Trump enthusiasts?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Why blame Trump ?....The massive $1.3 trillion "omnibus" spending bill has at least one enthusiastic fan: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Schumer proudly proclaimed Thursday that the deal shows that America's "era of austerity" has "come to an end."
The 2,232 page bill, which was released to members today, is expected to be voted on later this afternoon. Schumer said Democrats will enthusiastically support it. "I'm really excited about it," he said.
Democrats want it more than the Republicans.....
Mason Michaels
Verified User
It's not a fucking football game.
It's governing what is the best policy for We the People!
Not only is collusion tough to prove,....it ain't even against the law....
yes it is. always has been. politics is a zero sum game.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
I couldn't disagree more.
You don't "see" anything; you're programmed to emotionally erupt. But telling the Congress he will act without them if he doesn't get his way and lying to the American people about Obamacare; great starting points.
He had me at Hello...
That begs the question...what to you is an impeachable offense?
You mean the fact of collusion that has already been proven don't you.
So what do you consider and High Crime...also what would you consider a misdemeanor worthy of impeachment?
And yet, all you idiots on the left pretend that there is a case and that the Russians helped get him elected. STFU already you incredible lying leftist hypocrite.
They already have that.
What about misdemeanors?
Too stupid to look it up?
You're a brain dead idiot if you think any collusion with Russia between the Trump campaign has been proven. Dunce.
What do you think it means; here's a link dumbass:
http://law.onecle.com/constitution/article-2/52-impeachable-offenses.html
if you think Trump meets any of these, you're dumber than a box of rocks and a dishonest dumbfuck.
They don't no matter how many times you moronically claim they do. Moron.
Political Crimes:
Other scholars claim that "high crimes and misdemeanors" has a well-defined meaning--it refers to so-called "political crimes" (an old legal term). A crime is "political" when it involves the misuse of a politician's official powers. If, for instance, the president accepts a bribe, it's a political crime; if he shoots his wife, it is not. Support for this theory comes from contemporary speeches and the Federalist Papers. For instance, Federalist No. 65 (Alexander Hamilton) says that impeachable offenses "proceed from the misconduct of public men ... from the abuse or violation of some public trust." Under this theory, the obstruction of justice charge would count as impeachable, while the perjury charge would probably not.