Trump Calls For TERMINATION of the Constitution After Elon Musk’s

[anonymoose]

When you can articulate your position, I'll discuss it. Right now, you are just trolling.

OK sport. Just delete the parts you consider to be trolling and engage me.

I guess you'd prefer we just deregulate the oil industry so they can make more money. Is that the deal?

Nowhere did I say that or even imply it. Who's the troll here?

Domestic oil production is essentially the same as it was during Trumps administration.

Irrelevant. Never did I state he was trying to decrease present oil production. . It's obvious you're avoiding the question.

So I'll ask again, and let's see if you can give an actual, fact based answer...... how is Biden hurting domestic oil production,

He's not because he can't

and why isn't it down?

Because he can't change what's already in place. He's hindering future oil production and I already stated why. Not present oil production.

You can't.

And I won't. He's powerless to hurt present oil production. But he's already taken measures to hinder future oil production *to fight climate change*. LOL

So I can assume you are saying this for one reason. You are a partisan hack that hates Biden.

If I was a partisan hack then why have I consistently derided Trump's behavior and I considered him the third worst candidate in the entire dem and repub field in '16. I hated both McCain and Bush when they were the main contenders in '00 which drove me to register as a not republican. And I was dead right about Bush when I was in the minority of being against the Iraq debacle before it started. That's not partisan.
You, however, have never since I've known you to criticize an obviously bad dem policy.

See, two can play the game. If you want to be serious, then get serious.

Looks like you're the only one playing. Have fun playing alone.

If you want to troll... so be it.

Once again, all you have to do is delete whatever you consider trolling and engage. Or at minimum show me what is trolling. Because you know all good and well , much of what I say is true. Some is opinion.
I answered you're "ask again" question, let's see if you can answer mine: If Brandon wants to curtail domestic oil production in the cause of combating "climate change", why did he beg Russia before the war, and OPEC to increase production? Why did he suspend sanctions on Venezuela and allow Exxon to resume business there? If he really believed decreasing production would make for cooler weather combat climate change, why does he beg OPEC and adversaries to increase theirs?
Why wouldn't he do the opposite and ask them to reduce their oil production so they too could combat climate change? Isn't a worldwide problem?
Good luck. But I don't expect any solid answers from you.

 

[Concart]

OK sport. Just delete the parts you consider to be trolling and engage me.
Nowhere did I say that or even imply it. Who's the troll here? Irrelevant. Never did I state he was trying to decrease present oil production. . It's obvious you're avoiding the question. He's not because he can't Because he can't change what's already in place. He's hindering future oil production and I already stated why. Not present oil production. And I won't. He's powerless to hurt present oil production. But he's already taken measures to hinder future oil production *to fight climate change*. LOL If I was a partisan hack then why have I consistently derided Trump's behavior and I considered him the third worst candidate in the entire dem and repub field in '16. I hated both McCain and Bush when they were the main contenders in '00 which drove me to register as a not republican. And I was dead right about Bush when I was in the minority of being against the Iraq debacle before it started. That's not partisan.
You, however, have never since I've known you to criticize an obviously bad dem policy.
Looks like you're the only one playing. Have fun playing alone. Once again, all you have to do is delete whatever you consider trolling and engage. Or at minimum show me what is trolling. Because you know all good and well , much of what I say is true. Some is opinion.
I answered you're "ask again" question, let's see if you can answer mine: If Brandon wants to curtail domestic oil production in the cause of combating "climate change", why did he beg Russia before the war, and OPEC to increase production? Why did he suspend sanctions on Venezuela and allow Exxon to resume business there? If he really believed decreasing production would make for cooler weather combat climate change, why does he beg OPEC and adversaries to increase theirs?
Why wouldn't he do the opposite and ask them to reduce their oil production so they too could combat climate change? Isn't a worldwide problem?
Good luck. But I don't expect any solid answers from you.

LOL, so he's hindering future oil production because we want to be less dependent on oil. DUH.

When you refer to the President as 'Brandon' that makes you a troll. It is what it is. I do not consider the policy bad.

 

[anonymoose]

LOL, so he's hindering future oil production because we want to be less dependent on oil. DUH.

But more dependent on foreign oil when we need it or when the price increases are one of the causes of inflation. Again, if he was truly serious in his belief that decreasing oil production would solve GW he'd pressure OPEC, Russia and Venezuela to decrease, not increase their production, (by his twisted logic , of course). That tells me two things if he's cognizant: 1. he doesn't really believe that and
2. he wants to penalize, hinder, whathaveyou, N. American oil producers for some unbeknownst reason. There's just no other way I can logically explain his actions IF he's cognizant.
~OR~ a distinct possibility... he's just a very confused senile old man beyond his physical years that can't remember what his energy policy is from one day to the next.

When you refer to the President as 'Brandon' that makes you a troll.

Then all you had to do is delete it like I said. I notice the MAGAts don't have a problem engaging in conversation with those that refer to Trump as 'dump' , 'orangutan', etc.
Sensitive, are we? No wonder leftists were the original snowflakes back in '16.
I think you're making an excuse to not engage in an argument you can't possibly win. The usual when I ask uncomfortable questions around here.

I do not consider the policy bad.

I knew you wouldn't/couldn't answer my 'ask again' questions. No matter how much you think I'm trolling, those are very legitimate questions. There is no logical answer to them no matter how much you happen to like Brandon Biden. There simply is none. You can't even twist it. I saw you didn't consider his energy policy as 'good'.
Just wondering how is it "not bad"?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Let’s terminate the Republican Party and keep the constitution

Agreed on keeping the Constitution. No need to help the Republican Party destroy itself. They've been doing it for over 25 years and are nearly finished.

How 1/6 is resolved will determine if they survive or implode.

 

[anonymoose]

The oil companies own thousands of leases. Having them gives them tax breaks.

The 'tax breaks' are nothing more than a deductible expense. Not a tax break.

Many they will probably never use. They want more because it increases the value of the company making borrowing

Well that's a new one. a lease is a liability on a company's balance sheet. How does increasing the liability of a company increase it's value? It doesn't. It decreases it.

All costs of leases are deductible from purchase prices, maintaining leases, legal costs etc.

Duh. That's true in any business. Those are all costs. All costs are tax deductible. Actually the federal govt. makes money from those leases whether oil is found or not. A win - win for everybody