Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Shou

T. A. Gardner said:
Not even annotated with a source...

But it's obvious you got this from the self-biased site Mediafactcheckbias. This is just another site foisting its biased opinion on the internet. You can see that in their write up about the Federalist.



You can read it in that sentence. The Federalist uses credible mainstream outlets--- BUT!

See how they rate some sites they mostly agree with that are left of center...
Click to expand...

Due to your far right extremism, you're not really qualified to judge what is biased.
 
ExpressLane said:
[video=youtube;iE42h6Qtys4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE42h6Qtys4[/vide]
Click to expand...

6jkhpn.jpg
 
Trump to loyalists: "Trash the FBI!"

Loyalists: "On it!"

I can't believe I'm getting nostalgic about the days when Republicans were all about the rule of law....
 
ExpressLane said:
It should be easy then for you to try to refute the context of the article. Your feeble attempt to deflect from the article is duly noted.
Click to expand...

Hey, ExcessLies. Whatever happened to 2000 Mules? Nobody's talking about it anymore. I thought it was your Smoking Gun.
I guess it didn't stick. What are you going too throw against the wall next, ExcessLies? Hunter's laptop?
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
 
Joe Capitalist said:
Due to your far right extremism, you're not really qualified to judge what is biased.
Click to expand...

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American fact-checking website founded in 2015 by editor Dave M. Van Zandt.[1] It uses a 0-10 scale to rate sites on two areas: bias and factual accuracy. It has been criticised for its methodology and accuracy.[2]

Chart showing the degree of bias rating given to CNN
Van Zandt and his team use a 0–10 scale to rate sites for biased wording, headlines, actuality, sourcing, story choices, and political affiliation. There is a criteria for factual accuracy based on failed fact checks.[3] The group has also sorted hundreds of web pages into the ideological categories of: Left, Left Center, Least Biased, Right Center, and Right.[4] Van Zandt admits he is not an expert and that "his methods are not rigorously objective."[5]

According to Daniel Funke and Alexios Mantzarlis of the Poynter Institute, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[2] In 2018, the Columbia Journalism Review identified Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis."[9] Additionally, the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check
 
Every institution that goes after Trump, is now suddenly a flawed establishment. Can't wait for McDonald's to call his fat white ass out......LOLOLO
 
ExpressLane said:
Well she had classified documents on an non government server. One that could easily be hacked by a bad actor state like China, Russia , North Korea, or Iran. All of which have very active and capable government hackers. Trump's file were under lock and key in a mansion protected by the Secret Service. And Hillary destroyed subpoenaed Emails and devices. And the FBI chose not to indict her nor to raid her home and to give several of her co conspirators immunity. So I guess we can expect similar treatment for Trump. But I doubt that is how it will work.
Click to expand...

Hillary had classified information on the server. She did not have a single document marked classified on her server. Some of the emails were later marked classified but they were not designated as such when they were on her server. A classified document requires a header clearly stating it is classified. That is what was found at Mar-a-Lago.
The files were not under lock and key at Mar-a-Lago. The FBI sent Trump's lawyers a notice that the documents were not under the required protection which is when they put a lock on the door. The documents were supposedly in a storage area next to the pool.

The FBI could have raided Hillary's home and they would have found nothing there because by the time anyone was aware she might have classified information on the server the server had been shut down and had not been physically located in her home for several years. Hillary did not destroy any subpoenaed emails or devices. Destroying something before it is subpoenaed is not a crime. It seems you don't understand how time works or subpoenas work or classification works. Care to show us how ignorant you are on any other topics?
 
ExpressLane said:
So President Clinton committed perjury under oath to the Special Council. Remind me did he get jail time?
Click to expand...

LOL.. Remind us when Clinton went to trial for perjury. Or just remind us when he was indicted for perjury. Then perhaps you can tell us how someone that is not indicted can get jail time.
 
ExpressLane said:
Wrong!!! . He lied under oath to a Grand Jury. That is obstruction of justice and perjury. And he obstructed justice by telling Monica to lie.

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/multimedia/timeline/9809/starr.report/grounds/g1.htm
Click to expand...

Funny thing about that.. Trump likely committed obstruction of justice. I don't recall you demanding he do jail time.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.
Click to expand...
 
ExpressLane said:
Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again

In the summer of 2016, FBI bureaucrats launched a deep-state operation, known as Crossfire Hurricane, to thwart then-candidate Trump’s presidential ambitions. It began by targeting Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos and quickly branched out as bureaucrats expanded their surveillance. The spy agency used the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) as a legal pretext to investigate and spy on Papadopoulos, in addition to former White House national security adviser Michael Flynn, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, and former Trump adviser Carter Page. Several were interviewed by undercover FBI informant Stefan Halper, whose own investigation would prove a bust.
According to a declassified transcript between Papadopoulos and a Crossfire Hurricane confidential human source (CHS), Papadopoulos repeatedly denied the Trump campaign was working with Russian-backed entities to capture the 2016 election. The FBI, however, wrote off Papadopoulos’s recorded answers as rehearsed and omitted his denials of campaign collusion with overseas actors in FISA court warrant applications and renewals. These were two of the 17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” identified in the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general’s blockbuster report on the investigation in December 2019.

Papadopoulos, who pled guilty to making a false statement to the FBI in a perjury trap, was far from the only individual to face political persecution from the federal government’s dystopian investigation.

Not one of the four FISA warrants obtained by the FBI was legally justified, according to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report. In fact, at least two of the warrant applications to spy on Page were declared illegal by a federal judge. Following Horowitz’s blistering report outlining FBI misconduct throughout the entire operation, another federal judge declared that agency malfeasance “calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable.”

...................

https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/1...st-of-corruption-should-make-you-think-again/

====================================

And the list of dubious FBI behavior goes on and on and on.

The FBI has EARNED our mistrust by their prior bad acts.

Discuss.
Click to expand...

The Federalist, or the Gateway Pundit:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top