Trey Gowdy Didn’t Even See Documents He Claims Exonerate FBI On Spygate:

Has there been any word from Truthful Nunes? I always go by what he says. :)
It's an "implied" power
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_oversight
oversight and its attendant authority were seen as an inherent power of representative assemblies which enacted public law.[3]

Oversight also derives from the many and varied express powers of the Congress in the Constitution. It is implied in the legislature's authority, among other powers and duties, to appropriate funds, enact laws, raise and support armies, provide for a Navy, declare war, and impeach and remove from office the President, Vice President, and other civil officers. Congress could not reasonably or responsibly exercise these powers without knowing what the executive was doing; how programs were being administered, by whom, and at what cost; and whether officials were obeying the law and complying with legislative intent.

The Supreme Court of the United States has confirmed the oversight powers of Congress,
 
I don't think there is much to the spygate scandal. It's the reverse of the Russia collusion scandal.
 
Come on "noise," your telling us Goudy, who has either spearheaded or been on top of every right wing conspiracy to come down the pike for the last eight years and is currently a key Trump defender, missed something, that he made an omission error in coming up with his conclusion? You can't be that gullible

Your just participating in the dump Goudy movement occurring because he just told the truth that the Trump supporters didn't want to hear. Heard some of the radio demogogues yesterday and they were pushing the scenario that he innocently forgot some of the "facts," the very same "facts" that a month ago Goudy professed to give them their conspiracy, and today, Rudi comes out and says Goudy is now drinking the investigation "kool aid." It couldn't be any more obvious
you should at least read the OP before you ask me questions that are already there/

Basically Gowdy ( lifetime fan of the FBI ) took the classified BRIEFING from Rosenweasel et all at their word.
They refused once again to show the EC citing ..whateverthe fuck ( source security).

He was there as part of the Gang of 8.
If you notice none of the others have commented -so why does Gowdy think he has an inside track
when NO ONE SAW THE SUBPOENA docs ?

This was an attempt at reconciliation.
Next is yet another threat of Impeachment- because DoJ is reacting and stone walling..

Got it? If not I'll check back later

PS Gowdy is obviously mixing up a counterintelligence with a criminal investigation.
He says informants are common in criminal cases -and they are but they are not common in counterintelligence,
where there is no evidence of a crime
 
Last edited:
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) recently suggested the FBI did nothing wrong when it used at least one government informant to secretly collect information on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Public reports indicate, however, that Gowdy never even reviewed the relevant documents on the matter subpoenaed by Congress. In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what documents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

The briefing Gowdy and other lawmakers attended was scheduled at the behest of the White House after the Department of Justice (DOJ) obstructed the subpoena. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein likened HPSCI’s constitutionally obligated congressional oversight of DOJ to “extortion.”

Although Gowdy intimated that the information he received in a briefing last week made clear the FBI did nothing wrong, numerous reports from multiple news outlets indicated that the lawmakers DOJ invited to the briefing were not given access to all of the records HPSCI subpoenaed. Other comments Gowdy made during recent television interviews raise questions about how firm a grasp he has on the investigation and concerns the investigation has raised.

The May 24 briefing was held after tensions flared over the Justice Department’s refusal to comply with the congressional subpoena. DOJ initially claimed President Trump backed its obstruction efforts, a charge refuted by the White House and President Trump himself.

According to government sources who leaked information to The New York Times and Washington Post, the subpoena dealt with an individual who was secretly gathering information on the Trump campaign on behalf of the federal government. Media outlets had reported government officials’ claims they couldn’t comply with the subpoena because revealing any details about the individual would cause loss of life and grave threats to national security. The same media outlets then used leaks from government officials to report the individual’s personally identifying information — up to and including his name.

Along with Gowdy, HPSCI Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) received a classified briefing on the subpoenaed information. Seven other members of Congress did as well. However, multiple press reports indicate the classified briefings reportedly did not satisfy the subpoena.

“Sources tell me Gowdy and Nunes did not receive the documents they requested during the noon meeting at DOJ, despite pleas for openness from [White House chief of staff John] Kelly and [Trump attorney Emmett] Flood,” CNN reporter Sarah Westwood wrote.

Is there a link to your source, or are you just too embarrassed to post one?
 
So, Gowdy hasn’t seen all the pertinent documents.

Yet, it’s his judgment everything was kosher in Spy Gate. That makes for good red meat to the Swamp fans and Impeachment Enthusiasts—-but it’s kind of goofy. It’s basically Gowdy’s partially, or barely informed opinion, that Halper wasn’t doing anything in the Trump campaign that shouldn’t be expected under the circumstances.

What’s gotten into him? Is he trying to get hired by CNN?

And they are STILL withholding documents from congress. How do they get away with that for so long?

he ran a terrible Bengazi investigation as well -focusing way too much on Hilary role in the limited Bengazi murders.
Not once did he go after her for the proximate cause of terrorist run wild -the US/NATO/Hillary assassination of Qadafi, which turn LIFG ( LIbyan Islamic Fighter Groups -international terrorists) loose all over the country
 
Jesus H. Christ.

People like you are so anxious to defend Donald Trump (and his flight from reality)...

...you are willing to trash anybody...even people from the left.

Some of you guys are so loony...

...I think if Trump ever pleaded guilty...you start to trash him in defense of him.

