YOU STUPID JACKASS. I realize trump is just continuing a program started by obama but that is irrelevant. Trump is DOING IT.
it isnt nice to call people names you stupid moron
YOU STUPID JACKASS. I realize trump is just continuing a program started by obama but that is irrelevant. Trump is DOING IT.
i actually think tdak serves a useful purpose. Normally when you do things to benefit your voters almost exclusively you have to pay a political price for it. Like for example increasing the budget of the military or giving subsidies to specific farmers. Democrats and their control of the media have conditioned us to believe that giving stuff to minorities is just par for the course. At least tdak brings awareness of this instead of just ignoring it.
These rent voucher programs are everywhere and they're just more special treatment for blacks. Along with affirmative action and the many forms of welfare blacks get. And then the press howls about white privilege!!
Plenty of single people qualify for welfare programs.
These rent voucher programs are everywhere and they're just more special treatment for blacks. Along with affirmative action and the many forms of welfare blacks get. And then the press howls about white privilege!!
One way to prevent the pathologies of poverty from taking over neighborhoods is to prevent excessive concentrations of poverty. When you have mostly poor people living in a particular place, you tend to see crime, academic under-achievement, obesity, substance abuse, and multi-generational cycles of poverty.
If, instead, poor people are interspersed with middle-class and even wealthy people, there's more ability for high-functioning part of the societies to disrupt vicious cycles. For example, even if you're poor, if you have the ability to go to a public school with lots of kids from middle and upper class families, then you're likely to have plenty of available role models showing people getting ahead through lawful behavior and academic achievement.
If you're a poor person living in a neighborhood with middle and upper class people, then you're more likely to encounter police who have the mentality that they're there to serve and protect you, rather than to contain and subjugate you. So, there's a lot of reason to pursue policies, such as vouchers, rent control, etc., if they're done in a way that they fight slum formation, by making it affordable for poorer people to live interspersed with the society in general, rather than being ghettoized into a handful of affordable neighborhoods.
Lots and lots of white seniors live in subsidized housing.
Yeah, fuck them too, all part of the vision.
One way to prevent the pathologies of poverty from taking over neighborhoods is to prevent excessive concentrations of poverty. When you have mostly poor people living in a particular place, you tend to see crime, academic under-achievement, obesity, substance abuse, and multi-generational cycles of poverty. If, instead, poor people are interspersed with middle-class and even wealthy people, there's more ability for high-functioning part of the societies to disrupt vicious cycles. For example, even if you're poor, if you have the ability to go to a public school with lots of kids from middle and upper class families, then you're likely to have plenty of available role models showing people getting ahead through lawful behavior and academic achievement. If you're a poor person living in a neighborhood with middle and upper class people, then you're more likely to encounter police who have the mentality that they're there to serve and protect you, rather than to contain and subjugate you. So, there's a lot of reason to pursue policies, such as vouchers, rent control, etc., if they're done in a way that they fight slum formation, by making it affordable for poorer people to live interspersed with the society in general, rather than being ghettoized into a handful of affordable neighborhoods.
????? You don't mean that, do you?