Trump gets republican party sued
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.businessinsider.com/demo...ommittee-donald-trump-rigged-election-2016-10
The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a US judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Trump, the Republican nominee, has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the November 8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was meritless.
The Democratic National Committee on Wednesday asked a US judge to hold the Republican National Committee in contempt of court over allegations that Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to intimidate minority voters.
The DNC accused Republicans in a court filing of violating a longstanding consent decree, which restricts Republicans' ability to question voters at the polls and prevent those people from casting a ballot.
During the presidential campaign, Trump, the Republican nominee, has asked followers to "watch" for fraud in the November 8 presidential election in certain areas where minority voters reside, even though no evidence of fraud exists, the filing said. Some of Trump's followers have pledged to do just that, the filing said.
The RNC has supported Trump's "ballot security endeavors," Democrats said in the court filing.
The RNC said the filing was meritless.
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
April 1, 2009
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. Most recently, in late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the Republican National Committee had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the Republican National Committee asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision.* The RNC subsequently petitioned for rehearing en banc.
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
April 1, 2009
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. Most recently, in late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the Republican National Committee had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the Republican National Committee asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision.* The RNC subsequently petitioned for rehearing en banc.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
why do Democrats want to prevent efforts to stop fraud, Daesh.......what are they spending so much money to hide?.....
Althea
Althea told me...
Correct. The penalty sunsets next year
evince
Truthmatters
why do you hate our entire justice system
evince
Truthmatters
not after this filing
evince
Truthmatters
LMBO......lawsuits over touchy-feely safe place type garbage????? What a whimpy people we've become.
waaah waaah waaah...mommy, that man intimidated me, sniff sniff...give me a break.
Evidence is appearing every day of some kind of voting problems in different states related to registrations, machines, etc. There have always been poll watchers, reps & dems......there always needs to be.
How about 2008 & 2012???????????
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/new-black-panther-party_n_2082423.html
waaah waaah waaah...mommy, that man intimidated me, sniff sniff...give me a break.
Evidence is appearing every day of some kind of voting problems in different states related to registrations, machines, etc. There have always been poll watchers, reps & dems......there always needs to be.
How about 2008 & 2012???????????
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/06/new-black-panther-party_n_2082423.html
evince
Truthmatters
fucking traitor