TRUMP comments on Girl who Appears in a Controversial Advertisement for Jeans

I saw Trump made a brief comment about a girl named Sydney Sweeney how had done an advertisement for the "American Eagle" brand of jeans. Sydney Sweeney is said to be a Repulican, so when Trump was asked about her in connection to this ad she did for "American Eagle" which become extremely controversial across America, Trump said, pretty much, "All I am interested in is if she votes Republican, and she does, so that's great !"


Sydnery Sweeney's ad for American Eagle jeans show a young female who is said to exemplify the aesthetic standards of the Blonde (long-haired), pale-skinned, blue/ (light green grey) eyes, firm perky breasts, tastefully sinuous, curvaceous figure and facial features (eye shape, nasal structure, jawline extension and so on that define a beautiful young Western woman. The most beautiful of these women are "Nordic" which means they are natives of Scandinavia. Sweden, for example, is well known for it large population of beautiful, blue-eyed blonde women.


I have no problem with stating that I believe beauty is an objective quality in things - that includes young women. That means the traditional aesthetic criteria the West have used to define what is and is not beauty in women is pretty much correct. WESTERN female beauty TRUMPS BLACK AFRICAN/ABORIGINAL/HAITIAN/INDIAN BEAUTY (and ditto of all the other darkly pigmented races) and it TRUMPS ASIAN and MONGOLIAN FEMALE BEAUTY as well


So, in this ad that Sydney Sweeney did for "American Eagle" jeans. Sydney Sweeney is, I think, intended, to exemplify the aesthetic standards that are set for female beauty in the West. We are supposed believe that she is a "HOTTIE". Add the end of the ad she says ostensibly referring to the "American Eagle" jeans.... "GREAT JEANS." Two seconds later anyone with half a brain, figures out the play on words, which is "GREAT GENES" This is immediately linked to White supremacist that the superiority of the White Western race is something that is "in the blood", i.e that is primarily genetically, determined. While it is true that the environment we are raised in from infancy has a certain variable effect on the way people develop, there is no doubt, now, that a person's inherited genetic make-up are likely very influential in shaping a person's physical and mental abilities,, physiology and anatomy.



In America it is still TABOO to openly discuss any aspect of the connection between race and genetic. So when this Sydney Sweeney ad was released the left went right off it's tiny pea brain, because this ad made a point of "saying" the reason this girl is a White American "HOTTIE" is due to her superior White genes.


What really confused mean when I watch this add is that Sydney Sweeney has eyes that are clearly Eurasian or even East Asian shaped into a slit-type form. Westerners do not have eyes that appear slanted or "slit" eye shape. Also her hair is obviously dyed because the upper layers are dark brown but change to blonde about halfway down. If you are wanting to present a woman who is truly beautiful, artificial hair-colouring is a big NO !, NO! Also, although this girl is a White America, in the ad her skin tone is rendered somewhat ambiguous - it certainly doesn't catch your eye as the pallid White that it actually is in real life.


Here is the ad - check it out for yourself....


Http:/youtu.be/AK8s3iqL99c?=xeK98StttLnHSWI


Unfortunately that link doesn't work, but it's easy to find on You Tube


What is is is trhat I don't get why they were using this girl, Sydney Sweeney to represent a White Western Hottie in order to set up their kicker line...GREAT JEAN/GREAT GENES and trigger a major controversy over the Taboo topic of the role genes play and White superiority (in this case the superiority of White Western female beauty). If the wanted to use a top- grade White, Western, American HOTTIE to do that ad, they would have had 1000s to choose from. So why they chose Sydney Sweeney, who does not even look like a While, American girl, I don't Know.
holy shit, you're dumb.
 
Before I dive into a couple of, let’s say, unconventional perspectives our writer has graced us with, let me point out that this piece is a goldmine of libtard logic. I often gripe about how too many folks here just sling clickbait articles instead of offering their own thoughts. Some users post an article as their opener, then keep piling on more articles in replies. Hilarious. I’m not saying articles should never be shared, but we’re here to debate my ideas against yours, not to play newsstand. Anyway, our friend Dachshund delivers a rare, appreciated peek into the libtard mind. And as we all know, one libtard brain is a window into them all.

