PROJECTION. So, once again, the question you don't seem to want to answer: what is your solution?
“Three weeks and 39 mass shootings. This is America in 2023”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
PROJECTION. So, once again, the question you don't seem to want to answer: what is your solution?
Your data did everything BUT support your lie filled bullshit. 6% say they stole the guns. A vast majority got them on the street or underground market.
Try reading and comprehending your own data you ranting lunatic.
So again, I will ask: What is your solution.
The data does not support your laughably stupid claim.
The only thing you are proving here is what a dishonest, triggered uneducated dumb fuck you are.
So tell me, what is your solution?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
that's bullshit. each state must abide by the same FEDERAL law on background checks. THE SAME FUCKING LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How so?
Explain how Business Insider is a left-wing source.
Explain how the Reno Gazette Journal is a left-wing source.
Explain how freakin' Reader's Digest is a left-wing source.
I know you won't explain any of it because you are just looking for excuses to avoid dealing with facts and reality.
Because you're a loser.
Oh really? How does it do that?
Oh right, you will never explain that sort of thing.
Instead, you will come up with actual straw man excuses for not engaging in good faith.
Because you're a loser.
Like I said...you can't explain yourself here because everything you believe is a load of horseshit, which is why all you do is look for excuses.
Because you're a loser.
You're the one who screamed about a "stolen election" for two months, then pretended you never did, then when you were shown the actual posts you made alleging a stolen election, you tried to say that YOU didn't say it but that someone else did and you're just repeating it. I guess because you're a sucker who doesn't think for himself, he just repeats things other people say without bothering to do any research or due diligence.
What that bullshit excuse amounts to is that you know you're full of shit.
Yeah, you deleted your own post because you said something incredibly fucking stupid and didn't want anyone else to see it.
Because you're a loser.
OK, so how did the gun get to "the street" or "an underground market"?
Because guns don't just magically appear in those places out of thin air.
I think you know exactly how guns get to "the street"...THEY GET STOLEN AND THEN ARE SOLD ON THE STREET.
Otherwise, how do guns wind up in "the street" or "an underground market"?
OK, you didn't bother clicking on the link and reading it fully because your critical thinking skills should have come into play when you said that they get their guns on "the street" or in "an underground market".
How do the guns get to those places?
All you're talking about are the criminals who were caught and imprisoned after using the gun...you're not talking about how guns got to "the street" or "an underground market" for criminals to buy in the first place.
So it is YOU who can't comprehend data because you're just not smart enough.
Because you're a loser.
It supports it 100%.
You even confirmed it by pointing out that criminal retail gun purchases only amount to 2% of acquired weapons by criminals.
You don't seem to understand words.
Poor anchovies. Ever think about a mandatory sentence for crimes committed with a gun? Five years BEFORE any plea bargain regardless of the age of the perp. Yep, even a ten-year-old. Off to the slammer.
How does a gun get to "the street" for a criminal to buy?
So what is intrusive about the federal background check?
Can you calm down enough to answer, or are you going to deflect and bow out because there's no way for you to prove those background checks are intrusive without sounding guilty of something?
How would you know? You're too chickenshit to even engage with them.
You run your big mouth and then come up with phony excuses for why you won't stand behind any of it.
Because you're a loser.
PROJECTION. But it is fun to watch you deflect and flail when you are proven to be a total, incoherent moron.
You don't believe any of this. Not truly.
You wouldn't stand behind any of it, just like how you didn't stand behind your claims of voter fraud.
Instead, you avoid dealing with my posts because you're just not smart or clever enough to debate them.
So you become shrill and boring.
Any time you are held to account for what you post, you come up with excuses for not standing behind it...like the whole "I never said the election was stolen, I was just repeating people who did".
TD is a bitter old man who hates his life. Is there any doubt he's as nasty in person as he is on JPP?
It's a vicious cycle where he generates disgust in people resulting in them avoiding him and he's bitter about being avoided. When he dies, I'm certain a lot of people will say "Good riddance".