Wake the hell up.
hey Frank.
where the "abomination" today? you're slipping
 
he ran a terrible Bengazi investigation as well -focusing way too much on Hilary role in the limited Bengazi murders.
Not once did he go after her for the proximate cause of terrorist run wild -the US/NATO/Hillary assassination of Qadafi, which turn LIFG ( LIbyan Islamic Fighter Groups -international terrorists) loose all over the country

Now I understand just why you wouldn't post a source for this piece of garbage. The Federalist no less. Pure garbage
 
Seriously??? :rofl2:

Seriously. What constitutional provision mandates congressional oversight over the executive branch? It is logical to have Congress exercise that power, but I see no specific provision which means we are broadly interpreting federal power.
 
hey Frank.
where the "abomination" today? you're slipping

Hey, Noise. Thanks. Sometimes I get rushed and forget things.

Donald Trump is an abomination...an insult to this nation and to humanity.

I wish I didn't have to say that about him. I used to like him a lot. Took some pictures of him (and Melania) in NYC one time...and thought he was a little stiff, but seemed to be an important, serious guy.

But he is an abomination.
 
you can not possibly be this ^^^^ stupid,
so I'll pass it off as just being triggered like so many other loser liberals

look, she lost, you need to move on

Who is this she you are referring to and why does she matter. the left is dealing with trumps actions. You have to catch up.
 
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) recently suggested the FBI did nothing wrong when it used at least one government informant to secretly collect information on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Public reports indicate, however, that Gowdy never even reviewed the relevant documents on the matter subpoenaed by Congress. In fact, a spokeswoman for Gowdy told The Federalist that the congressman doesn’t even know what documents and records were subpoenaed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

The briefing Gowdy and other lawmakers attended was scheduled at the behest of the White House after the Department of Justice (DOJ) obstructed the subpoena. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein likened HPSCI’s constitutionally obligated congressional oversight of DOJ to “extortion.”

Although Gowdy intimated that the information he received in a briefing last week made clear the FBI did nothing wrong, numerous reports from multiple news outlets indicated that the lawmakers DOJ invited to the briefing were not given access to all of the records HPSCI subpoenaed. Other comments Gowdy made during recent television interviews raise questions about how firm a grasp he has on the investigation and concerns the investigation has raised.

The May 24 briefing was held after tensions flared over the Justice Department’s refusal to comply with the congressional subpoena. DOJ initially claimed President Trump backed its obstruction efforts, a charge refuted by the White House and President Trump himself.

According to government sources who leaked information to The New York Times and Washington Post, the subpoena dealt with an individual who was secretly gathering information on the Trump campaign on behalf of the federal government. Media outlets had reported government officials’ claims they couldn’t comply with the subpoena because revealing any details about the individual would cause loss of life and grave threats to national security. The same media outlets then used leaks from government officials to report the individual’s personally identifying information — up to and including his name.

Along with Gowdy, HPSCI Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) received a classified briefing on the subpoenaed information. Seven other members of Congress did as well. However, multiple press reports indicate the classified briefings reportedly did not satisfy the subpoena.

“Sources tell me Gowdy and Nunes did not receive the documents they requested during the noon meeting at DOJ, despite pleas for openness from [White House chief of staff John] Kelly and [Trump attorney Emmett] Flood,” CNN reporter Sarah Westwood wrote.

Republicans suck!!!
 
Hey, Noise. Thanks. Sometimes I get rushed and forget things.

Donald Trump is an abomination...an insult to this nation and to humanity.

I wish I didn't have to say that about him. I used to like him a lot. Took some pictures of him (and Melania) in NYC one time...and thought he was a little stiff, but seemed to be an important, serious guy.

But he is an abomination.
I completely understand Frank, mindless hate takes a lot of energy to keep it going everyday
 
not all powers are enumerated.

True, but implied powers are those "necessary and proper" for carrying out delegated powers. What delegated power is congressional oversight necessary to carry out?

I am not really arguing about the importance or constitutionality of oversight, but take issue with posters who attack court interpretations of the Constitution granting greater federal power when they don't like it but are fine with accepting broad court interpretations when it is a power they want (oversight, immigration control).
 
True, but implied powers are those "necessary and proper" for carrying out delegated powers. What delegated power is congressional oversight necessary to carry out?

I am not really arguing about the importance or constitutionality of oversight, but take issue with posters who attack court interpretations of the Constitution granting greater federal power when they don't like it but are fine with accepting broad court interpretations when it is a power they want (oversight, immigration control).

Congress is the branch which represents the people [in theory, anyway].

And if the people don’t have oversight, we’re in trouble.
 
So, Gowdy hasn’t seen all the pertinent documents.

Yet, it’s his judgment everything was kosher in Spy Gate. That makes for good red meat to the Swamp fans and Impeachment Enthusiasts—-but it’s kind of goofy. It’s basically Gowdy’s partially, or barely informed opinion, that Halper wasn’t doing anything in the Trump campaign that shouldn’t be expected under the circumstances.

What’s gotten into him? Is he trying to get hired by CNN?

And they are STILL withholding documents from congress. How do they get away with that for so long?

"What's gotten into him?" That's easy, he decided to tell the truth, not that complicated
 
True, but implied powers are those "necessary and proper" for carrying out delegated powers. What delegated power is congressional oversight necessary to carry out?

I am not really arguing about the importance or constitutionality of oversight, but take issue with posters who attack court interpretations of the Constitution granting greater federal power when they don't like it but are fine with accepting broad court interpretations when it is a power they want (oversight, immigration control).
well I look for federalism myself - balance (not separation) of powers as enumerated by the 10th.
Federalism has become overwhelmed by the statists who look for absolutely no limits of US government powers
 
Back
Top