Trump Campaign Changed Ukraine Platform & Lied About It

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
Top Trump aide Paul Manafort swore that the campaign had nothing to do with a radical change in the official Republican Party position on Ukraine. He was lying.

The Trump campaign went out of its way to dramatically alter the Republican Party’s official position on Ukraine—against the wishes of GOP hawks and despite senior Trump aide Paul Manafort’s insistence that they weren’t involved. The move, first reported by The Washington Post, alienated Republicans who have made up the party’s foreign policy base for decades, and indicates that the Trump campaign has a particular interest in Ukraine, where Manafort had previously worked for a pro-Putin leader...

Manafort said on NBC’s Meet the Press this past weekend that the change in language on Ukraine “absolutely did not come from the Trump campaign.” But this account is contradicted by four sources in the room, both for and against the language...

Eric Brakey, a Maine delegate who identifies as a non-interventionist, said he supported the change, which was pushed in part by the Trump campaign.

“Some staff from the Trump campaign came in and… came back with some language that softened the platform,” Brakey told The Daily Beast. “They didn’t intervene in the platform in most cases. But in that case they had some wisdom to say that maybe we don’t want to be calling… for very, very clear aggressive acts of war against Russia.”

According to two Republican delegates, the Trump campaign’s efforts were led in part by J.D. Gordon, a Trump campaign official and a former spokesman at the Pentagon. During the meeting, pro-Cruz delegate Diane Denman proposed language that called for “providing lethal defensive weapons” to Ukraine. Her amendment was put on hold so that Republican staff could work with Denman on the language. What followed was a back and forth between Denman and the Trump campaign, according to Denman.

“They were over sitting in chairs at the side of the room,” Denman said of two men who said they working for the Trump campaign, one of whom was Gordon. “When I read my amendment, they got up and walked over and talked to the co-chairmen and they read it. That’s when I was told that it was going to be tabled.”

(Continued)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...n-changed-ukraine-platform-lied-about-it.html


Trump for Institutionalization 2016
 
Didn't Manafort shill for another of Putin's puppets before he was assigned to help Trumpovitch betray America?

Treason. Trump for prison.
 
Top Trump aide Paul Manafort swore that the campaign had nothing to do with a radical change in the official Republican Party position on Ukraine. He was lying.

The Trump campaign went out of its way to dramatically alter the Republican Party’s official position on Ukraine—against the wishes of GOP hawks and despite senior Trump aide Paul Manafort’s insistence that they weren’t involved. The move, first reported by The Washington Post, alienated Republicans who have made up the party’s foreign policy base for decades, and indicates that the Trump campaign has a particular interest in Ukraine, where Manafort had previously worked for a pro-Putin leader...

Manafort said on NBC’s Meet the Press this past weekend that the change in language on Ukraine “absolutely did not come from the Trump campaign.” But this account is contradicted by four sources in the room, both for and against the language...

Eric Brakey, a Maine delegate who identifies as a non-interventionist, said he supported the change, which was pushed in part by the Trump campaign.

“Some staff from the Trump campaign came in and… came back with some language that softened the platform,” Brakey told The Daily Beast. “They didn’t intervene in the platform in most cases. But in that case they had some wisdom to say that maybe we don’t want to be calling… for very, very clear aggressive acts of war against Russia.”

According to two Republican delegates, the Trump campaign’s efforts were led in part by J.D. Gordon, a Trump campaign official and a former spokesman at the Pentagon. During the meeting, pro-Cruz delegate Diane Denman proposed language that called for “providing lethal defensive weapons” to Ukraine. Her amendment was put on hold so that Republican staff could work with Denman on the language. What followed was a back and forth between Denman and the Trump campaign, according to Denman.

“They were over sitting in chairs at the side of the room,” Denman said of two men who said they working for the Trump campaign, one of whom was Gordon. “When I read my amendment, they got up and walked over and talked to the co-chairmen and they read it. That’s when I was told that it was going to be tabled.”

(Continued)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...n-changed-ukraine-platform-lied-about-it.html


Trump for Institutionalization 2016
It is hardly a surprise this man lies, his jobs involves polishing turds.
 
Didn't Manafort shill for another of Putin's puppets before he was assigned to help Trumpovitch betray America?

Treason. Trump for prison.

I wonder why Manafort disconnected his phone?
images.jpghn_.jpg


"Manafort’s work for Yanukovych and the Party of Regions was kept out of the media as Ukrainian politicians feared of accusations of meddling by the United States. They signed confidentiality agreements to protect the arrangement, and Manafort would not comment on his cooperation with Ukrainian politicians. He refused interviews from Ukrainian journalists, saying he was not a public figure. It’s unclear if Manafort speaks Ukrainian or Russian, but reporters would spot him at the posh InterContinental Kyiv hotel.

The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment for this story, and the phone number listed for Manafort’s lobbying office has been disconnected."

http://www.politifact.com/global-ne...rt-donald-trumps-top-adviser-and-his-ti/Trump for Prison 2016
 
the Ukraine language is much better -Trump or no Trump.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych and the Party of Regions was kept out of the media as Ukrainian politicians feared of accusations of meddling by the United States
.Manafort was working for US interests.
 
the Ukraine language is much better -Trump or no Trump.

.Manafort was working for US interests.

He lobbied for Mobotu Sese Seko and Ferdinand Marcos. He needs to find a better class of client.

Mobutu became notorious for corruption, nepotism, and the embezzlement of between US$4 billion and $15 billion during his reign, as well as extravagances such as Concorde-flown shopping trips to Paris.[SUP][5][/SUP] Mobutu presided over the country for over three decades, a period of widespread human rights violations. He has been described as the "archetypal African dictator."[SUP][5][/SUP]
 
He lobbied for Mobotu Sese Seko and Ferdinand Marcos. He needs to find a better class of client.

Mobutu became notorious for corruption, nepotism, and the embezzlement of between US$4 billion and $15 billion during his reign, as well as extravagances such as Concorde-flown shopping trips to Paris.[SUP][5][/SUP] Mobutu presided over the country for over three decades, a period of widespread human rights violations. He has been described as the "archetypal African dictator."[SUP][5][/SUP]

I'm sure that tsuke and Loyal Lapdoggy Hack Hussein regard all those men as good strong leaders.
 
He lobbied for Mobotu Sese Seko and Ferdinand Marcos. He needs to find a better class of client.

Mobutu became notorious for corruption, nepotism, and the embezzlement of between US$4 billion and $15 billion during his reign, as well as extravagances such as Concorde-flown shopping trips to Paris.[SUP][5][/SUP] Mobutu presided over the country for over three decades, a period of widespread human rights violations. He has been described as the "archetypal African dictator."[SUP][5][/SUP]
meh. he's effective at working strongmen. Marcos was a US stooge too. did you ever see Doonesbury where Duke is running some
fictional Central Asian '....stan' figure's PR?. It's not a pretty sight but somebody has to do it.
 
Back
Top