"There will be a long-term mission in Libya,” US General

anatta

100% recycled karma
— The U.S. military’s top general said Thursday that the Libyan government is in a “period of intense dialogue” that could soon lead to an agreement in which U.S. military advisers will be deployed there to assist in the fight against the Islamic State.

“There’s a lot of activity going on underneath the surface,” said Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “We’re just not ready to deploy capabilities yet because there hasn’t been an agreement. And frankly, any day that could happen.”

Dunford spoke to a handful of journalists while returning to the United States from Brussels, where he met with military chiefs this week from numerous NATO nations. There is interest among some NATO nations in participating in the mission, Dunford said, but the specifics of who and what would be involved remain unclear. The operation will likely focus on training and equipping militias that pledge loyalty to Prime Minister Fayez Sarraj, the leader of the new Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA), which is backed by the United Nations.

[Who in Libya will the U.S. send weapons to? It’s complicated, says a top general.]

“There will be a long-term mission in Libya,” Dunford predicted, adding that NATO will want a request from the new government in order to get involved.

A small number of U.S. Special Operations troops have been deployed to the Libyan cities of Misrata and Benghazi to assess who could be partners for U.S. forces since late last year, U.S. officials acknowledge. Dunford declined to comment on their operations Thursday, but said the United States is looking for ways to make “a unique contribution” to the effort.

The advising mission could be complicated by not only security concerns, but political ones. Sarraj’s government has not yet been accepted by either existing rival government in Libya, the Tripoli-based General National Congress (GNC) and the elected House of Representatives in the eastern part of the country. He also appears to be counting on support from militias in Misrata and forces loyal to Gen. Khalifa Hifter, a Libyan military officer who launched a campaign against the GNC and its Islamist links in 2014. The Misratans and Hifter’s troops have been known to square off against each other in armed clashes.

The coalition leadership structure for the Libyan mission also isn’t clear. Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said early this month that he anticipated the Italian government would take the lead in it. However, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi has ruled out a large “invasion” of Libya, and reports emerged this week that Renzi was backing out of deploying troops in support of the U.N.’s support mission in Libya.

Asked about the possibility of Italy stepping back from the Libya mission, Dunford said Thursday that he spoke to their chief of defense, Gen. Claudio Graziano, this week and did not anticipate that would be the case. Rather, the Italian government is still doing planning for the mission but has set conditions for getting involved, Dunford said. They include the unity government requesting Italian intervention and identifying who should be trained, and there being demonstrated international support, possibly through a U.N. Security Council mandate.


“The details of that aren’t specific,” Dunford said. “But I think with those broad details in place, the Italians have indicated to me that they are committed to the mission.”

The U.S. dialogue with the unity government has been spearheaded by U.S. Ambassador to Libya Peter W. Bodde and Jonathan Winer, the State Department’s special envoy for Libya. Winer tweeted Thursday to expect the unity government to ask for help to train and equip soldiers to fight Daesh, another name for the Islamic State, and to receive it.

On Monday, the United States and international partners announced in Vienna that they are prepared to provide humanitarian, economic and security assistance if requested, including weapons, and to support a request by the Libyan unity government for an exception to a U.N. embargo that was put in place in 2011 as the country faced an internal war after the fall of strongman Moammar Gaddafi.

Army Gen. David Rodriguez, the chief of U.S. Africa Command, said Tuesday that officials are now waiting to see how the U.N. examines the Libyan request, which must include details about who will receive weapons.

The support for the GNA and how they need it and how they want it, we’ll just have to see how that develops over time,” Rodriguez said, speaking of the Libyan government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ain_checkpoint-libya-820pm-top:homepage/story
 
Libya is a failed state. The unity government is UN imposed -
but gaining some popular support because of the years of militia rule and civil war. ( misery)

The Misrata Brigrades ( militia) are going after ISIS in Sirte, but they are not a professional army.
In that sense they do need trainers, but advisors turn into trainers, and trainers turn into combat troops like we are seeing US forces in Syria.

Also letting weapons in past the UN embargo.....we saw what happened in Syria when the CIA tried to arm up the "rebels"

It's a clusterfuck of US/NATO's making though..and according to the Powell Doctrine "you break it you own it"..
so what they are doing now is trying to create a new central gov't (unity),and hopefully the gov'ts in Tobruk and Tripoli will pledge.

It's a mess.
 
The Russians have made it abundantly clear that Turkey is assisting ISIS materially, demonstrably clear. Why doesn't anybody listen to them ?
 
The Russians have made it abundantly clear that Turkey is assisting ISIS materially, demonstrably clear. Why doesn't anybody listen to them ?
in Syria (and it used to be much worse) where Erdogan plays off ISIS against Assad.

But Turkey has no influence in Libya. Sirte is vacationland for ISIS leadership, and the most successful affiliate outside Syria/Iraq.

we created a monster.
 
Back
Top