no. It was all done in the open -no secret hearings, and POTUS has representation,and Impeachment was voted on, and the Judiciary Commitee was always used not Intelligence
facile. John Solomon has found documents Hunter was personally in contact with the State Dept to try to influence quashing of the Uk. Burisma investigation. Right after that Biden issued his threat. It's even worse then that but you wouldn't have a clue since you don't folow Solomans investigative reporting
declared erious? it was dropped in the IG'slap. The IG did not know the WB was in contact with Schiff. The IG did not know Schiff referred him the Zaid . The IG did not know the WB worked for Biden.
Everything screams for an investigation. Why are you against transparency in a grave matter like Impeachment?
Not true, BenghaziGate was conducted the exact same way, all of those investigations had private testimony employing the exact same rules that Schiff is using today, in fact, they initiated those rules. In Clinton's impeachment, they didn't have a preliminary inquiry because Starr gave them four years of investigation, all of it conducted behind closed doors. And in that impeachment, just like today, the majority ruled over everything
John Solomon is a talking head, nothing more, of course he has a conspiracy, had any demogogue not have "proof" of something, but even Volker shot down Solomon's fiction in his testimony
The IG did know that the whistleblower had contacted Schiff's office and that Schiff's office recommended he talk to an attorney, and anyone who worked in or near the White House longer than three years had "worked" for Biden just like they are now working for Pence, it is part of their job
Nothing, absolutely nothing, "screams for an investigation," and asking for Biden's son to testify is nothing more than a deflection, it ain't about Biden, it is all about Trump, he is the one who abused his power
