Charlie Rose interviews Assad.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/08/charlie-rose-bashar-al-assad_n_3890294.html
And why is this dangerous ground? Well, because it humanizes Assad and that is the last thing the prowar propagandist would ever want.
If this is an honest attempt to bring real evidence to the forefront then Charlie will play it on a respectable level with Assad. He will allow Assad to voice his position without attempting to twist it.
But will Charlie do that? Or will he make it obvious that he has also been enlisted by the propagandists to serve their purposes.
It's not something that can't be picked up on very easily by even the least politically astute among us.
Getting right to the point, is Charlie with Obama and the war effort or is he against it? We'll know after the interview has aired.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/08/charlie-rose-bashar-al-assad_n_3890294.html
And why is this dangerous ground? Well, because it humanizes Assad and that is the last thing the prowar propagandist would ever want.
If this is an honest attempt to bring real evidence to the forefront then Charlie will play it on a respectable level with Assad. He will allow Assad to voice his position without attempting to twist it.
But will Charlie do that? Or will he make it obvious that he has also been enlisted by the propagandists to serve their purposes.
It's not something that can't be picked up on very easily by even the least politically astute among us.
Getting right to the point, is Charlie with Obama and the war effort or is he against it? We'll know after the interview has aired.