Tony Blair’s reputation will be seriously damaged by upcoming Chilcot report

cancel2 2022

Canceled
It has only taken seven bloody years, so we shall see finally!

Tony Blair’s reputation will be seriously damaged by upcoming Chilcot report into the Iraq War and will deliver ‘absolutely brutal’ verdict on Jack Straw and intelligence figures, former minister revealsSir John Chilcot will finally deliver his report on July 6 after seven years


  • Former minister with knowledge of the panel discussions has spoken out
  • Blair, Straw and ex-MI6 boss Sir Richard Dearlove will face 'damage to their reputations'
  • The source has revealed the report is set to savage leading generals too
  • Blair 'won't be let off the hook' over claims he offered Bush assistance
Tony Blair's reputation will be seriously damaged by the upcoming Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War, according to a senior source who has discussed the report with its authors. The report - which will finally be published on July 6 - will also deliver an 'absolute brutal' verdict on the former Labour prime minister, ex-foreign secretary Jack Straw and the former MI6 boss Sir Richard Dearlove, a former government minister added. Mr Blair 'won't be let off the hook' over claims he offered British military assistance to US President George Bush before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

But some of the harshest criticism will be reserved for Mr Straw over the aftermath of the war and the top general who oversaw the city of Basra after it was captured, a source told the Sunday Times. The former minister told the newspaper that British forces 'did make a mess of the aftermath' and will describe the 2007 withdrawal from Basra as 'embarrassing'. 'Serious mistakes' were made by senior generals running Basra and other southern provinces in the country, the report will say and misjudgments were so bad that British troops 'had to be rescued by the Americans'.

The aftermath of the 2003 invasion is expected to be covered at greater length in the report than the build up, but public attention will be much more focussed on the decisions and the period before British forces joined American troops to invade Iraq in 2003 in search of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. Mr Dearlove, who served as the head of MI6 at the time of the invasion, will be criticised for failing to stop Blair's government from putting a 'gloss' on the intelligence surrounding Saddam's apparent stock of weapons.

It led to a British government document - which became known as the 'dodgy dossier' - published in September 2002 that claimed the Iraqi dictator could attack British targets within just 45 minutes. 'The intelligence community should have resisted' the claims in the memo, the Chilcot report will reportedly say. Remarkably, the source close to the report's findings said Mr Blair's cabinet did not have 'the full picture' - suggesting his informal 'sofa style' of government led to mistakes and oversights in the run up to the 2003 invasion.

2D8307A600000578-3602942-image-a-4_1463907148375.jpg

Tony Blair 'won't be let off the hook' over claims he offered British military assistance to US President George Bush
before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a source close to the Chilcot report said
 
Reputation ? He's a reputed war criminal. Is that the reputation you'd like to see ' damaged ' ? You're a war-mongering capitalist propaganda pump yourself.
 
Reputation ? He's a reputed war criminal. Is that the reputation you'd like to see ' damaged ' ? You're a war-mongering capitalist propaganda pump yourself.

I was totally against the 2003 war, ask Christie or Rana they know!! You were probably just out of nappies back then!
 
Bliar's reputation is as a cynical licker of American arses, desperate for money at any cost. How can that be damaged?
 
  • Blair 'won't be let off the hook' over claims he offered Bush assistance


Tony Blair 'won't be let off the hook' over claims he offered British military assistance to US President George Bush
before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, a source close to the Chilcot report said

Blair offered Bush Assistance before the war ?....Isn't this common knowledge and something that has been known even before the invasion ?

The op makes it seem like some revelation of secret information.....
 
I was totally against the 2003 war, ask Christie or Rana they know!! You were probably just out of nappies back then!

Was that before you became aware that the Iraq war was instigated by neoZionists and fought for ' Israel's security ' at the cost of American/UK blood and treasure ?
 
Was that before you became aware that the Iraq war was instigated by neoZionists and fought for ' Israel's security ' at the cost of American/UK blood and treasure ?

Yeh yeh, PNAC, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld blah blah blah. It's been done to death sonny whilst you were still muling and puking in your cot. I thought it was the height of folly to invade Iraq in 2003 and that the real enemy was in Afghanistan. Saddam was a total bastard but he kept the lid on that particular hornet's nest. Whether that would have been the case after his death with his psycho sons Qusay and Uday, who knows?
 
It's a bit of a quandry for neoZionist arses, such as yourself, isn't it. You want to condemn Blair but he was simply using British lives for the Israeli ' cause '.

I wonder if the Chilcott report will nail Blair's Zionist bag-men. More likely they'll get a free pass. I see that one of them, a certain Lord Levy, is still shrieking ' ANTISEMITISM ' , just like you.
 
Last edited:
It's a bit of a quandry for neoZionist arses, such as yourself, isn't it. You want to condemn Blair but he was simply using British lives for the Israeli ' cause '. I wonder of the Chilcott report will nail Blair's Zionist bag-men. More likely they'll get a free pass. I see that one of them, a certain Lord Levy, is still shrieking ' ANTISEMITISM ' , just like you.
Lord Levy is a slimy cunt, just like you!
 
Back
Top