Trump has revived the keystone pipeline

Educate yourself. The EPA preformed an extended...drag your ass so it never gets off the ground...environmental study and concluded the opposite. The pipeline study from Soetoro's EPA said, 'Pipeline not likely to alter greenhouse gas emissions.'

6 years for a study that should been concluded within 90 days. But don't left facts stand in your way. There's a new Sheriff in town...who will own the EPA and its regulations, with a new DOJ who will not allow lawyers to hold anything up...with a congress and senate ready to put America Back to Work.

How long has the Alaskan pipeline been in use? 35 years? Where are all the environmental accidents with any prolonged effect on the environment? The EPA has been turned into a leftist political tool.

Who said anything about greenhouse gas emissions? Oil spill effects can take decades to clear up and who knows what the effects on wildlife are?

The only gas emissions around here are coming out of you. Likewise, the only tool around here is you as well.
 
A lower RATE maybe, but when pipelines leak or spill, the amounts are huge.

Even though pipelines don’t spill as often as other forms of transport, when they do spill, they can unleash a huge amount if not caught in time. In 2010, a pipeline ruptured and spilled 843,000 gallons into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River, the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history. Another pipeline burst in California, spilling as much as 143,000 gallons into the ocean and onto beaches.



You are obviously the one who's confused.

Neither one of those small spills had any real detrimental effect on the environment. If you want to make a case about spills at least bring it to the level of the Valdez or similar. Geez..
 
I wonder if that canadian company is even interested in Keystone anymore. We handled the entire thing like Keystone Cops.
On again.. off again..review after review that was delayed/passed,and was then vetoed by Obama anyways
 
A lower RATE maybe, but when pipelines leak or spill, the amounts are huge.

Even though pipelines don’t spill as often as other forms of transport, when they do spill, they can unleash a huge amount if not caught in time. In 2010, a pipeline ruptured and spilled 843,000 gallons into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River, the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history. Another pipeline burst in California, spilling as much as 143,000 gallons into the ocean and onto beaches.



You are obviously the one who's confused.
How old was that pipeline do you even know?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Who said anything about greenhouse gas emissions? Oil spill effects can take decades to clear up and who knows what the effects on wildlife are?

The only gas emissions around here are coming out of you. Likewise, the only tool around here is you as well.

Do you know just how many 'pipelines' exist in the US...and have existed for decades without any adverse effects? The very reason the US started using pipelines to transfer oil was because its proven to be much saver than using truck or ships. If you don't want to use pipelines to transfer toxic waste then start carrying your shit in little bags to an EPA certified dump point. As human waste is far more toxic to the environment than a natural product of the earth....oil or gas. Just dig up all your sewer pipelines and go from there. :good4u: The fact is, as of 2014 there exists already around the world...some 2 million one hundred seventy five thousand miles of oil transfer pipes....of that total 65% belongs to the US.

The facts prove that pipeline transfer is much safer and dependable than any other source of transfer...rail, truck, rolling barrels down a step hill...etc., What do you want the EPA to dig up the existing transfer lines and demand that the US start rolling barrels to move them from coast to coast? Snowflakes...you listen to the propaganda and never do any independent research before inserting foot in mouth.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top