Thief and Moron Trump Says He May Ask Exxon To Help Steal Syria’s Oil

Micawber said:
It was Cheney or Wolfowitz or Rummy who said much the same in advance of the Iraq war. He(they?) stated the oil we got would repay us
for the treasure expended in the enterprise. Sort of brazen. They never followed through, we did not get the oil and we handed out buttloads of cash
to try and win support of tribal leaders.

Here there was no monetary justification as cordoning it off and being security guards could be paid for with one gusher in a week.
Seems Trump is going full tilt King Leopold III with this shit.
Click to expand...

and while in their possession they refused to repair the oil gauges on the rigs in Iraq


making it impossible to tell how much oil was being pumped and produced

request after request after request for fixing them was ignored for years
 
Cinnabar said:
And this numbnut Trump sycophant Gookmonster believes Trump is protecting the oil for the Kurds. Someone explain that insane interpretation.
Click to expand...

I can't. It belongs to Syria or the Kurds, but certainly not the USA. Wars of economic conquest no longer Bueno. Many would argue that they all are
as the victors tend to be in a uniquely strong bargaining position for post bellum deal making.

Things are acquired through historic claim or through arms length deal making between just claimants. This doesn't fall into those categories.
 
Micawber said:
I can't. It belongs to Syria or the Kurds, but certainly not the USA. Wars of economic conquest no longer Bueno. Many would argue that they all are
as the victors tend to be in a uniquely strong bargaining position for post bellum deal making.

Things are acquired through historic claim or through arms length deal making between just claimants. This doesn't fall into those categories.
Click to expand...

Yawn. The fake lawyer trying be intelligent. And failing as usual.
 
Micawber said:
I don't see what is different about this really. If it weren't for oil, we wouldn't fucking be anywhere near the middle east.
It's of high strategic value only because of oil. The demand for dates and cashews doesn't spawn wars lately.
Click to expand...

yep the line has always been.....our 'national security interests' are at stake - - so therefore we control all the world's oil regardless of who owns it
 
The amount of oil in Syria is not that great, but it doesn't belong to anyone else. Syria needs every bit of it for its' use.

What the U.S. is doing is controlling the highways.

Jack is probably right about American oil companies wanting nothing to do with the issue.
 
Micawber said:
I don't see what is different about this really. If it weren't for oil, we wouldn't fucking be anywhere near the middle east.
It's of high strategic value only because of oil. The demand for dates and cashews doesn't spawn wars lately.
Click to expand...

Or Matryoshka dolls from Russia the place that has shit if not it being a petrol state.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top