This is also a prime example of why I lump all the politically clueless under “libtard.” They love slapping different labels on the same tired ideology, so “libtard” covers the lot. This guy trashes the left as pea-brained, separating his ideas and intellegence from the embarrassment that is today's democrat party. I'm guessing, he's above all that and doesn't subscribe to labels. Cue the eye-roll. He’ll probably through around terms like progressive, centrist, democratic socialist, socialist, Marxist, communist, or maybe even a Michael Steel sort of republican, whatever. Truth is, the mind he has exposed is the foundation for all of those labels. They all lead to the same grim destination, stacks of bodies and hordes of miserable, hungry people, except, of course, for the ones pulling the strings. I'll keep this brief, promise. lol


I saw Trump made a brief comment about a girl named Sydney Sweeney.................
Congrats, you're breathing and clearly not locked in a closet.
Trump said, pretty much, "All I am interested in is if she votes Republican, and she does, so that's great !"
Oh boy, I saw this coming a mile away, lol. Poor libtard just can't do humor, it's completely foreign to most of them. Normal people know real humor takes raw honesty mixed with a bit of absurdity. Trump pulls it off like a champ. Most people watching his response live laughed hard and got the joke right away. Average libtard? They choke on it, especially the sanctimonious ones with intellectual superiority syndrome like Dachshund.
Sydnery Sweeney's ad for American Eagle jeans show a young female who is said to exemplify the aesthetic standards of the Blonde (long-haired), pale-skinned, blue/ (light green grey) eyes, firm perky breasts, tastefully sinuous, curvaceous figure and facial features (eye shape, nasal structure, jawline extension and so on that define a beautiful young Western woman.
Who said? Typical drone tactic: "they said," "people are saying," or "a widespread belief." Hilarious. Try "other dumbasses like me said" for accuracy. It’s simple: she’s hot to most people and nails the role perfectly. Someone deserves a raise, because plenty of young guys into young girls definitely got a rise. Those girls know the boys are reacting, and despite libtards’ best efforts, young girls still want young boys to perk up when they see them in those jeans. Sex sells, it’s a well-established fact that only requires a rudimentary understanding of human nature to get it.
I have no problem with stating that I believe beauty is an objective quality in things - that includes young women.
I’m sure you don’t, lol. Seriously, what’s this? You expect a pat on the back for stating the obvious like you’re slumming it with us commoners, tossing in a pinch of fake humility? You unfortunately must admit a sad truth about humans that we have not yet evolved beyond? Lmao.
We are supposed believe that she is a "HOTTIE".
We're supposed to because she is objectively 'hot'. She's a homely mutt, said no one ever. But, I guess you were too clever, they didn't fool you, right?
Add the end of the ad she says ostensibly referring to the "American Eagle" jeans.... "GREAT JEANS." Two seconds later anyone with half a brain, figures out the play on words, which is "GREAT GENES" This is immediately linked to White supremacist that the superiority of the White Western race is something that is "in the blood", i.e that is primarily genetically, determined.
Wrong, anyone with a half-brain maybe, but you still need to be touched by the libtard virus to even go there. However, it did allow for you and other like-minded drones to practice their psychobabble, so I guess there's that.
In America it is still TABOO to openly discuss any aspect of the connection between race and genetic.
Says who? Why don't you enlighten us and begin that discussion with equally sanctimonious drivel, please.
So when this Sydney Sweeney ad was released the left went right off it's tiny pea brain, because this ad made a point of "saying" the reason this girl is a White American "HOTTIE" is due to her superior White genes.
The ad said no such thing, lol. Only a libtard can watch the ad and then think, say, or write absolute unhinged lunacy like you wrote. Most saw a hot chick delivering clever lines in a super sexy way, regardless of color, race, ethnicity, or belief system, just sexy and good at her job, that's all.
What really confused mean when I watch this add is that Sydney Sweeney has eyes that are clearly Eurasian or even East Asian shaped into a slit-type form.
This is the one thing you admit to being confused about? lol. You're confused, there's no doubt about that, you're confused about human nature and common sense for sure. Your entire analysis screams elitist, racist, left-wing bigot, just my opinion.
If you are wanting to present a woman who is truly beautiful, artificial hair-colouring is a big NO !, NO! Also,
I'm sure they appreciate that valuable criticism, if only you were in charge of the ad campaign. Maybe, their stock would have gone even higher with your brilliant analysis and advice, lmao. As it is, a combination of a great ad campaign coupled with all the unexpected additional publicity that the increasingly unhinged left added, I think they're thrilled with their choice.
in the ad her skin tone is rendered somewhat ambiguous - it certainly doesn't catch your eye as the pallid White that it actually is in real life.
In the ad her skin color is irrelevant, except for the racist libtards that are obsessed with melanin levels.
Unfortunately that link doesn't work, but it's easy to find on You Tube
Wow, you're a real brain, aren't you? People, this is a clear example of an educated idiot. I'm pretty sure anyone here is fully aware of how to find it and most could have pulled off using an active link, lol.
I don't get why they were using this girl, Sydney Sweeney to represent a White Western Hottie in order to set up their kicker line...GREAT JEAN/GREAT GENES and trigger a major controversy over the Taboo topic of the role genes play and White superiority (in this case the superiority of White Western female beauty).
No, you don't and likely never will. That's ok, in the meantime, we'll all be just fine without you understanding the patently obvious.
If the wanted to use a top- grade White, Western, American HOTTIE to do that ad, they
They wanted to and they did. That's why it worked so well, dumbass.

