressional Republicans is frightening to me and should be to every citizen of this country. We are not playing just another Washington political game; there is much more at stake.
The vehemence and irresponsibility of the rhetoric attacking the Mueller investigation tear at the very structure of our governance. Men who have sworn to use and protect our institutions of justice are steadily weakening them. Should the president finally decide to fire Mueller and put in place someone who will do his bidding, the country could be thrown into a political crisis that would scar our democracy and further erode the trust of our people in our governmental institutions.
We need leaders who tell the truth. This is not now happening. Mueller is living up to his superior reputation as a model public servant. His is a search for the truth; we should not complicate his job. Support him, and when he has finished his work, listen to what he has found.
What Mueller unearths will guide our next steps and will strengthen our trust in our institutions — including the one we are now using to find the truth. I hope the president at last studies the lessons of a history I lived — and that he heeds its warning.

Just hang his ass....and call it Tyrannicide. Does it really matter that he was duly elected? Truth: You will have to beat his ass at the ballot box.....and you know that is most improbable...thus the lynch mob looking for short robe and a tall tree. But this is nothing new for the democrat party.....they held quite a few of these lynchings during the Jim Crow age. This is priceless. Still crying after almost 2 years. :(
 
Get back with us when Trump does something to Mullet besides rightfully Tweeting that his investigation a Witch Hunt.

Rightfully? How do you know Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt if you're not privy to the details and evidence?
Is it because Trump said so? Your really like sucking his liddle dick that much?
 
Rightfully? How do you know Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt if you're not privy to the details and evidence?
Is it because Trump said so? Your really like sucking his liddle dick that much?

How do you know its not without being privy to the details, methods and evidences? Talk about a pot calling a kettle black. (:
 
How do you know its not without being privy to the details, methods and evidences? Talk about a pot calling a kettle black. (:

And this from people who wouldn’t recognize a conflict of interest if it rose up and bit them in the ass lol.
 
Back
Top