This is what a world leader does

Rice is Tweeting that Trump should not tweet in support. What a buffoon. :rolleyes:

Tweeting is not interventionism ( though she has no problem with that) it's a show of much needed support

Rice is an idiot.

Tweeting is ‘soft interventionism’ on Trump’s part—he’s using his position as an American president to play international instigator. It’s in our interest that the mullahs are overthrown: it would get Iran out of Yemen and Syria. It would get Iran out of Gaza and defund Hezbollah.

I can’t think of a single reason why we shouldn’t be 100% behind the protesters.
 
Rice is an idiot.

Tweeting is ‘soft interventionism’ on Trump’s part—he’s using his position as an American president to play international instigator. It’s in our interest that the mullahs are overthrown: it would get Iran out of Yemen and Syria. It would get Iran out of Gaza and defund Hezbollah.

I can’t think of a single reason why we shouldn’t be 100% behind the protesters.
indeed.
it's a very long shot,but we should support the protestors
 
Who knows how it will turn out but it is a good thing and it’s been AWOL for 8 years.

Trump said this at the UN some months ago—and he was probably castigated in some quarters for it:

By my count, in the speech’s several paragraphs devoted to Iran, at least 11 of 17 sentences served to highlight specific ways that the regime has failed the Iranian people. Thus, the regime “masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of democracy.” It “has turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state” whose “longest-suffering victims … are, in fact, its own people.” Rather than using Iran’s vast oil profits to “improve Iranian lives,” the regime wastes this wealth — “which rightly belongs to the Iranian people” — on foreign adventures, from “fund[ing] Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill innocent Muslims” to “shor[ing] up Bashar al-Assad’s criminal dictatorship, fuel[ing] Yemen’s civil war, and undermin[ing] peace throughout the Middle East.”

The entire world knows, Trump concluded, that “the good people of Iran want change” and that “Iran’s people are what their leaders fear the most.” That is why the mullahs “restrict internet access, tear down satellite dishes, shoot unarmed student protesters, and imprison political reformers.” Trump finished with the provocative prediction that “oppressive regimes cannot endure forever” and that the day will come when Iran’s people face a choice: “To continue down the path of poverty, bloodshed and terror” or “return to the nation’s proud roots as a center of civilization, culture and wealth where their people can be happy and prosperous once again?”

It was relentless and quite remarkable. Unprecedented even. I can’t recall any previous U.S. president using their speech to the General Assembly to address the longstanding grievances of the Iranian people in such a sustained and comprehensive manner. It definitely never happened during the eight years of Barrack Obama’s presidency. Quite the opposite. Not even in his first U.N. address in September 2009, with the Green Revolution at its height and young Iranian protesters chanting, “Obama, you are either with us or with them [the regime],” did the 44th president deign to deliver a single word of solace to those being mowed down in the streets of Tehran.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/22...the-most-important-part-of-trumps-u-n-speech/
________________

I don’t recall Trump saying this, but one has wonder whether the Iranian people heard it and remember it well.

This is the #1 story on the planet right now and all some people can do is talk about Trump? What we're witnessing over there right now is what a REAL legitimate protest looks like and for all the right reasons. Allllllllll that blood money that Obama gave to Iran???!!!! I just shake my head. :palm:
 
A decidedly slim, majority.

The popular vote was within one or two percentage points of being 50/50. Not that that would stop you goof balls from claiming an ‘overwhelming’ victory in the popular vote.
Meme Suppressed by the Muddled Media

The four candidates on the Right got more popular votes than hillary and Jillary. That counts as much as the Demwits' PV fetish. The fact that the Right doesn't bring this up indicates that they want all Righties in one party.
 
This is the #1 story on the planet right now and all some people can do is talk about Trump? What we're witnessing over there right now is what a REAL legitimate protest looks like and for all the right reasons. Allllllllll that blood money that Obama gave to Iran???!!!! I just shake my head. :palm:

The Obama blood money is the subtext to this.

The Iranian people knew about the sweet deal Obama gave to the mullahs and they know the money hasn’t gone for government services but for military adventures in Yemen and for financing terror in general. Meanwhile, the Iranians are suffering.

Rightfully pissed, they are taking to the streets.

Trump, in his usual fashion, is right on top of it with Twitter. Vlad is pissed that some people are engaging in ‘external interference’ in Iran. Same ditto with Erdogan and Susan Rice lol.
 
You are trying to make a judgment based on a race that wasn't run, Republicans neither bother campaigning or voting in California, Illinois, or New York. Trump ran the campaign based on the rules of said campaign you laughable faggot.

The Media Are Voices From a Box, Just Like What Insane People Hear

In fact, the RNC blamed Romney for campaigning too widely. Everything fits together if you ignore what the hired media focus on. Left or Right, they got their jobs through brownnosing, not brains. Couch potatoes get their brains peeled.
 
Last edited:
Rice is an idiot.

Tweeting is ‘soft interventionism’ on Trump’s part—he’s using his position as an American president to play international instigator. It’s in our interest that the mullahs are overthrown: it would get Iran out of Yemen and Syria. It would get Iran out of Gaza and defund Hezbollah.

I can’t think of a single reason why we shouldn’t be 100% behind the protesters.

The Yellow Yell, and Hollow Fools Follow

The protesters are cowards. They won't overthrow the government unless they're willing to risk their lives to kill those loyal to the regime. There can be no land of the free that is not a home of the brave. Protesting is a fad of the decadent West; our own protesters' behavior sets a bad example for true freedom-fighters. They never succeed unless our regime supports them, or if they are spoiled sons of the regime.

Cynicism was my reaction when the Arab Spring began. Though I didn't anticipate that they would become ISIS or Saudi mercenaries, I saw their behavior as immature and ineffective.
 
The Yellow Yell, and Hollow Fools Follow

The protesters are cowards. They won't overthrow the government unless they're willing to risk their lives to kill those loyal to the regime. There can be no land of the free that is not a home of the brave. Protesting is a fad of the decadent West; our own protesters' behavior sets a bad example for true freedom-fighters. They never succeed unless our regime supports them, or if they are spoiled sons of the regime.

Cynicism was my reaction when the Arab Spring began. Though I didn't anticipate that they would become ISIS or Saudi mercenaries, I saw their behavior as immature and ineffective.

The difference between our own protestors and the Iranian variety is the latter risks their lives at it.

They deserve to be taken seriously. Ours, not so much.
 
Here is Trump ‘not ignoring them’ on Twitter minutes ago:

The people of Iran are finally acting against the brutal and corrupt Iranian regime. All of the money that President Obama so foolishly gave them went into terrorism and into their “pockets.” The people have little food, big inflation and no human rights. The U.S. is watching!

Very Reaganesk. About time we have a real leader.
 
The difference between our own protestors and the Iranian variety is the latter risks their lives at it.

They deserve to be taken seriously. Ours, not so much.

Flying Carpets

If they don't kill, they're not serious. Few of them believe they will be killed, but taking up arms is not for the faint-hearted. Besides, many leaders of these movements are just out for their own power and are excluded by this particular regime. Untold history would reveal that many are impatient heirs of the regime with Daddy issues, but they still hold a contempt for the majority that their Daddies gave them.
 
Back
Top