Top US intelligence officials, Trump campaign did not collude with Russia

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said Sunday that top U.S. intelligence officials have told him that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign did not collude with Russia -- attempting to end widespread new reports about potentially compromising, illegal talks with the former Cold War enemy.

“I can assure you, the top levels of the intelligence community have assured me that [the allegation] is not only grossly overstated, but also wrong,” Priebus told “Fox News Sunday.” “They have made it very clear that the story is complete garbage.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...a-story-garbage-tries-to-end-controversy.html
 
Well, didn't expect that so soon but it would be nice if the Director of National Intelligence would make a public statement to that effect.
 
As far as they know right now, maybe.

But I doubt that even they know with absolute certainty. Hence, the investigation will continue until they find solid evidence one way or the other.

But to claim that intel officials told anybody that the Trump campaign definitely did nothing wrong or that any reports of them doing so are garbage, is itself garbage.
 
As far as they know right now, maybe.

But I doubt that even they know with absolute certainty. Hence, the investigation will continue until they find solid evidence one way or the other.

But to claim that intel officials told anybody that the Trump campaign definitely did nothing wrong or that any reports of them doing so are garbage, is itself garbage.

LMAO, so when they say it is possible Russia hacked the DNC, you immediately believed it, but of course now, you're don't.

How do you know they didn't? Where is your proof? Where you there?

You just want to believe anything that fits your views, even if it is fake.
 
LMAO, so when they say it is possible Russia hacked the DNC, you immediately believed it, but of course now, you're don't.

How do you know they didn't? Where is your proof? Where you there?

You just want to believe anything that fits your views, even if it is fake.

Yaya shoots......she scores...!
 
White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said Sunday that top U.S. intelligence officials have told him that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign did not collude with Russia -- attempting to end widespread new reports about potentially compromising, illegal talks with the former Cold War enemy.

“I can assure you, the top levels of the intelligence community have assured me that [the allegation] is not only grossly overstated, but also wrong,” Priebus told “Fox News Sunday.” “They have made it very clear that the story is complete garbage.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...a-story-garbage-tries-to-end-controversy.html

When asked to name his sources, Preibus said NO.

More "do as I say and not as I do" from the GOP.
 
When asked to name his sources, Preibus said NO.

More "do as I say and not as I do" from the GOP.

What? Maybe they are confidential right now or haven't given permission. How is this hypocritical of him?

And you do that all the time, why do you feel you can call others out for what you do all the time?
 
What? Maybe they are confidential right now or haven't given permission. How is this hypocritical of him?

And you do that all the time, why do you feel you can call others out for what you do all the time?

Priebus called out the NYT for using "anonymous sources" then when asked to name his sources, he refused.

Classic "do as I say and not as I do"
 
Priebus called out the NYT for using "anonymous sources" then when asked to name his sources, he refused.

Classic "do as I say and not as I do"

When was he asked?

How can you honestly complain about someone doing as they say and not as they do, when you do it all the time? You expect others to condemn your OP's, but you won't condemn other OP's that are identical to yours.

Classic "do as I say, not as I do"
 
When was he asked?

How can you honestly complain about someone doing as they say and not as they do, when you do it all the time? You expect others to condemn your OP's, but you won't condemn other OP's that are identical to yours.

Classic "do as I say, not as I do"

==================================================================================================================================================================

“They made it very clear that that story in the New York Times is complete garbage,” Priebus replied. “Quite frankly they used different words than that, okay?”

“Who was it that said that, ” Wallace shot back.

“I’m not going to tell you,” Priebus parried.


“Wait a minute, Reince,” a frustrated Wallace exclaimed. “You just complained about unnamed sources. You’re using an unnamed source.”


http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/tha...ting-a-state-run-media/#.WKn4rAxmtUA.facebook
 
LMAO, so when they say it is possible Russia hacked the DNC, you immediately believed it, but of course now, you're don't.

How do you know they didn't? Where is your proof? Where you there?

You just want to believe anything that fits your views, even if it is fake.

trump-wrong.gif


I believe the reports of Russian hacking because there is solid, irrefutable evidence of it and the IC has not backed off those claims.

Also, I am not now disputing any claims made by those same IC officials.

Imam disavowing Rancid Pubis and his exaggerated claim that the IC officials have declared the Trump campaign officially innocent of collusion in the matter.

You are either too thick skulled to see the difference between the two of you are just trying to engage in the typical, standard right wing obfuscation.

Either way, you FAIL.
 
Back
Top