Thursday at 9 on MSNBC the truth will be told

and yet none of those quotes speak with absolute certainty about Saddam actually owning stockpiles of WMD's. Politicians are very good at choosing their words carefully. Morons like TD are not very good at comprehending the nuances of the language beyond the My Weekly Reader level.

Again... Team Bush told us with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that Saddam had piles of weapons of mass destruction. (which was a lie). Team Bush ALSO told us that Muhammed Atta had met with Saddam's intelligence agents in Prague BEFORE 9/11 (also a lie) pointing to the obvious conclusion that Saddam and OBL were in cahoots even prior to the attacks on the WTC/Pentagon. SOOOO... it's ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that Saddam has stockpiles of WMD's (what the hell did we even NEED old Hans Blix in there for????) and Saddam was allied with Osama.... heck, the next plane over could crash into Cleveland and the smoking gun would be a mushroom cloud! We couldn't WAIT for Blix to tell us what we were already ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN of! We had to attack NOW! YIKES!!! MUSHROOM CLOUDS!!! YIKES!!!! BE VEWY VEWY AFWAID!!!!! Now THAT'S what I call "leadership"! lol

LMAO; you know you are a retard when you keep repeating the same lie over and over again expecting to turn it into a fact. You make the KGB look like amateurs Comrade shit-for-brains.

:thisisgettinggood:
 
How about you do a google search and click them yourself? Why are leftists so fucking clueless and lazy?

How about the fact that I've done the google search and posted the results at least a dozen times and lazy, clueless cons ignore them?

Read the link and refute these, airhead.

Origins: All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction. However, some of the quotes are truncated, and context is provided for none of them — several of these quotes were offered in the course of statements that clearly indicated the speaker was decidedly against unilateral military intervention in Iraq by the U.S. Moreover, several of the quotes offered antedate the four nights of airstrikes unleashed against Iraq by U.S. and British forces during Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, after which Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and Gen. Henry H. Shelton (chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) announced the action had been successful in "degrad[ing] Saddam Hussein's ability to deliver chemical, biological and nuclear weapons."

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp
 
why don't you just watch the documentary and see if it proves what it says it will prove?

Why don't those who said it would provide proof show us the evidence. I have no interest in watching a propaganda piece. Show us the evidence. Surely it is available. Surely those of you who watched it can state what new evidence it is they provided?
 
How about the fact that I've done the google search and posted the results at least a dozen times and lazy, clueless cons ignore them?

Read the link and refute these, airhead.

Origins: All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction. However, some of the quotes are truncated, and context is provided for none of them — several of these quotes were offered in the course of statements that clearly indicated the speaker was decidedly against unilateral military intervention in Iraq by the U.S. Moreover, several of the quotes offered antedate the four nights of airstrikes unleashed against Iraq by U.S. and British forces during Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, after which Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and Gen. Henry H. Shelton (chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) announced the action had been successful in "degrad[ing] Saddam Hussein's ability to deliver chemical, biological and nuclear weapons."

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp


The repetition of the quotes is ridiculous. Not one of them calls for invasion, and most are well before 2003.

What would be more educational for some of the righties in denial would be to look at quotes and speeches from both Democrats AND Republicans on the day of the famous "vote for war," and then argue that they were voting for the invasion of Iraq.
 
these brain addled fools will just deny all the evidence uncovered in the government records.

just like they pretend the court records all the way to the SCOTUS that PROVE the republican party has cheated in elections to win for decades are not completely documented

Oh no,,,cheating in elections?....you mean like this...

18 Former ACORN Workers Have Been Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud
http://tinyurl.com/2ukq4a7
----------------------------------
Nevada Voter Fraud Law Upheld, ACORN Conviction Sustained
http://tinyurl.com/8byst8w
----------------------------------

8 Democrats Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud
http://tinyurl.com/m6v8kfm
---------------------------------
California lawmaker convicted of voter fraud, eight felonies, allowed to take paid leave
http://tinyurl.com/m54feo8
--------------------------------
Democratic officials arrested for voter fraud in Indiana
Names, signatures faked in Indiana to put Obama, Clinton on primary ballot
http://tinyurl.com/l6r2f2j
-------------------------------
Two former Indiana Democratic Party officials have been convicted on multiple counts of election fraud.

http://tinyurl.com/ck9qme8
-------------------------------
four Democratic officials and political operatives have now pleaded guilty to voter fraud-related felony charges in an alleged scheme to steal a New York election.
http://tinyurl.com/k8fgyxw
-------------------------------
Mississippi NAACP leader sent to prison for 10 counts of voter fraud
http://tinyurl.com/3zay9bh
 
same tired old list that righties have spammed the internet with since it became clear to them that they really didn't WANT the Iraq war to be their failure alone.

Only ONE of those democrats (Al Gore after he left office) ever said that there was absolute certainty that Saddam had stockpiles of WMD's. None of those democrats tried to convince America that Saddam and OBL had been in cahoots before 9/11 like Cheney definitely tried to do. Absolute certainty of stockpiles (lie) conflated with a pre-9/11 alliance between Iraq and AQ (another lie) created the immediacy that Bush used to scare America into supporting the invasion of Iraq.

How about the fact that I've done the google search and posted the results at least a dozen times and lazy, clueless cons ignore them?

Read the link and refute these, airhead.

Origins: All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction. However, some of the quotes are truncated, and context is provided for none of them — several of these quotes were offered in the course of statements that clearly indicated the speaker was decidedly against unilateral military intervention in Iraq by the U.S. Moreover, several of the quotes offered antedate the four nights of airstrikes unleashed against Iraq by U.S. and British forces during Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, after which Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and Gen. Henry H. Shelton (chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) announced the action had been successful in "degrad[ing] Saddam Hussein's ability to deliver chemical, biological and nuclear weapons."

