This is literally what is says: Fact Check: Pope Leo XIV never encouraged people to 'be woke' (bold was added by me).No it didn't. You are reading something it does not say.
This is literally what is says: Fact Check: Pope Leo XIV never encouraged people to 'be woke' (bold was added by me).No it didn't. You are reading something it does not say.
It does not claim he did not say the words I quoted. You have, and your citation have no evidence he never said it.This is literally what is says: Fact Check: Pope Leo XIV never encouraged people to 'be woke' (bold was added by me).
Your own link references the quote and says he didn't... But you continue to just push the false narrative. You made an extraordinary claim, you need the extraordinary evidence to back it up, instead you post fact checks that say you are wrong and pretend it backs you up.It does not claim he did not say the words I quoted. You have, and your citation have no evidence he never said it.
Letting men participate in women's sports creates inequities.Woke means becoming aware of the inequities in American society. Those who are not aware of the problems that minorities face in American society are asleep.
But they provide 0 evidence that he never said it. A proper quote should affirm how the information is attained. I can see no way "Snoops" can confirm that he never said something. Not creditable for the claim that he never said it.Your own link references the quote and says he didn't... But you continue to just push the false narrative. You made an extraordinary claim, you need the extraordinary evidence to back it up, instead you post fact checks that say you are wrong and pretend it backs you up.
You made the claim, the necessary evidence is yours. Just as in court we do not prove the negative (that they are not guilty), you must provide evidence that what you claim he actually stated. We have evidence he did not, from your own link. In fact it says he's never suggested such a thing. The only evidence you have to back up your extraordinary claim is something that says the opposite.But they provide 0 evidence that he never said it. A proper quote should affirm how the information is attained. I can see no way "Snoops" can confirm that he never said something. Not creditable for the claim that he never said it.
Correct. Pope McWhitesoxfan didn't say it. lol..Well he didn't say it.
So what are you going to call Democrat racism and perversions now?Term “woke” is already antiquated, when even DeSantis, remember him, couldn’t explain it infront of the cameras it was pretty much dated
Inversion fallacy. It is Republicans who are racists and perverse.So what are you going to call Democrat racism and perversions now?
Suggesttion for the receptionist,But they provide 0 evidence that he never said it. A proper quote should affirm how the information is attained. I can see no way "Snoops" can confirm that he never said something. Not creditable for the claim that he never said it.
LIF. Grow up.Inversion fallacy. It is Republicans who are racists and perverse.
Which inequities?Woke means becoming aware of the inequities in American society. Those who are not aware of the problems that minorities face in American society are asleep.
Racist and perverse when and if they happenSo what are you going to call Democrat racism and perversions now?
Ok, now that is true. I was tricked, I fell for a bad meme. However, there is just as much evidence he said it as there is that he did not say it. 0.You made the claim, the necessary evidence is yours. Just as in court we do not prove the negative (that they are not guilty), you must provide evidence that what you claim he actually stated. We have evidence he did not, from your own link. In fact it says he's never suggested such a thing. The only evidence you have to back up your extraordinary claim is something that says the opposite.
So...Woke.Racist and perverse when and if they happen
Thank you, I try to be.So...Woke.
I know. That's your problem. At least you freely admit it now.Thank you, I try to be.