This just in... Private Sector workers doing FINE!

You stated that the GOP didn't have any plans, so I linked you to their plans. I wasn't parroting each of the proposals and saying they were the be all end all. I simply showed you that they are indeed proposing plans, which is contrary to the complete BULLSHIT you are parroting from your masters.

Where is the Republican jobs bill?
 
That's a list of bills. Where is the Republican jobs bill?

So because they break it out and don't try to cram a 2000 page bill full of crap down the throats of the public, that is bad?

You do understand that your master has now decided to break his farcical 'jobs bill' up into separate pieces?
 
So because they break it out and don't try to cram a 2000 page bill full of crap down the throats of the public, that is bad?

They haven't broken anything out. They have no plan so they put out a list of previously introduced bills to pretend they actually have a plan.


You do understand that your master has now decided to break his farcical 'jobs bill' up into separate pieces?

You do understand that you're a massive tool don't you?
 
no it isn't. job creation is a fortunate by product of needed construction venues. throwing away money to hire temp teachers and police officers is an unconstitutional waste of taxpayer money that could be used to pay down the debt.

I wasn't talking about this specific piece of legislation.
 
no it isn't. job creation is a fortunate by product of needed construction venues. throwing away money to hire temp teachers and police officers is an unconstitutional waste of taxpayer money that could be used to pay down the debt.

Walker's repeal of union retirement bargaining saved teacher jobs- That is the way to secure public jobs.
 
at a loss of 3 to 1. what good can that possibly do?

I'd love to have a conversation with you about this, but you can't keep going up and down the ladder of specificity to suit your argument. Government consumption creates jobs. Lots of them. Whether a specific policy proposal creates jobs efficiently is an entirely separate discussion.
 
I'd love to have a conversation with you about this, but you can't keep going up and down the ladder of specificity to suit your argument. Government consumption creates jobs. Lots of them. Whether a specific policy proposal creates jobs efficiently is an entirely separate discussion.

LMAO.... so all of this government deficit spending and yet unemployment remains above 9%... but somehow that spending creates 'lots of jobs'. You truly are a tool.
 
I'd love to have a conversation with you about this, but you can't keep going up and down the ladder of specificity to suit your argument. Government consumption creates jobs. Lots of them. Whether a specific policy proposal creates jobs efficiently is an entirely separate discussion.

1. government consumption requires bodies to fulfill whatever purpose is desired at that time.

2. because government only consumes and doesn't produce, any job created is only temporary.

3. temporary jobs will only put an economy on a rollercoaster which creates uncertainty in the market.

4. uncertainty in the market extends negative outlooks in the economy which only serves to continue the downslide.

the end result being that governments attempt to create jobs only fuels economic instability.
 
This again? God damn you're one thick-headed feller, ain't ya?

Is the unemployment rate above 9% still? Yes.

A point you seem desperate to avoid. I know your masters want you to continue to try and deflect from this... but bottom line, all that government spending did little. It was a stop gap measure. Which is why Stimulus 2.0 is now on the table to once again 'please help our public sector workers again... you know, the same ones we bailed out before, but now have to bail out again'
 
Back
Top