Please, expose more of that libtard mind with a reply. Tell us how they obviously knew their would be outrage by the left, lol. I know it's hard for you idiots, but people are still surprised to see the dots that unhinged libtards will connect. This ad is a perfect example.
 
Before I dive into a couple of, let’s say, unconventional perspectives our writer has graced us with, let me point out that this piece is a goldmine of libtard logic. I often gripe about how too many folks here just sling clickbait articles instead of offering their own thoughts. Some users post an article as their opener, then keep piling on more articles in replies. Hilarious. I’m not saying articles should never be shared, but we’re here to debate my ideas against yours, not to play newsstand. Anyway, our friend Dachshund delivers a rare, appreciated peek into the libtard mind. And as we all know, one libtard brain is a window into them all.

This is also a prime example of why I lump all the politically clueless under “libtard.” They love slapping different labels on the same tired ideology, so “libtard” covers the lot. This guy trashes the left as pea-brained, separating his ideas and intellegence from the embarrassment that is today's democrat party. I'm guessing, he's above all that and doesn't subscribe to labels. Cue the eye-roll. He’ll probably through around terms like progressive, centrist, democratic socialist, socialist, Marxist, communist, or maybe even a Michael Steel sort of republican, whatever. Truth is, the mind he has exposed is the foundation for all of those labels. They all lead to the same grim destination, stacks of bodies and hordes of miserable, hungry people, except, of course, for the ones pulling the strings. I'll keep this brief, promise. lol



Congrats, you're breathing and clearly not locked in a closet.

Oh boy, I saw this coming a mile away, lol. Poor libtard just can't do humor, it's completely foreign to most of them. Normal people know real humor takes raw honesty mixed with a bit of absurdity. Trump pulls it off like a champ. Most people watching his response live laughed hard and got the joke right away. Average libtard? They choke on it, especially the sanctimonious ones with intellectual superiority syndrome like Dachshund.

Who said? Typical drone tactic: "they said," "people are saying," or "a widespread belief." Hilarious. Try "other dumbasses like me said" for accuracy. It’s simple: she’s hot to most people and nails the role perfectly. Someone deserves a raise, because plenty of young guys into young girls definitely got a rise. Those girls know the boys are reacting, and despite libtards’ best efforts, young girls still want young boys to perk up when they see them in those jeans. Sex sells, it’s a well-established fact that only requires a rudimentary understanding of human nature to get it.

