Trump arrested; "inappropriate contact with a 16-year-old girl" alleged
- Thread starter Legion Troll
- Start date
I found ten times, not 26. But anyway, cons kept talking about Clinton and Epstein until it was discovered that Trump and Epstein were even closer. Now all of a sudden it's no big deal.
"Epstein’s “little black book” was stolen by a former employee in 2004. The book, nicknamed "The Holy Grail" by the employee, revealed the name of Donald Trump and listed “14 phone numbers including emergency numbers, car numbers, and numbers to Trump's security guard and houseman.”
http://www.dailywire.com/news/5556/...bout-trump-and-sex-slave-amanda-prestigiacomo
Legionthecat
Double Platinum Catroll
Lock him up!
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
An anonymous “Jane Doe” filed a federal lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of raping her in 1994 when she was thirteen years old.
Jane Doe says that as a thirteen year old, she was enticed to attend parties at the home of Jeffrey Epstein with the promise of money modeling jobs.
Epstein is a notorious “billionaire pedophile” who is now a Level 3 registered sex offender - the most dangerous kind, “a threat to public safety” — after being convicted of misconduct with another underage girl.
Jane Doe says that Trump “initiated sexual contact” with her on four occasions in 1994. Since she was thirteen at the time, consent is not an issue. If Trump had any type sexual contact with her in 1994, it was a crime.
On the fourth incident, she says Trump tied her to a bed and forcibly raped her, in a “savage sexual attack,” while she pleaded with him to stop. She says Trump violently struck her in the face. She says that afterward, if she ever revealed what he had done, Trump threatened that she and her family would be “physically harmed if not killed.”
Trump’s lawyer says the charges are “categorically untrue, completely fabricated and politically motivated.”) Proof comes later, at trial. But the November election will come well before any trial.
The rape case must be viewed through the lens of Trump’s longstanding and well documented contempt for women. Men who objectify women are more likely to become perpetrators of sexual violence, just as one with a long history of overtly racist comments is more likely to commit a hate crime.
Trump has relished calling women “dogs,” “slobs” and “pigs,” and cyberstalked and derided journalist Megyn Kelly for having the temerity to ask him to defend his own words. He threw out the most misogynist of attacks, attempting to undermine her professionalism by accusing her of menstruating.
He’s cruelly ridiculed the appearance of a female opponent (Carly Fiorina) and an opponent’s wife (Heidi Cruz). His campaign even openly acknowledged that it disqualified all women for consideration as his vice-president.
Trump has a long history of debasing women he’s worked with, crossing the line on a regular basis. He’s taken lifelong joy in objectifying women, including his proclamation: “Women, you have to treat ‘em like shit.”
This cannot be ignored. Decades of abusive language does not make him a rapist. But it does show us who the man is: a callous, meanspirited misogynist who no sane person would leave alone with their daughter.
Two prior women have accused Trump, in court documents, of actual or attempted sexual assault.
If the Bill Cosby case has taught us anything, it is to not disregard rape cases against famous men.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html
Jane Doe says that as a thirteen year old, she was enticed to attend parties at the home of Jeffrey Epstein with the promise of money modeling jobs.
Epstein is a notorious “billionaire pedophile” who is now a Level 3 registered sex offender - the most dangerous kind, “a threat to public safety” — after being convicted of misconduct with another underage girl.
Jane Doe says that Trump “initiated sexual contact” with her on four occasions in 1994. Since she was thirteen at the time, consent is not an issue. If Trump had any type sexual contact with her in 1994, it was a crime.
On the fourth incident, she says Trump tied her to a bed and forcibly raped her, in a “savage sexual attack,” while she pleaded with him to stop. She says Trump violently struck her in the face. She says that afterward, if she ever revealed what he had done, Trump threatened that she and her family would be “physically harmed if not killed.”
Trump’s lawyer says the charges are “categorically untrue, completely fabricated and politically motivated.”) Proof comes later, at trial. But the November election will come well before any trial.
The rape case must be viewed through the lens of Trump’s longstanding and well documented contempt for women. Men who objectify women are more likely to become perpetrators of sexual violence, just as one with a long history of overtly racist comments is more likely to commit a hate crime.
