You provided the perfect reply to Expresslanes idiotic post, which is the same recycling, of the stupid argument of 'if i can find an area an EV does not work great in, then EV's are no good'...
In such cold weather, EVs are no good. In inclement weather, EVs are no good. Their limited range is FURTHER reduced by inclement weather. They take a long time to recharge. They are expensive. They have high insurance costs. They are expensive to buy, repair, or maintain. Their own weight makes their maneuverability suck. They do not 'save the planet'. They have limited range. Most of them can't tow.
They suck.
...While ignoring how many CLASSES of ICE vehicle there are
Irrelevant. Divisional error fallacy.
as not every ICE vehicle is ideal or useable in every situation
ICE vehicles are useful in every situation, whether it's a semi hauling goods to market, a lone driver in a compact car commuting, an SUV full of kids heading to the baseball game, a family of four heading out on vacation, a rancher hauling equipment to the field and using it, racing them, mudding, plowing snow, hauling a load of concrete to a jobsite, or simply enjoying the road with a sports car or motorcycle.
ICE vehicles float, fly, and drive on and off roads.
and we could play the same game of showing where an ICE sports car is not great.
It is.
An Ice Sedan is not great.
It is.
An ICE pickup truck is not great, and so on and so on.
It is.
But 'whatabout that EV that cannot do XYZ'!!!! Is a stupid argument that will not die.
Divisional error fallacy.
An EV cannot carry a planeload of travelers to Las Vegas.
An EV cannot haul goods to market effectively.
An EV cannot handle a family of four going on vacation at all well.
An EV cannot go very far without spending hours recharging.
An EV cannot be repaired at home using fairly common tools.
An EV is not an off road vehicle.
An EV is not capable of working in a mine.
There is no practical EV aircraft.
There is no practical EV freighter.
You cannot carry a fuel can to refuel your EV.