Trump Is 50% More Likely Than Biden to Win As of 11/8/2020

Concart said:
Chasing ambulances apparently doesn’t make you a real lawyer. If you didn’t know this was hearsay you got your law degre at Cracker Jack U. It is hearsay. You are a poser.
Click to expand...

He DID get his degree at Cracker Jack U. It was such a low class law school that it closed its doors. They couldn’t even find a third tier university in Tennessee to take it over.
 
Concart said:
Hey Perry Mason tell me about hearsay again.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...poll-worker-fraud-claim-as-vague-hearsay/amp/

ROTFLMFAO!
Click to expand...

uh, dude......this confirms what I said.......the Michigan case is different than the PA case......from your link.....

Wrote Stephens: “The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what “other hired poll workers at her table” had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence.”
Click to expand...

testifying about something a third party said THEY heard is hearsay........testifying about hearing what someone said they DID is not.......

in the PA case the whistleblower has filed an affidavit saying he heard a postal worker telling someone he had changed postmarks.......excellent example of the difference, thank you......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
uh, dude......this confirms what I said.......the Michigan case is different than the PA case......from your link.....



testifying about something a third party said THEY heard is hearsay........testifying about hearing what someone said they DID is not.......

in the PA case the whistleblower has filed an affidavit saying he heard a postal worker telling someone he had changed postmarks.......excellent example of the difference, thank you......
Click to expand...

Yes, we are talking about two different cases. I'm talking about the one that was dismissed out of hand by the courts. You are talking about the one where a Trumptard made up a story about overhearing supervisors telling people to backdate ballots. So you were talking about the liar, and I was talking about the hearsay witness.

ROTFLFMAO!!! Have fun with your little lawsuits.
 
rofl.....while at least you admit you were wrong about hearsay......next time, don't act like an idiot and you won't get slapped around as much......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
rofl.....while at least you admit you were wrong about hearsay......next time, don't act like an idiot and you won't get slapped around as much......
Click to expand...

Nope I wasn't wrong. We were talking about two different things. Are you the least bit embarrassed that you can't produce these supposed affidavits and your Trumptard buddy in Pennsylvania was lying? Probably not. You probably admire the guy.
 
Concart said:
Nope I wasn't wrong. We were talking about two different things. Are you the least bit embarrassed that you can't produce these supposed affidavits and your Trumptard buddy in Pennsylvania was lying? Probably not. You probably admire the guy.
Click to expand...

no.....we were talking about hearsay and you still look incredibly wrong.......aren't you at least embarrassed about the totally transparent job you guys did in trying to steal the election?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no.....we were talking about hearsay and you still look incredibly wrong.......aren't you at least embarrassed about the totally transparent job you guys did in trying to steal the election?......
Click to expand...

Still waiting for that proof. You know, something other than a lying Trumptard postal worker. Got anything?
 
Diesel said:
You might be the dumbest fucking person on this website. Goodbye.
Click to expand...

not so long as you're here....now, which law are you referring to........an election official's arbitrary statement, a judge's decision?.......or something that won't be thrown out by the SC like a statute passed by the state's legislature........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not so long as you're here....now, which law are you referring to........an election official's arbitrary statement, a judge's decision?.......or something that won't be thrown out by the SC like a statute passed by the state's legislature........
Click to expand...

The law, you stupid fuck -- both of them were passed by the legislature and signed by the governor.
 
volsrock said:
Trump Is 50% More Likely Than Biden to Win As of 11/8/2020]
Click to expand...

If you can really find someone willing to use those odds to make a bet, then you have the ultimate arbitrage situation. Most betting markets will give you fantastic odds for Biden winning, and you say you have another that will give you good odds for trump winning.

Lets say you bet $1000 on Biden winning in your market, and then $1000 on trump winning in a market that pays 10 to 1. If trump wins, you lose $1000 on your market, but win $10,000 on the reasonable market. If Biden wins, you win $1,500 on your market, and lose $1000 on the reasonable market. In total, you win either $500 or $9000 for every $1000 you bet. That is a ROI of either 50% or 900% over two months.
 
ExpressLane said:
They have 240 pages of SWORN affidavits in Michigan alone. That is called evidence son. :laugh:
Click to expand...

No sane person talks about the number of pages. It would be the number of sworn affidavits, and what they say in the shortest version possible. "240 pages" sounds like a con job, and is being treated by the courts as such.
 
Chaz said:
I think enough fraudulent ballots can definitely be tossed out to flip Wisconsin. After that, we'll see how things go with PA, GA, AZ, MI, and NV.
Click to expand...

There was no fraud in WI and your shithead lost the election. It will cost him about 4 million to conduct a recount and he's collecting funds now, you should contribute. He intends to call off the recount and use the funds to pay campaign debt.

The state pays for the recount if the vote difference between the two candidates is 0.25 percentage points or less. If the margin is over that, the cost — estimated by the state elections commission — is to be paid upfront by the candidate who filed the petition.

Trump lost by 0.6% so he must pay for the recount.

Trump activated "the EMERGENCY Wisconsin Recount Fund." But a disclaimer on the campaign's website states that 50% of any donation will go toward the campaign's general election debt retirement and the other half toward the campaign's recount account. A separate fundraising effort by the "Trump Make America Great Again Committee" states that 60% of contributions will go toward campaign debt.

You should contribute, he's counting on dumbasses like you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top