I’m sure you don’t, lol. Seriously, what’s this? You expect a pat on the back for stating the obvious like you’re slumming it with us commoners, tossing in a pinch of fake humility? You unfortunately must admit a sad truth about humans that we have not yet evolved beyond? Lmao.

We're supposed to because she is objectively 'hot'. She's a homely mutt, said no one ever. But, I guess you were too clever, they didn't fool you, right?

Wrong, anyone with a half-brain maybe, but you still need to be touched by the libtard virus to even go there. However, it did allow for you and other like-minded drones to practice their psychobabble, so I guess there's that.

Says who? Why don't you enlighten us and begin that discussion with equally sanctimonious drivel, please.

The ad said no such thing, lol. Only a libtard can watch the ad and then think, say, or write absolute unhinged lunacy like you wrote. Most saw a hot chick delivering clever lines in a super sexy way, regardless of color, race, ethnicity, or belief system, just sexy and good at her job, that's all.

This is the one thing you admit to being confused about? lol. You're confused, there's no doubt about that, you're confused about human nature and common sense for sure. Your entire analysis screams elitist, racist, left-wing bigot, just my opinion.

I'm sure they appreciate that valuable criticism, if only you were in charge of the ad campaign. Maybe, their stock would have gone even higher with your brilliant analysis and advice, lmao. As it is, a combination of a great ad campaign coupled with all the unexpected additional publicity that the increasingly unhinged left added, I think they're thrilled with their choice.

In the ad her skin color is irrelevant, except for the racist libtards that are obsessed with melanin levels.

Wow, you're a real brain, aren't you? People, this is a clear example of an educated idiot. I'm pretty sure anyone here is fully aware of how to find it and most could have pulled off using an active link, lol.

No, you don't and likely never will. That's ok, in the meantime, we'll all be just fine without you understanding the patently obvious.

They wanted to and they did. That's why it worked so well, dumbass.

Please, expose more of that libtard mind with a reply. Tell us how they obviously knew their would be outrage by the left, lol. I know it's hard for you idiots, but people are still surprised to see the dots that unhinged libtards will connect. This ad is a perfect example.

Dear TOBYTONE...


I don't know why you refer to me as a "LIBTARD" My understand of that term is that it refers to a member of the Left, who is not just stupid ( because that's taken for granted) but to a Democrat - voting liberal who is PARTICULARLY dumb. For instance, any American who voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential election would be "LIBTARD" because, let's face it, only a political CRETIN could ever do something like that. Right? As far as my own politics are concerned, I am a social "Conservative", or what you might call a moderate Republican (in America). To put it another way, I think Trump is a brilliant American President, and you guys are very lucky that he won a second term in 2024, because, dude, your country was in very serious trouble after four years of extreme and insane leftist lunacy. I mean, I just have to mention one of the Biden administration's brilliant policies, namely: "open borders", and that says it all. What kind of brain-dead fuck -wit would want to open America's Southern Border to a flood of un-vetted, illegal immigrants from the Third World ? Actually, I can tell you what kind of mentality was behind this disgusting attempt to destroy America - it was the mentality of the neo-Marxist revolutionary. Although Trump kicked their ass in November of 2024- as saved your bacon (for the time being), you need to understand that the enemy is not defeated - far from it ! it's just that this enemy has learned how to conceal itself under the guise of "normality;" It has also managed to deeply infiltrate many fundamental American institutions, such a the educational system: Many of your Universities and colleges, the K-12 public schooling; the big teacher unions like the NEA andAFT and all of the teacher training colleges. The Mainstream Media ( electronic and print) are also heavily infiltrated, as are many political organisations (at all levels of government: local, state and Federal. The Christian Church (all denominations) has been seriously weakened, and the the entertainment industry, for example, (Hollywood, Disney) has been infected by "Woke" ideology.



Abraham Lincoln is reputed to have said that America could never be defeated by an external (i.e foreign) enemy.; it could only ever be conquered, he said, by an enemy within. Lincoln was dead right . Although he would not have been able to envision a future where wars were not fought with physical "bombs and bullets,", but instead with psychological weapons, or, if you like, with politically weaponised IDEAS - it is what happened in America. Most people are familiar with the term "Culture War/s" This is what I'm talking about.


