They need to make up their mind

Buckly J. Ewer said:
If a wiretap was approved by a FISA court then they had to have strong evidence that Trump's campaign was in collusion with the Russians to subvert the election.
If there wasn't a wire tap Trump is insane ... if there was, he is very likely guilty of collusion...
Take your fucking pick... Which do you prefer?
Click to expand...

let's release it all then bitch, but your side is afraid.

BTW the FISA court denied it in June

PWND again bitch

Do you enjoy being my bitch?
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
If a wiretap was approved by a FISA court then they had to have strong evidence that Trump's campaign was in collusion with the Russians to subvert the election.
If there wasn't a wire tap Trump is insane ... if there was, he is very likely guilty of collusion...
Take your fucking pick... Which do you prefer?
Click to expand...

Try again.
If there was a wiretap on a presidential candidate, Obama is toast.
If there wasn't, how'd the Dems get the literal phone calls between Trump and the Australian leader and others. And, where did they get all the bogus Russian "info"? Again, Obama is toast.
 
Teflon Don said:
let's release it all then bitch, but your side is afraid.

BTW the FISA court denied it in June

PWND again bitch

Do you enjoy being my bitch?
Click to expand...

Okay shitstain, if FISA denied a wiretap on the orange clown, then your boy is delusionally paranoid...(insane)...
I agree with you...
LMFAO
 
The tap was approved in October.


The Judges Who Approved The Trump Wiretap By Obama

By Earnest Jones , The Goldwater · 03-06-2017

The treasonous Obama could not have been in a position to get the wiretap on Trump legitimately, he definitely had to collaborate with the appeals court behind the scenes. The recent turn of events have just exposed the corrupted judges who saw the wiretap on Mr. Trump, that consequently led to the cherry picked leaks.

This leads us back to the acting attorney general for Obama who tried to pursue this and was turned down by the FISA Court, which constitutes different appointee’s that were appointed by Bush, Carter, Bill Clinton, Reagan and Obama. Unfortunately, the non-partisan committee turned down the request so that it go to the appeal court which happens to be logged by Clinton appointed judges.

Whenever FISA applications are denied by the FISC, they may be appealed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. The Court of Review constitutes of a three-judge panel and since it was created, it has come into session two times: in 2002 and 2008.

It’s every Americans concern to know who are these three judges who had the guts to approve the FISA warrant on President Trump.

The first presiding Judge was William C. Bryson who was born in Houston Texas back in 1945. The Federal Judicial Service indicates that he was nominated by William J. Clinton on June 22, 1994, to a seat that was vacated by Howard Thomas Markey. He was confirmed by the Senate on the 28th of September 1994 and received commission on the 29th of the same month 1994. He later assumed senior status on the 7th of January 2013.

The second judge goes by the name Jose A. Cabranes who was born in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico back in 1940. He was nominated by Jimmy Carter back in November 6, 1979, to a seat vacated by Jon O. Newman. He was confirmed by the Senate on December 5th 1969 and received commission on December 10, 1979.

The third judge is Tallman, Richard C who was born in Oakland California back in 1953. He was nominated by William J. Clinton on October 20, 1999, to a seat vacated by Betty Binns Fletcher. Confirmed by the Senate on May 24, 2000, and received commission on May 25, 2000.
 
Stretch said:
Try again.
If there was a wiretap on a presidential candidate, Obama is toast.
If there wasn't, how'd the Dems get the literal phone calls between Trump and the Australian leader and others. And, where did they get all the bogus Russian "info"? Again, Obama is toast.
Click to expand...

This is some quality spin.

Trump is out there at this point: either Obama was directly involved in wiretapping Trump tower, or Trump has a TON of 'splaining to do.

The. End.
 
Thing1 said:
This is some quality spin.

Trump is out there at this point: either Obama was directly involved in wiretapping Trump tower, or Trump has a TON of 'splaining to do.

The. End.
Click to expand...


So where do you think the so called transcripts came from that everyone said existed on Mike Flynn? What about the conversation between Trump and the Australian PM? We have heard for months that there are these "transcripts" proving collusion between Trump and the Russians. Well where do you think they came from?

Also, what do you think of the news today that the CIA has ways of hacking and making it look like the Russians? Do you believe it or is it a fairytale?
 
Teflon Don said:
So where do you think the so called transcripts came from that everyone said existed on Mike Flynn? What about the conversation between Trump and the Australian PM? We have heard for months that there are these "transcripts" proving collusion between Trump and the Russians. Well where do you think they came from?

Also, what do you think of the news today that the CIA has ways of hacking and making it look like the Russians? Do you believe it or is it a fairytale?
Click to expand...

I guess we'll see, eh? But we do know that the DOJ and CIA have independent investigations.

It's a long way from there to Obama being a "sick man" for ordering wiretaps on Trump Tower. And you KNOW that Trump only got that from Breitbart & Mark Levin.

It's what Trump does. It's not like this is an anomaly.
 
Teflon Don said:
So where do you think the so called transcripts came from that everyone said existed on Mike Flynn? What about the conversation between Trump and the Australian PM? We have heard for months that there are these "transcripts" proving collusion between Trump and the Russians. Well where do you think they came from?

Also, what do you think of the news today that the CIA has ways of hacking and making it look like the Russians? Do you believe it or is it a fairytale?
Click to expand...

The CIA, you mean Obama's personal spying agency, backed up by the FBI and the NSA?
 
Stretch said:
From the Wikileaks "Year Zero" dump:

The CIA's Remote Devices Branch's UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques 'stolen' from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the "fingerprints" of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.

UMBRAGE components cover keyloggers, password collection, webcam capture, data destruction, persistence, privilege escalation, stealth, anti-virus (PSP) avoidance and survey techniques.

Everyone knew it. Now we have proof.

"Fingerprints" are meaningless.

It's now clear that the CIA is able to "pose" as "Russian hackers" whenever it so chooses.

Just something to think about.

All allegations of "digital fingerprints" left behind by Russian hackers must now be dismissed as either fake or meaningless.

http://www.drudgereport.com/
Click to expand...
Drudge...LMAO
 
Thing1 said:
I guess we'll see, eh? But we do know that the DOJ and CIA have independent investigations.

It's a long way from there to Obama being a "sick man" for ordering wiretaps on Trump Tower. And you KNOW that Trump only got that from Breitbart & Mark Levin.

It's what Trump does. It's not like this is an anomaly.
Click to expand...

who in the Obama administration then, do you believe did it without his knowledge.......the FISA act, as I understand it, required the approval of the Attorney General....that would have been Lynch, correct?...
 
Thing1 said:
Let's see the evidence.

The onus is on Trump. My bet is that he saw Levin & just went off half-cocked on twitter, like he usually does. If he has no evidence, he's in deep on this one.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence, they don't need evidence... remember they are birthers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top