Again, conservatives operate on facts, evidence, and logic, while liberals operate on emotional hysteria and conspiracy theories.
Your support of the Second Amendment is correct. There. See? Both of us can give each other credit for things that only the other side does.
-Democrats have gotten us into (and horribly screwed up) nearly every war we have been in for the last hundred years.
-Liberals told us that "Literally Hitler" Trump would warmonger us into endless bloodshed. He is doing the exact opposite.
-Democrat incompetence literally created ISIS, and Obama directly supported the Arab Spring, which directly caused the Syrian civil war.
-Democrats knowingly and deliberately armed, aided, and funded terrorists for years...with no conceivable benefit to U.S. interests.
-Liberals supported Obama when he illegally started a war without Congress (but now demand that they should have been given the ability to debate the withdrawal in Congress, after being unconstitutionally denied any input whatsoever on starting said war), emboldened terrorists with his incompetent hesitation, indecision, and by retreating from his "line in the sand."
-Liberals supported Hillary when she bragged about pointlessly destabilizing an entire region of the Middle East in Libya (which ended up costing Americans their lives, which Hillary and Obama then lied about being caused by Americans having the right to question Islam in public), saying, “We came, we saw, he died,” referring to killing Gadhafi once he was already complying with weapons inspectors (contradicting everything Democrats pretended to stand for with Iraq).
-They blame terrorist attacks on America for having the audacity to fight back.
-They have rooted for and aided every enemy this country has faced for the last half-century or more.
-Liberals have spent nearly two decades only pretending to care about the troops and fiscal responsibility when they can be used to undermine national defense, and supported Obama as he needlessly surrendered entire regions of the Middle East to bloodthirsty Islamic savages.
-Liberals are against national defense in general. They oppose building the wall, oppose stopping un-vettable terror-state "refugees," opposed Gitmo, opposed the Patriot Act, opposed Afghanistan (until it could be used to trash and lie about the other war they voted for in Iraq), opposed correctly treating foreign terrorists captured on the battlefield as enemy combatants (instead of as American citizens entitled to trials and lawyers), opposed arming pilots, oppose profiling young, Arab, Muslim males (the group that commits approximately 100% of our terrorist attacks), and caused 9/11.
-Democrats have gotten us into (and horribly screwed up) nearly every war we have been in for the last hundred years.
-Liberals told us that "Literally Hitler" Trump would warmonger us into endless bloodshed. He is doing the exact opposite.
-Democrat incompetence literally created ISIS, and Obama directly supported the Arab Spring, which directly caused the Syrian civil war.
-Democrats knowingly and deliberately armed, aided, and funded terrorists for years...with no conceivable benefit to U.S. interests.
-Liberals supported Obama when he illegally started a war without Congress (but now demand that they should have been given the ability to debate the withdrawal in Congress, after being unconstitutionally denied any input whatsoever on starting said war), emboldened terrorists with his incompetent hesitation, indecision, and by retreating from his "line in the sand."
-Liberals supported Hillary when she bragged about pointlessly destabilizing an entire region of the Middle East in Libya (which ended up costing Americans their lives, which Hillary and Obama then lied about being caused by Americans having the right to question Islam in public), saying, “We came, we saw, he died,” referring to killing Gadhafi once he was already complying with weapons inspectors (contradicting everything Democrats pretended to stand for with Iraq).
-They blame terrorist attacks on America for having the audacity to fight back.
-They have rooted for and aided every enemy this country has faced for the last half-century or more.
-Liberals have spent nearly two decades only pretending to care about the troops and fiscal responsibility when they can be used to undermine national defense, and supported Obama as he needlessly surrendered entire regions of the Middle East to bloodthirsty Islamic savages.
-Liberals are against national defense in general. They oppose building the wall, oppose stopping un-vettable terror-state "refugees," opposed Gitmo, opposed the Patriot Act, opposed Afghanistan (until it could be used to trash and lie about the other war they voted for in Iraq), opposed correctly treating foreign terrorists captured on the battlefield as enemy combatants (instead of as American citizens entitled to trials and lawyers), opposed arming pilots, oppose profiling young, Arab, Muslim males (the group that commits approximately 100% of our terrorist attacks), and caused 9/11.
So are you saying ONLY Republican families and Republican Troops serve and are invested in Wars?
Your absurdly biased article argues that Obama was forced to surrender an entire region of the Middle East to an already defeated enemy...over a SOFA agreement not being renewed yet.
This is the flimsiest pile of horseshit excuse-making I have ever witnessed, literally. That was provably NOT what caused Obama to ignore all the advice of all his advisors and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory (what liberals do)...hence Obama vowing (on blind America-hating ideology alone) for YEARS before the SOFA agreement expired to remove us from Iraq (duh). And gee, why would all of his advisors tell Obama to stay put until the Iraqis were finished being trained to keep ISIS from coming back if the SOFA agreement expiring (a completely meaningless formality) FORCED us to withdraw?
Hilariously stupid attempt at a counterpoint.
Your absurdly biased article argues that Obama was forced to surrender an entire region of the Middle East to an already defeated enemy...over a SOFA agreement not being renewed yet.
This is the flimsiest pile of horseshit excuse-making I have ever witnessed, literally. That was provably NOT what caused Obama to ignore all the advice of all his advisors and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory (what liberals do)...hence Obama vowing (on blind America-hating ideology alone) for YEARS before the SOFA agreement expired to remove us from Iraq (duh). And gee, why would all of his advisors tell Obama to stay put until the Iraqis were finished being trained to keep ISIS from coming back if the SOFA agreement expiring (a completely meaningless formality) FORCED us to withdraw?
Hilariously stupid attempt at a counterpoint.
Obama going against all his advisors to prematurely pull out and hand the region to barbaric Islamic lunatics is...someone other than Obama being wrong. Um, sure.
Yes, veering off to paint your opponent as not adequately considering the whole issue, instead of just debating the points being made, is known as an "ad hominem" fallacy, and it is the very textbook definition of off-topic smearing.
Try again.
