This Ought to End the Global Warming Denialism on the Board

callinectes said:
I don't care if it's man made or not. If it is, it's because we have too many men hanging around. We have added over 2 million people to the population of the U.S. alone since the 2010 census. So unless you want a real humdinger of a war, or you want to let some drug resistant super bug have it's way with you, shut up and embrace the suck.
Click to expand...

I hope Dante's, Darla and Rune all get drug resistant Tuberculosis
 
Celticguy said:
Wonder if any of those articles explains how CO2 can produce greenhouse effect without violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics ?
Click to expand...

Are you retarded?
If anything, the second law supports CO2 as green house gas.
WTF are you talking about?
 
Superfreak said:
Yet the DATA is on my side. Not yours.

The Science is on my side... not yours.

You are the one that denies science... not me.

You are a cowardly little liar... that is proven fact.
Click to expand...

No Simplefreak, the great lie is on your side. You believe the great lie. Why is that?

In Tom's case the answer is twofold and obvious;
1. He is a dumbass. This fact cannot be refuted. His own actions have proven the veracity of this statement.
2. He is a paid shill. Since he is paid to propagate bullshit, he says what he says.

What is your excuse? You are not a dumbass, nor do I think you are an oil shill. So why ride the conservatard train off the tracks on this issue?
Is it wishful thinking?
Are you an agent of the great lie?

Is it that simply being a GOP stooge (member) you are obligated to stand up and lie about anything the party perceives to be a threat to the Cock Bros income stream? Or are you just a disingenuous asshole?
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... so you have an explanation for CO2 continuing to increase, yet temps have stabilized for 17+ years? The models are wrong. This is the backbone of their AGW theory. The data is most certainly on my side. The consensus shouters are the ones who deny science. Real scientists do not shout 'consensus!!!' and refuse to listen to data that shows their models are wrong.

Fear mongers like you are doing more harm to the environment than good.
Click to expand...

Temps haven't stabilized you flipping moron. That is just your bald faced lie of a misinterpretation. The chart clearly show a slow steady, inexorable increase.
 
Celticguy said:
Read the law and you will understand whats really happening in the bed that is not happening in the free atmosphere. But the blanket does nothing about heat escaping my body.
Click to expand...

Read the law and you will understand that it applies to closed systems. If you consider the earth in the universe a closed system, :dunno:
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... no moron... I posted the chart from their site that says precisely what I have stated. That the earth's warming period has stagnated at the levels we saw in the late 90's. That we have seen no significant warming since that point in time. This, despite the fact you fear mongers claim that it is MAN'S CO2 output that is the MAIN driver in climate change.

So I ask you again... HOW can MAN be the primary factor in climate change if the very thing you fear mongers SAY is driving it... ISN'T

If nature is offsetting man's effect... then NATURE is the primary driver, not man.
Click to expand...

I think this quote from Joanne Nova sums it up very eloquently.

Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and that adding more to it will warm the planet, yes, absolutely, that's all well proven solid science known for years, yes. I have no disagreement with any of that. Disagreement is with how much warming there is. Is it going to be a catastrophe or is it going to be 0.5 degrees and as far as we can see the evidence the empirical evidence, and there's lots of it, all seems to point to it being around about half a degree to maybe one degree with CO2 doubling which is not the catastrophic projections that are coming out from the climate models.
Click to expand...

http://www.abc.net.au/tv/changeyourmind/webextras/jonova_davidevans_transcript.pdf
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Right, because life begins at conception oooorrrr twelve hours later and that's a fact of basic biology with which biologists basically disagree.

You are all wet.
Click to expand...

you really are an idiot... life does begin at conception you moron. It doesn't magically wait 12 hours. You cannot even comprehend what she stated. the new human genome is COMPLETED WITHIN 12 hours. That means it takes roughly 12 hours for the formation to occur. It BEGINS when the sperm and egg cell merge.

But, as I stated, you are too ignorant of basic biology to comprehend that. You think you have some sort of 'gotcha'.

idiot.
 
Superfreak said:
you really are an idiot... life does begin at conception you moron. It doesn't magically wait 12 hours. You cannot even comprehend what she stated. the new human genome is COMPLETED WITHIN 12 hours. That means it takes roughly 12 hours for the formation to occur. It BEGINS when the sperm and egg cell merge.

But, as I stated, you are too ignorant of basic biology to comprehend that. You think you have some sort of 'gotcha'.

idiot.
Click to expand...

Depends on definitions and viability, as has been demonstrated several times. Did you ever read the supreme court decision on the matter, where they cite evidence and testimony that even scientists and philosophers disagree?
 
Superfreak said:
Yet the DATA is on my side. Not yours.

The Science is on my side... not yours.

You are the one that denies science... not me.

You are a cowardly little liar... that is proven fact.
Click to expand...



when have you ever been proven out correct on the prediction of the results on any policy?


you guys don't get listened to because you always turn out to be wrong.

then you have the scumosity to refuse to admitt when your wrong
 
1966stang said:
Depends on definitions and viability, as has been demonstrated several times. Did you ever read the supreme court decision on the matter, where they cite evidence and testimony that even scientists and philosophers disagree?
Click to expand...

lmao... no... viability has no part in determining whether something is human or not.

LMAO... what does philosophy have to do with genetics? oh yeah... NOTHING
 
Your saying that because it is alive and has human DNA, that it is a viable life. My fingernail clipping is alive, and has human DNA cells. should I not clip my finger nails?
 
callinectes said:
I don't care if it's man made or not. If it is, it's because we have too many men hanging around. We have added over 2 million people to the population of the U.S. alone since the 2010 census. So unless you want a real humdinger of a war, or you want to let some drug resistant super bug have it's way with you, shut up and embrace the suck.
Click to expand...

False dichotomy. Your saying we have only two choices, increasing global warming or a forced draconian reduction in population. We have more than two choices.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top