Trial begins ion Russian hacking

Hello evince,

all the hacking was filmed by a dutch intel group



that group included info about the trolls


they hacked into the security system In the building and the Dutch intel people watched and listened for a couple of years


they knew the names of everyone kids and birthdays by the time they were done



THE DUTCH HAVE TWO YEARS OF TAPE WITH AUDIO


that is how Obama KNEW it was the Russians who did it


the Dutch shared the intel

Yeah that's all fine and well but I think you named this thread wrong.

I am glad to see this trial going forward but:

This trial is about the social media troll farm, not the hacking.
 
all the hacking was filmed by a dutch intel group



that group included info about the trolls


they hacked into the security system In the building and the Dutch intel people watched and listened for a couple of years


they knew the names of everyone kids and birthdays by the time they were done



THE DUTCH HAVE TWO YEARS OF TAPE WITH AUDIO


that is how Obama KNEW it was the Russians who did it


the Dutch shared the intel

Zero evidence to support this nonsense.
 
https://www.law.com/nationallawjour...sian-troll-farm-case/?slreturn=20190819100108



The Judge tells the assholes who have been trying to stretch this out says "If I left it up to you this trial would nt start until 2021"



Americans get to read trail transcripts



Trump is fucked

A federal judge on Monday pressed lawyers to prepare for an April trial in the prosecution of a Russian company charged with interfering in the 2016 presidential election, expressing frustration over delays in a case that was originally brought by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III’s office.
 
The Russian set up a hive of Russian hackers, mostly military to interfere in democratic elections. Their budget was about 1.4 million a month. It was a huge operation. They hacked the Dems and presumably the Repubs. They didn't do much with the Repubs because they were helping Trump. They wanted to help the guy who had the same respect for our laws and government that they did. They chose wisely. The first half of the Mueller report describes what they did well.
There is no argument that they acted to help Trump. They even helped out in campaign rallies and right-wing demonstrations.
 
Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims
https://www.realclearinvestigations...ndercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html


The report uses qualified and vague language to describe key events, indicating that Mueller and his investigators do not actually know for certain whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to WikiLeaks.

The report's timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.

There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.

Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.

U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.

Further, the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.

Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out the social media campaign. Instead it blames, as Mueller said in his closing remarks, "a private Russian entity" known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA).

Mueller also falls far short of proving that the Russian social campaign was sophisticated, or even more than minimally related to the 2016 election. As with the collusion and Russian hacking allegations, Democratic officials had a central and overlooked hand in generating the alarm about Russian social media activity.

John Brennan, then director of the CIA, played a seminal and overlooked role in all facets of what became Mueller’s investigation: the suspicions that triggered the initial collusion probe; the allegations of Russian interference; and the intelligence assessment that purported to validate the interference allegations that Brennan himself helped generate. Yet Brennan has since revealed himself to be, like CrowdStrike and Steele, hardly a neutral party -- in fact a partisan with a deep animus toward Trump.
 
Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims
https://www.realclearinvestigations...ndercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html


The report uses qualified and vague language to describe key events, indicating that Mueller and his investigators do not actually know for certain whether Russian intelligence officers stole Democratic Party emails, or how those emails were transferred to WikiLeaks.

The report's timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.

There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.

Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.

U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.

Further, the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.

Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out the social media campaign. Instead it blames, as Mueller said in his closing remarks, "a private Russian entity" known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA).

Mueller also falls far short of proving that the Russian social campaign was sophisticated, or even more than minimally related to the 2016 election. As with the collusion and Russian hacking allegations, Democratic officials had a central and overlooked hand in generating the alarm about Russian social media activity.

John Brennan, then director of the CIA, played a seminal and overlooked role in all facets of what became Mueller’s investigation: the suspicions that triggered the initial collusion probe; the allegations of Russian interference; and the intelligence assessment that purported to validate the interference allegations that Brennan himself helped generate. Yet Brennan has since revealed himself to be, like CrowdStrike and Steele, hardly a neutral party -- in fact a partisan with a deep animus toward Trump.

It’s inconceivable that Mullet wouldn’t interview Assange.

That is, if it was an *honest investigation* that sought to rule-out alternative theories. I knew right then it was a charade.
 
It’s inconceivable that Mullet wouldn’t interview Assange.

That is, if it was an *honest investigation* that sought to rule-out alternative theories. I knew right then it was a charade.
that and the conjured up "Russian cutout" needed to complete the farce that WIKI is a Russian asset
 
https://www.law.com/nationallawjour...sian-troll-farm-case/?slreturn=20190819100108



The Judge tells the assholes who have been trying to stretch this out says "If I left it up to you this trial would nt start until 2021"



Americans get to read trail transcripts



Trump is fucked

A federal judge on Monday pressed lawyers to prepare for an April trial in the prosecution of a Russian company charged with interfering in the 2016 presidential election, expressing frustration over delays in a case that was originally brought by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III’s office.
 
A federal judge on Monday pressed lawyers to prepare for an April trial in the prosecution of a Russian company charged with interfering in the 2016 presidential election, expressing frustration over delays in a case that was originally brought by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III’s office.
Keep us posted;)
 
https://www.law.com/nationallawjour...sian-troll-farm-case/?slreturn=20190819100108



The Judge tells the assholes who have been trying to stretch this out says "If I left it up to you this trial would nt start until 2021"



Americans get to read trail transcripts



Trump is fucked

A federal judge on Monday pressed lawyers to prepare for an April trial in the prosecution of a Russian company charged with interfering in the 2016 presidential election, expressing frustration over delays in a case that was originally brought by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III’s office.
 
No collusion and insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction.

Case closed-McConnell.

Remember Rosenstein: No Vote Counts or Election Results Were Changed
 
Back
Top