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

that clearly indicated the speaker was decidedly against unilateral military intervention in Iraq by the U.S.???
That explains why Bush formed a coalition ....


four nights of airstrikes unleashed against Iraq by U.S. and British forces during Operation Desert Fox in December 1998, after which Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen and Gen. Henry H. Shelton (chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) announced the action had been successful in "degrad[ing] Saddam Hussein's ability to deliver chemical, biological and nuclear weapons."


So you claiming the US was already waging war on Iraq in 1998 ?....and we won ?

Yet the Dem. quotes continued unabated for the next 4 or 5 years....why is that ?

And we degraded his ability to deliver WMD's that maineman insists those Democrats didn't even know for sure existed ? So we were just bombing Iraq....in case, he
'might' have them ?....thats your story.....and you're gonna stick with that ?

The convoluted logic used by pinheads is just mite confusing and ........twisted and, and, and,.....utter bullshit
 
How about the fact that I've done the google search and posted the results at least a dozen times and lazy, clueless cons ignore them?

Then why do you ask me for them dumbass?

Read the link and refute these, airhead.

Refute what retard? What part of "All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction. " do you still not get moron?[/QUOTE]

What UNILATERAL military intervention did we take dumbass? Oh that's right; we DIDN'T.

You leftist morons really are the most dishonestr dunces on the planet.
 

That explains why Bush formed a coalition ....





So you claiming the US was already waging war on Iraq in 1998 ?....and we won ?

Yet the Dem. quotes continued unabated for the next 4 or 5 years....why is that ?

And we degraded his ability to deliver WMD's that maineman insists those Democrats didn't even know for sure existed ? So we were just bombing Iraq....in case, he
'might' have them ?....thats your story.....and you're gonna stick with that ?

The convoluted logic used by pinheads is just mite confusing and ........twisted and, and, and,.....utter bullshit

see anything in there about absolute certainty of the existence of stockpiles?


And so....why was Clinton waging war on Saddam in 1998 ?
And we degraded Saddams ability to deliver WMD we weren't positive he had ?
And the Dems whined on for the next 4 or 5 years about exactly what again ?
I can't wait....be specific and answer the questions...
 
they certainly never whined about the fact that there was absolute certainty about Saddam's stockpiles now, did they?
 
The repetition of the quotes is ridiculous. Not one of them calls for invasion, and most are well before 2003.

You really are one dumb retard; every one of those Democrats, other than those in the previous administration, voted to authorize military action dumbass.

The reason for the repetition is in response to the tired stupid repetition from leftist morons who keep insisting Bush lied about WMDs in a vacuum of reality, the truth and the facts.

But you’re an idiot stuck on stupid and too dense to comprehend much of anything.

What would be more educational for some of the righties in denial would be to look at quotes and speeches from both Democrats AND Republicans on the day of the famous "vote for war," and then argue that they were voting for the invasion of Iraq.

What would a low IQ dunce like you comprehend about much of anything?

Face it; you're stuck on permanent stupid. Embrace it and enjoy the warmth and comfort ignorance brings to dumbasses like you.
 
And so....why was Clinton waging war on Saddam in 1998 ?
And we degraded Saddams ability to deliver WMD we weren't positive he had ?
And the Dems whined on for the next 4 or 5 years about exactly what again ?
I can't wait....be specific and answer the questions...

they certainly never whined about the fact that there was absolute certainty about Saddam's stockpiles now, did they?


Thats your answer ? No answer ?.....Evince and the Dude can do better than that.
 
How about the fact that I've done the google search and posted the results at least a dozen times and lazy, clueless cons ignore them?

Then why be a dishonest asshole and ask me for them?

Read the link and refute these, airhead.

What is there to refute dumbass? What part of “All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction” do you continue to NOT comprehend shit-for-brains?

Only a leftist dumbass stuck on a special brand of stupid can argue that Bush was singular in believing the intelligence and therefore, “lied” about them to get us into a war given those statements, comments from world leaders who joined the coalition and the CIA intelligence that was available at the time.

But in addition, leftist dumbasses stuck on that special brand of stupid want to keep repeating the same stupid lies over and over again as if it will change the course of history that has already past; now if that isn’t the definition of retarded, I don’t know what is.
 
Thats your answer ? No answer ?.....Evince and the Dude can do better than that.

The sad reality for Maintetard is that Evince actually attempts to think once in a while. This moron just erupts with the same stupid claims like a boring leftist robot on steroids.
 
Then why be a dishonest asshole and ask me for them?

What is there to refute dumbass? What part of “All of the quotes listed above are substantially correct reproductions of statements made by various Democratic leaders regarding Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's acquisition or possession of weapons of mass destruction” do you continue to NOT comprehend shit-for-brains?

Only a leftist dumbass stuck on a special brand of stupid can argue that Bush was singular in believing the intelligence and therefore, “lied” about them to get us into a war given those statements, comments from world leaders who joined the coalition and the CIA intelligence that was available at the time.

But in addition, leftist dumbasses stuck on that special brand of stupid want to keep repeating the same stupid lies over and over again as if it will change the course of history that has already past; now if that isn’t the definition of retarded, I don’t know what is.

Imbecile. Context is everything. If I state "This is the saddest story I have ever heard" it could refer to:

1. A news article about a child's disappearance.
2. A barn burning and all the animals inside killed.
3. The opening lines from Ford Madox Ford's novel The Good Soldier.

Pull out your head and try using logic instead of partisan emotion.
 
Back
Top