So, even whilst a lot of Americans don't realise it, there is a desperate "Culture War" raging in their country. The combatants in this fight are America vs Communism - same as was the case in the "Cold War". The Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union began not long after the end of the Second World War, say, 1946 or 1947. America ultimately won the Cold War in 1991 (when the Soviet Union collapsed under consistent US pressure). President Reagan deserves most of the kudos for this tremendous victory. During the "Cold War" America and the Soviets did not directly encounter each other in battle, rather, the conventional combat that did occur took place through proxy conflicts, for example: America's war in Vietnam; or the American CIA being dispatched to provide training, weapons and funding to support the "Mujahideen" in Afghanistan - after the Soviets invaded the country in 1980; the struggle between US-backed CONTRAS against the Sandinista communist government in Nicaragua and there were many other US - backed offensives that took place during the "Cold War" (from memory there was one time that US troops were directly engaged with a Marxist government and that was on the island of Granada (I think).







SO WHAT'S ANY OF THIS GOT TO DO WITH SYDNEY SWEENEY'S JEAN'S
AD ?





I\LL POST THE REST OF MY VIEWS ON THIS ISSUE FOR YOU SHORTLY !!


Dachshund the Wonder Hound

DLM....DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
 
Dear TOBYTONE...


I don't know why you refer to me as a "LIBTARD" My understand of that term is that it refers to a member of the Left, who is not just stupid ( because that's taken for granted) but to a Democrat - voting liberal who is PARTICULARLY dumb. For instance, any American who voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 Presidential election would be "LIBTARD" because, let's face it, only a political CRETIN could ever do something like that. Right? As far as my own politics are concerned, I am a social "Conservative", or what you might call a moderate Republican (in America). To put it another way, I think Trump is a brilliant American President, and you guys are very lucky that he won a second term in 2024, because, dude, your country was in very serious trouble after four years of extreme and insane leftist lunacy. I mean, I just have to mention one of the Biden administration's brilliant policies, namely: "open borders", and that says it all. What kind of brain-dead fuck -wit would want to open America's Southern Border to a flood of un-vetted, illegal immigrants from the Third World ? Actually, I can tell you what kind of mentality was behind this disgusting attempt to destroy America - it was the mentality of the neo-Marxist revolutionary. Although Trump kicked their ass in November of 2024- as saved your bacon (for the time being), you need to understand that the enemy is not defeated - far from it ! it's just that this enemy has learned how to conceal itself under the guise of "normality;" It has also managed to deeply infiltrate many fundamental American institutions, such a the educational system: Many of your Universities and colleges, the K-12 public schooling; the big teacher unions like the NEA andAFT and all of the teacher training colleges. The Mainstream Media ( electronic and print) are also heavily infiltrated, as are many political organisations (at all levels of government: local, state and Federal. The Christian Church (all denominations) has been seriously weakened, and the the entertainment industry, for example, (Hollywood, Disney) has been infected by "Woke" ideology.



Abraham Lincoln is reputed to have said that America could never be defeated by an external (i.e foreign) enemy.; it could only ever be conquered, he said, by an enemy within. Lincoln was dead right . Although he would not have been able to envision a future where wars were not fought with physical "bombs and bullets,", but instead with psychological weapons, or, if you like, with politically weaponised IDEAS - it is what happened in America. Most people are familiar with the term "Culture War/s" This is what I'm talking about.


So, even whilst a lot of Americans don't realise it, there is a desperate "Culture War" raging in their country. The combatants in this fight are America vs Communism - same as was the case in the "Cold War". The Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union began not long after the end of the Second World War, say, 1946 or 1947. America ultimately won the Cold War in 1991 (when the Soviet Union collapsed under consistent US pressure). President Reagan deserves most of the kudos for this tremendous victory. During the "Cold War" America and the Soviets did not directly encounter each other in battle, rather, the conventional combat that did occur took place through proxy conflicts, for example: America's war in Vietnam; or the American CIA being dispatched to provide training, weapons and funding to support the "Mujahideen" in Afghanistan - after the Soviets invaded the country in 1980; the struggle between US-backed CONTRAS against the Sandinista communist government in Nicaragua and there were many other US - backed offensives that took place during the "Cold War" (from memory there was one time that US troops were directly engaged with a Marxist government and that was on the island of Granada (I think).







SO WHAT'S ANY OF THIS GOT TO DO WITH SYDNEY SWEENEY'S JEAN'S
AD ?





I\LL POST THE REST OF MY VIEWS ON THIS ISSUE FOR YOU SHORTLY !!


Dachshund the Wonder Hound

DLM....DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
For a second there, I forgot what you had said to warrant my response. You didn't write one thing I disagree with, this analysis was pretty much dead on. I don’t have time right now to dig up the comment I took issue with, but if memory serves, it was your assumptions about the ad creators and/or the top dogs at American Eagle, their intended message, and their motivations that got under my skin. Advertising isn’t like politics with its endless agendas and power grabs in the mix of their messaging. Advertising has one mission: sell, sell, sell with the exception of the dumbasses that thought including politics and the woke message would help drive sales.

This clothing ad worked because the creator went back to basics. Sydney Sweeney was the perfect choice, not for some shady reason, but because she had the look, the voice, and the acting skills to pull off the vision, all tied to that brilliant tagline, “my jeans are blue.” That line was the whole reason they needed someone with blue eyes, pure and simple. It’s a
well-done ad that would’ve crushed it on its own, without the insane controversy stirred up by libtards overanalyzing everything to death. I don’t believe for a second the ad campaign was meant to cause this ridiculous drama. Even with my understanding of the left’s insanity, I wouldn’t have predicted this reaction beyond a few whack jobs on TikTok.

And before anyone starts parroting CNN or MSNBC’s latest spin, let’s be clear, Republicans didn’t blow this thing up. Those outlets know their audiences are gullible morons, so they twist the narrative, because their polling must be showing it's not working out for them, again. Now, some of them acting like they didn’t start the controversy with their “some are saying” bullshit. Who’s “some”? Nobody ever knows, lol.

My issue with your take is that I think you fell into the same trap as the left, overanalyzing something blatantly simple and obvious, slapping on some perceived intent like it's obvious or even fact. Libtards take that tactic to the extreme. That’s why I pinned you as one of them, despite your earlier jab at their nonsense. I do remember scratching my head because I thought I had seen previous comments you wrote I completely agreed with, so I guess I was at least remembering that correctly.
 
For a second there, I forgot what you had said to warrant my response. You didn't write one thing I disagree with, this analysis was pretty much dead on. I don’t have time right now to dig up the comment I took issue with, but if memory serves, it was your assumptions about the ad creators and/or the top dogs at American Eagle, their intended message, and their motivations that got under my skin. Advertising isn’t like politics with its endless agendas and power grabs in the mix of their messaging. Advertising has one mission: sell, sell, sell with the exception of the dumbasses that thought including politics and the woke message would help drive sales.

This clothing ad worked because the creator went back to basics. Sydney Sweeney was the perfect choice, not for some shady reason, but because she had the look, the voice, and the acting skills to pull off the vision, all tied to that brilliant tagline, “my jeans are blue.” That line was the whole reason they needed someone with blue eyes, pure and simple. It’s a
well-done ad that would’ve crushed it on its own, without the insane controversy stirred up by libtards overanalyzing everything to death. I don’t believe for a second the ad campaign was meant to cause this ridiculous drama. Even with my understanding of the left’s insanity, I wouldn’t have predicted this reaction beyond a few whack jobs on TikTok.

And before anyone starts parroting CNN or MSNBC’s latest spin, let’s be clear, Republicans didn’t blow this thing up. Those outlets know their audiences are gullible morons, so they twist the narrative, because their polling must be showing it's not working out for them, again. Now, some of them acting like they didn’t start the controversy with their “some are saying” bullshit. Who’s “some”? Nobody ever knows, lol.

