I saw Trump made a brief comment about a girl named Sydney Sweeney how had done an advertisement for the "American Eagle" brand of jeans. Sydney Sweeney is said to be a Repulican, so when Trump was asked about her in connection to this ad she did for "American Eagle" which become extremely controversial across America, Trump said, pretty much, "All I am interested in is if she votes Republican, and she does, so that's great !"
Sydnery Sweeney's ad for American Eagle jeans show a young female who is said to exemplify the aesthetic standards of the Blonde (long-haired), pale-skinned, blue/ (light green grey) eyes, firm perky breasts, tastefully sinuous, curvaceous figure and facial features (eye shape, nasal structure, jawline extension and so on that define a beautiful young Western woman. The most beautiful of these women are "Nordic" which means they are natives of Scandinavia. Sweden, for example, is well known for it large population of beautiful, blue-eyed blonde women.
I have no problem with stating that I believe beauty is an objective quality in things - that includes young women. That means the traditional aesthetic criteria the West have used to define what is and is not beauty in women is pretty much correct. WESTERN female beauty TRUMPS BLACK AFRICAN/ABORIGINAL/HAITIAN/INDIAN BEAUTY (and ditto of all the other darkly pigmented races) and it TRUMPS ASIAN and MONGOLIAN FEMALE BEAUTY as well
So, in this ad that Sydney Sweeney did for "American Eagle" jeans. Sydney Sweeney is, I think, intended, to exemplify the aesthetic standards that are set for female beauty in the West. We are supposed believe that she is a "HOTTIE". Add the end of the ad she says ostensibly referring to the "American Eagle" jeans.... "GREAT JEANS." Two seconds later anyone with half a brain, figures out the play on words, which is "GREAT GENES" This is immediately linked to White supremacist that the superiority of the White Western race is something that is "in the blood", i.e that is primarily genetically, determined. While it is true that the environment we are raised in from infancy has a certain variable effect on the way people develop, there is no doubt, now, that a person's inherited genetic make-up are likely very influential in shaping a person's physical and mental abilities,, physiology and anatomy.
In America it is still TABOO to openly discuss any aspect of the connection between race and genetic. So when this Sydney Sweeney ad was released the left went right off it's tiny pea brain, because this ad made a point of "saying" the reason this girl is a White American "HOTTIE" is due to her superior White genes.
What really confused mean when I watch this add is that Sydney Sweeney has eyes that are clearly Eurasian or even East Asian shaped into a slit-type form. Westerners do not have eyes that appear slanted or "slit" eye shape. Also her hair is obviously dyed because the upper layers are dark brown but change to blonde about halfway down. If you are wanting to present a woman who is truly beautiful, artificial hair-colouring is a big NO !, NO! Also, although this girl is a White America, in the ad her skin tone is rendered somewhat ambiguous - it certainly doesn't catch your eye as the pallid White that it actually is in real life.
Here is the ad - check it out for yourself....
Http:/youtu.be/AK8s3iqL99c?=xeK98StttLnHSWI
Unfortunately that link doesn't work, but it's easy to find on You Tube
What is is is trhat I don't get why they were using this girl, Sydney Sweeney to represent a White Western Hottie in order to set up their kicker line...GREAT JEAN/GREAT GENES and trigger a major controversy over the Taboo topic of the role genes play and White superiority (in this case the superiority of White Western female beauty). If the wanted to use a top- grade White, Western, American HOTTIE to do that ad, they would have had 1000s to choose from. So why they chose Sydney Sweeney, who does not even look like a While, American girl, I don't Know.
Sydnery Sweeney's ad for American Eagle jeans show a young female who is said to exemplify the aesthetic standards of the Blonde (long-haired), pale-skinned, blue/ (light green grey) eyes, firm perky breasts, tastefully sinuous, curvaceous figure and facial features (eye shape, nasal structure, jawline extension and so on that define a beautiful young Western woman. The most beautiful of these women are "Nordic" which means they are natives of Scandinavia. Sweden, for example, is well known for it large population of beautiful, blue-eyed blonde women.
I have no problem with stating that I believe beauty is an objective quality in things - that includes young women. That means the traditional aesthetic criteria the West have used to define what is and is not beauty in women is pretty much correct. WESTERN female beauty TRUMPS BLACK AFRICAN/ABORIGINAL/HAITIAN/INDIAN BEAUTY (and ditto of all the other darkly pigmented races) and it TRUMPS ASIAN and MONGOLIAN FEMALE BEAUTY as well
So, in this ad that Sydney Sweeney did for "American Eagle" jeans. Sydney Sweeney is, I think, intended, to exemplify the aesthetic standards that are set for female beauty in the West. We are supposed believe that she is a "HOTTIE". Add the end of the ad she says ostensibly referring to the "American Eagle" jeans.... "GREAT JEANS." Two seconds later anyone with half a brain, figures out the play on words, which is "GREAT GENES" This is immediately linked to White supremacist that the superiority of the White Western race is something that is "in the blood", i.e that is primarily genetically, determined. While it is true that the environment we are raised in from infancy has a certain variable effect on the way people develop, there is no doubt, now, that a person's inherited genetic make-up are likely very influential in shaping a person's physical and mental abilities,, physiology and anatomy.
In America it is still TABOO to openly discuss any aspect of the connection between race and genetic. So when this Sydney Sweeney ad was released the left went right off it's tiny pea brain, because this ad made a point of "saying" the reason this girl is a White American "HOTTIE" is due to her superior White genes.
What really confused mean when I watch this add is that Sydney Sweeney has eyes that are clearly Eurasian or even East Asian shaped into a slit-type form. Westerners do not have eyes that appear slanted or "slit" eye shape. Also her hair is obviously dyed because the upper layers are dark brown but change to blonde about halfway down. If you are wanting to present a woman who is truly beautiful, artificial hair-colouring is a big NO !, NO! Also, although this girl is a White America, in the ad her skin tone is rendered somewhat ambiguous - it certainly doesn't catch your eye as the pallid White that it actually is in real life.
Here is the ad - check it out for yourself....
Http:/youtu.be/AK8s3iqL99c?=xeK98StttLnHSWI
Unfortunately that link doesn't work, but it's easy to find on You Tube
What is is is trhat I don't get why they were using this girl, Sydney Sweeney to represent a White Western Hottie in order to set up their kicker line...GREAT JEAN/GREAT GENES and trigger a major controversy over the Taboo topic of the role genes play and White superiority (in this case the superiority of White Western female beauty). If the wanted to use a top- grade White, Western, American HOTTIE to do that ad, they would have had 1000s to choose from. So why they chose Sydney Sweeney, who does not even look like a While, American girl, I don't Know.
Last edited:
