nope. she certainly know the contents -it's a REPORT.Look here you dunce.
Prior to unmasking, all she knows is that an American is conversing with a foreign agent under surveillance.
That would be Dump
OR
One of his crony's.
That's a fact. She was doing her job, more than I can say for the carnival barker you support. You can twist, spin or deflect all you want, it won't change the facts.
This isn't just some raw data floating around. it's contextualized info into a formal form
She had to understand enough of the report to ask for an unmask-right?
The unmask is supposedly to understand fully. BUT you are not supposed to ask for unmasking just because you think there might be more to learn by the name -you have to have a darn good reason to unmask a private citizen.
So you don't just do this on a "feeling"or a whim - it has to be important enough to put privacy at risk
