Trump cancels plans to send federal troops to San Francisco for immigration crackdown

Hey stupid. Go look at the link. I copied and pasted from there.

So your answer should have been "no".

Whose argument do you suppose this reinforces?

Also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of]) [form of])"

It appears to me that you are attempting to use a non sequitur to derail my point that your justification for your surmise that the POTUS was likely to accept bribes because he is a felon.

Therefore, logically, I believe it was a non sequitur (also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of]) for you to present such a flimsy argument.
 
Glad you acknowledge that your premise was a non sequitur. Kudos.



So you say. Petty? Crime must pay pretty well, if that's the case.
A premise, by definition, cannot be a non sequitur. As I stated, non sequitur refers to an inference. I suspect you know nothing about logic.
 
I saw a report the other day that the only big city dying faster than SF is NYC.

Some here might also remember that I long ago predicted the collapse of NYC.
 
Back
Top