Trump and Epstein Seen Bring Underage Girls on Casino Floor
- Thread starter Trumpet
- Start date
Trumpet
Verified User
Grand Buffoon, apparently you didn't read the article, or you are distorting what's in the article.
When I inquired how he could know, in the absence of identification checks, his response was quick: “I’m a tennis fan, and recognized the woman with Trump, the world’s No. 3 tennis player, Gabriela Sabatini.” He said he knew she was 19 at the time. The other two with them appeared significantly younger, but I never discovered their ages
I’ve Told a Story About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for Years. Suddenly People Are Interested—Including the White House.
Afterward the president asked, “Am I in trouble?”
I agree with Nordie, Hell hath indeed frozen over.
Grand Buffoon, apparently you didn't read the article, or you are distorting what's in the article.
When I inquired how he could know, in the absence of identification checks, his response was quick: “I’m a tennis fan, and recognized the woman with Trump, the world’s No. 3 tennis player, Gabriela Sabatini.” He said he knew she was 19 at the time. The other two with them appeared significantly younger, but I never discovered their ages
I’ve Told a Story About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for Years. Suddenly People Are Interested—Including the White House.
Afterward the president asked, “Am I in trouble?”slate.com
Apparently you just like repeating what some halfwit said. Where in the articles does your speshul ass clown 'witness' says he checked their ID's, Gimp Queen? Do you have have any real principles at all or do you just play sicko tard on the innernetz, due to not being allowed outside?
lol and why use that pic in the story? Is that supposed to be 'proof' or something? lol hilarious. You tards really are desparate.
Grand Buffoon, apparently you didn't read the article, or you are distorting what's in the article.
When I inquired how he could know, in the absence of identification checks, his response was quick: “I’m a tennis fan, and recognized the woman with Trump, the world’s No. 3 tennis player, Gabriela Sabatini.” He said he knew she was 19 at the time. The other two with them appeared significantly younger, but I never discovered their ages
I’ve Told a Story About Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for Years. Suddenly People Are Interested—Including the White House.
Afterward the president asked, “Am I in trouble?”
lol you didn't read it either, so you know you're lying as well. Either that or you're mentally retarded and incompetent. Distinctions without a difference.
lol more dumbassery. No evidence of that either, tard.
^^^This.
Ad homs are legitimate arguments, not all 'fallacies', like what you were taught in Intro to Logic 101, the easy A for stoners and liberal arts fuck offs. You need to tale 102 to get to the more serious courses of studying Logic. But, we know you won't. Babbling stupid shit in Latin doesn't make it legit, dumbass.
AI Overview
In informal logic, ad hominem arguments (attacks directed at a person rather than their argument) are generally considered fallacious because they divert attention from the actual issue being debated
. However, there are specific situations where certain types of ad hominem arguments can be considered legitimate or non-fallacious.
The core idea is that an argument is only fallacious if the personal attack is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. In situations where the individual's character or circumstances are directly relevant to the argument being made or the conclusion being drawn, then a focused and justified ad hominem argument can be considered valid.
Here are some examples where ad hominem arguments might not be fallacious:
- When assessing the credibility of a witness or source of information: If someone's testimony is being relied upon, it can be legitimate to question their honesty or reliability, especially if there's evidence of past deception or bias. For instance, a lawyer in a trial might legitimately bring up a witness's prior conviction for perjury to cast doubt on their credibility, according to Wikipedia.
- When questioning someone's expertise or authority on a topic: If a person is presented as an expert, it may be valid to challenge their claims by highlighting a lack of relevant expertise or a conflict of interest, notes the Number Analytics blog.
- When pointing out hypocrisy or inconsistency: A person advocating for a certain course of action while engaging in contradictory behavior might face a valid ad hominem argument, particularly a tu quoque ("you too") argument. For example, dismissing a doctor's advice to quit smoking because the doctor themselves smokes could be seen as a tu quoque, but if the argument is that the doctor's inconsistency undermines their authority to give that advice, it could be considered a valid critique of their credibility in that specific context.
Last edited:
Sure, sure. Were these Trump's kids? To be fair to Donald he has on several occasions discussed the sad fact he can't date his daughter.
I thought we lost the election because we were too interested in others ("too woke").
Unlike DJT's which is possibly far, far sicker and far, far filthier.
And the worst part of it is that MAGA Voters will have to get really good and comfortable with it.
We're talking about Trump here. A man who cheated on every single wife he's had, sexually attacked a woman in Bergdorffs, is a convicted felon, talked about dating his daughter, mocked the disabled and called veterans who died for our country "suckers". I'd say that's pretty degenerate.
But then I didn't vote FOR all that. You did.
TOP
Retired Teacher
TOP
Retired Teacher
I just did...I'll wait to hear from Gabriela (or her friends) until I judge...
It matters when it involves the abuse of underaged girls. There is no time limit on this grotesque behavior.
Trumpet
Verified User
Why is Crazy Trump trying to avoid releasing the Epstein if he has done nothing wrong??????
Why did Gangster Joe sit on them if he has dine nothing wrong? Why did he pardon his entire family, when they weren't indicted yet? Why did Obama deliberately hand faked evidence over to judges to get a fake warrant to spy on trump? Why did Comey destroy evidence of Hillary's felonies? Why are you tards suddenly being told to parrot this idiot crap?