IBDaMann
Well-known member
Cover-up of what? You Democrats are asking the world to believe that the FBI runs "stings" whereby they offer free cash to people on the street, and naturally don't capture it on video.
Too funny.
Tom Homan...
- Thread starter QP!
- Start date
Too funny.
I guess we’ll find out if the lawsuit if successful or in 3 years when there’s a new DOJ, one that doesn’t cover for criminals.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
How is such a rumor even plausible? Homan wasn't a government employee at the time. He couldn't "accept a bribe.".
IBDaMann
Well-known member
No, answer the question. The rumor itself isn't even plausible. Homan wasn't a government employee at the time. He was in no position to be bribed for anything. It would be the same if the FBI ran a "sting" on you. If the FBI were to offer you $50K for the promise of helping them in the future, of what would they GETCHA? Why are you screaming "COVER UP!" instead of scratching your head?
Please explain your logic to me.
I don’t agree with you, that’s my logic.
I want Homan to go through a full investigation. This administration claims to be transparent, if this is a nothing burger, release the FBI recording. Don’t sweep the investigation under the rug. Find out what happened to the $50,000.
Homan doesn’t deny taking the money, so what went on between the FBI and him. We have a right to know.
That is not what the law says. You can accept a bribe with promises of future government service.
He was a probable future government employee, so he was in an obvious position to be bribed. The law does not make your distinction. Beyond that, he laundered $50k in illegal proceeds. That is another group of crimes.
Be careful about accepting illegal deals. You can be arrested in a drugless drug bust. If undercover agents get you to agree to sell them $50k of cocaine, you are committing a crime. There is no need for the cocaine to actually exist.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. That is entirely illogical. If you cannot identify any error in the logic or math, you have to accept the conclusion/result/theorem.
@Scott does the same thing, i.e. he rejects both logic and math. You don't get to just "disagree" when it's not a subjective matter of opinion.
That full investigation happened. OK, now what?
The administration publicly announced the results of the full investigation. The whole thing is just a DNC rumor and there is not even any hint of evidence suggesting any wrongdoing.
OK, now what?
There is no recording to release; existence of said recording was part of the rumor. If there had actually been a "sting" on Homan, the Biden's handlers' administration would have publicized it to the ends of the earth.
Alas, you are just another victim of the latest DNC rumor ... because these kinds of things actually work on the gullible who NEVER ask any questions about what they are ordered to believe. I feel sorry for you.
Homan hasn't dignified the rumor with any comment.