Trump has relished calling women “dogs,” “slobs” and “pigs,” and cyberstalked and derided journalist Megyn Kelly for having the temerity to ask him to defend his own words. He threw out the most misogynist of attacks, attempting to undermine her professionalism by accusing her of menstruating.
He’s cruelly ridiculed the appearance of a female opponent (Carly Fiorina) and an opponent’s wife (Heidi Cruz). His campaign even openly acknowledged that it disqualified all women for consideration as his vice-president.
Trump has a long history of debasing women he’s worked with, crossing the line on a regular basis. He’s taken lifelong joy in objectifying women, including his proclamation: “Women, you have to treat ‘em like shit.”
This cannot be ignored. Decades of abusive language does not make him a rapist. But it does show us who the man is: a callous, meanspirited misogynist who no sane person would leave alone with their daughter.
Two prior women have accused Trump, in court documents, of actual or attempted sexual assault.
If the Bill Cosby case has taught us anything, it is to not disregard rape cases against famous men.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Lock him up!
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Trump for prison.
CRUCIFY HIM.... CRUCIFY HIM...CRUCIFY HIM.... CRUCIFY HIM~Better one orange man die than all the ppl suffer...
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
What does the company you keep say about the way you live your own moral compass? Among the things you have in common with your friends and colleagues, should the world assume that means the worst acts of one of you? It’s a question a lot of people are asking lately about both Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
Their former associate Jeffrey E. Epstein, a billionaire businessman, is a convicted sex offender. The record on Epstein’s behavior is enough to make your skin crawl. But now that the Prince has been accused of sexual misconduct – and old pal Donald Trump’s history’s of friendship with him has been brought up in the press – the line between guilt and mere guilt by association is up for very public examination.
Beginning in 2008, Epstein served thirteen months for soliciting prostitution, following a lengthy Florida investigation involving allegations of “aggravated assault” of underage girls.
The Palm Beach police department’s 2006 affidavit included “sworn taped statements” from “five victims and seventeen witnesses” regarding unlawful sexual activity with girls, including one as young as fourteen, who were reportedly brought in to give him massages.
Since then, Epstein has reached out-of-court settlements with a number of the alleged victims.
Jane Doe 3 claims that she was procured for Epstein by the late mogul Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine beginning when she was fifteen – and that she was used as a “sex slave” and lent out “for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.”
A motion filed in Florida goes on to say that “One such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).” The documents say that Epstein ordered the now 30 year-old woman to “give the prince whatever he demanded” and “report back on the details.”
Buckingham Palace, which rarely comments on allegations against the royal family, has strenuously denied the claim, saying, “This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”
In 2011, Andrew resigned as “an ambassador for British businesses abroad” after his association with Epstein became known. That same year, Vanity Fair reported that “According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls.”
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/05/he_likes_beautiful_women_as_much_as_i_do_inside_the_latest_stormcloud_of_sex_abuse_allegations/
Their former associate Jeffrey E. Epstein, a billionaire businessman, is a convicted sex offender. The record on Epstein’s behavior is enough to make your skin crawl. But now that the Prince has been accused of sexual misconduct – and old pal Donald Trump’s history’s of friendship with him has been brought up in the press – the line between guilt and mere guilt by association is up for very public examination.
Beginning in 2008, Epstein served thirteen months for soliciting prostitution, following a lengthy Florida investigation involving allegations of “aggravated assault” of underage girls.
The Palm Beach police department’s 2006 affidavit included “sworn taped statements” from “five victims and seventeen witnesses” regarding unlawful sexual activity with girls, including one as young as fourteen, who were reportedly brought in to give him massages.
Since then, Epstein has reached out-of-court settlements with a number of the alleged victims.
Jane Doe 3 claims that she was procured for Epstein by the late mogul Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine beginning when she was fifteen – and that she was used as a “sex slave” and lent out “for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.”
A motion filed in Florida goes on to say that “One such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).” The documents say that Epstein ordered the now 30 year-old woman to “give the prince whatever he demanded” and “report back on the details.”
Buckingham Palace, which rarely comments on allegations against the royal family, has strenuously denied the claim, saying, “This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”
In 2011, Andrew resigned as “an ambassador for British businesses abroad” after his association with Epstein became known. That same year, Vanity Fair reported that “According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls.”
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/05/he_likes_beautiful_women_as_much_as_i_do_inside_the_latest_stormcloud_of_sex_abuse_allegations/