No.
"Thirteen years ago, the intelligence community concluded in a 93-page classified document used to justify the invasion of Iraq that it lacked "specific information" on "many key aspects" of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs.
But that's not what top Bush administration officials said during their campaign to sell the war to the American public. Those officials, citing the same classified document, asserted with no uncertainty that Iraq was actively pursuing nuclear weapons, concealing a vast chemical and biological weapons arsenal, and posing an immediate and grave threat to US national security."
https://news.vice.com/article/the-c...t-that-supposedly-justified-the-iraq-invasion
Key Judgments (from October 2002 NIE)
Confidence Levels for Selected Key Judgments in This Estimate
High Confidence:
Iraq is continuing, and in some areas expanding, its chemical, biological, nuclear and missile programs contrary to UN resolutions.
We are not detecting portions of these weapons programs.
Iraq possesses proscribed chemical and biological weapons and missiles.
Iraq could make a nuclear weapon in months to a year once it acquires sufficient weapons-grade fissile material.
Moderate Confidence:
Iraq does not yet have a nuclear weapon or sufficient material to make one but is likely to have a weapon by 2007 to 2009.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/reports/2002/nie_iraq_october2002.htm
==============
94 Nations believed Iraq had WMD & 84 Iraqi scientist...were they all wrong?
Nations that said Iraq had WMD's
Israel, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Spain, Canada, U.S.A. France, England, Russia, Iran, Ireland, Kuwait and on and on went on record and said Iraq had WMD.
In the U.S. House of Rep: 178 Democratic members said they believed that Iraq had WMD
In the U.S. Senate 31 Democratic members including Clinton-D N.Y. believed Iraq had WMD