My issue with your take is that I think you fell into the same trap as the left, overanalyzing something blatantly simple and obvious, slapping on some perceived intent like it's obvious or even fact. Libtards take that tactic to the extreme. That’s why I pinned you as one of them, despite your earlier jab at their nonsense. I do remember scratching my head because I thought I had seen previous comments you wrote I completely agreed with, so I guess I was at least remembering that correctly.
For a second there, I forgot what you had said to warrant my response. You didn't write one thing I disagree with, this analysis was pretty much dead on. I don’t have time right now to dig up the comment I took issue with, but if memory serves, it was your assumptions about the ad creators and/or the top dogs at American Eagle, their intended message, and their motivations that got under my skin. Advertising isn’t like politics with its endless agendas and power grabs in the mix of their messaging. Advertising has one mission: sell, sell, sell with the exception of the dumbasses that thought including politics and the woke message would help drive sales.

This clothing ad worked because the creator went back to basics. Sydney Sweeney was the perfect choice, not for some shady reason, but because she had the look, the voice, and the acting skills to pull off the vision, all tied to that brilliant tagline, “my jeans are blue.” That line was the whole reason they needed someone with blue eyes, pure and simple. It’s a
well-done ad that would’ve crushed it on its own, without the insane controversy stirred up by libtards overanalyzing everything to death. I don’t believe for a second the ad campaign was meant to cause this ridiculous drama. Even with my understanding of the left’s insanity, I wouldn’t have predicted this reaction beyond a few whack jobs on TikTok.

And before anyone starts parroting CNN or MSNBC’s latest spin, let’s be clear, Republicans didn’t blow this thing up. Those outlets know their audiences are gullible morons, so they twist the narrative, because their polling must be showing it's not working out for them, again. Now, some of them acting like they didn’t start the controversy with their “some are saying” bullshit. Who’s “some”? Nobody ever knows, lol.

My issue with your take is that I think you fell into the same trap as the left, overanalyzing something blatantly simple and obvious, slapping on some perceived intent like it's obvious or even fact. Libtards take that tactic to the extreme. That’s why I pinned you as one of them, despite your earlier jab at their nonsense. I do remember scratching my head because I thought I had seen previous comments you wrote I completely agreed with, so I guess I was at least remembering that correctly.
For a second there, I forgot what you had said to warrant my response. You didn't write one thing I disagree with, this analysis was pretty much dead on. I don’t have time right now to dig up the comment I took issue with, but if memory serves, it was your assumptions about the ad creators and/or the top dogs at American Eagle, their intended message, and their motivations that got under my skin. Advertising isn’t like politics with its endless agendas and power grabs in the mix of their messaging. Advertising has one mission: sell, sell, sell with the exception of the dumbasses that thought including politics and the woke message would help drive sales.

This clothing ad worked because the creator went back to basics. Sydney Sweeney was the perfect choice, not for some shady reason, but because she had the look, the voice, and the acting skills to pull off the vision, all tied to that brilliant tagline, “my jeans are blue.” That line was the whole reason they needed someone with blue eyes, pure and simple. It’s a
well-done ad that would’ve crushed it on its own, without the insane controversy stirred up by libtards overanalyzing everything to death. I don’t believe for a second the ad campaign was meant to cause this ridiculous drama. Even with my understanding of the left’s insanity, I wouldn’t have predicted this reaction beyond a few whack jobs on TikTok.

And before anyone starts parroting CNN or MSNBC’s latest spin, let’s be clear, Republicans didn’t blow this thing up. Those outlets know their audiences are gullible morons, so they twist the narrative, because their polling must be showing it's not working out for them, again. Now, some of them acting like they didn’t start the controversy with their “some are saying” bullshit. Who’s “some”? Nobody ever knows, lol.

My issue with your take is that I think you fell into the same trap as the left, overanalyzing something blatantly simple and obvious, slapping on some perceived intent like it's obvious or even fact. Libtards take that tactic to the extreme. That’s why I pinned you as one of them, despite your earlier jab at their nonsense. I do remember scratching my head because I thought I had seen previous comments you wrote I completely agreed with, so I guess I was at least remembering that correctly.
 
Back
Top