Things were horrible when Obama took office

[Cancel 2020.1]

Nobody here thinks CBO is non partisan right ?

The CBO is a non-partisan group.

Regardless, they do have actual reports and statistics if you want to take the time to do some actual research on the topic. All I ever hear from the right is shoot-from-the-hip evaluations, with no basis in fact or research.

 

[Leonthecat]

Nobody here thinks CBO is non partisan right ?

Only rightwing hacks think they aren't.

 

[cawacko]

I would like to see greater growth, and it looks like we are slowly starting to get it. I would rather see 2-4% long and sustained than 7-12% that crashes in a year or so.

You simply have to admit that the predictions that things were only going to get worse due to Obama's election were incorrect.

When have we had anything close to 7%-12% economic growth?

 

[CFM]

Are you genuflecting in front of your Obama statue?

He's already gone around the back and tried to stick his head up the statute's ass. Sad part is he couldn't figure out why it wouldn't go like with the real one.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Man, do I wish we had more clever righties on the board.

 

[cawacko]

I quadrupled my net worth over that time
I'm guessing you didn't

You're nothing if not consistent Toppy. I respect that about you. Doesn't matter what the topic is you're rich and everyone else is poor. You're educated and they aren't.

 

[Celticguy]

The CBO is a non-partisan group.

Regardless, they do have actual reports and statistics if you want to take the time to do some actual research on the topic. All I ever hear from the right is shoot-from-the-hip evaluations, with no basis in fact or research.

I followed it at the time and there were no end of questions regarding the methodology. I brought up the union teachers as they were included but as time showed, those jobs were not saved.
CBO claims impartiality but they know which side their bread us buttered on. And they flip as majorities flip.

 

[Legion Troll]

CBO claims impartiality but they know which side their bread us buttered on. And they flip as majorities flip.

Prove it.

I'll understand if you can't.


Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

 

[The Dude]

You're nothing if not consistent Toppy. I respect that about you. Doesn't matter what the topic is you're rich and everyone else is poor. You're educated and they aren't.

I never said I was rich!
What I'm swing is the obuma sucks crowd would be much less angry if they had gained about 800,000 while he was in charge

 

[CFM]

I never said I was rich!
What I'm swing is the obuma sucks crowd would be much less angry if they had gained about 800,000 while he was in charge

That's a lie.

 

[The Dude]

That's a lie.

Where is your proof cuck

 

[Legion Troll]

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

 

[ChoppedLiver]

Where is your proof cuck

LOL!

What's a "proof cuck"?

LMAO!!!

 

[Legion Troll]

If you are one of the nearly 50% of Americans with money in the stock market, does it make a difference which party is in the White House?

History says yes.

Democrats have been better for the stock market

Since 1945, the average annual gain under a Democrat president is 9.7%. Under a Republican president, it's only been 6.7%.

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.




http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/28/investing/stock-market-democrats-republicans/

 

[The Dude]

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

That is how you know consevatards are not into stocks!

 

[The Dude]

If you are one of the nearly 50% of Americans with money in the stock market, does it make a difference which party is in the White House?

History says yes.

Democrats have been better for the stock market

Since 1945, the average annual gain under a Democrat president is 9.7%. Under a Republican president, it's only been 6.7%.

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.




http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/28/investing/stock-market-democrats-republicans/

This is a main reason I switched parties

 

[Legion Troll]

This is a main reason I switched parties

Looks like Obama is better on employment than the conservative saint, too:

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

 

[Leonthecat]

Looks like Obama is better on employment than the conservative saint, too:

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

Boom!

 

[The Dude]

Conservatards don't do economics
The cry about welfare

 

[canceled.2021.1]

How is it NOT a valid measurement?

The CBO is not some partisan, pro-Obama group. Educate yourself. You just sound ignorant.

The CBO only scored what it is given. It makes no objective analysis.

But please educate me. How does one objectively measure "jobs saved"?

How many jobs were "saved" under Bush? Clinton?

And don't just answer "look up the CBO"