‘There is NO GOD’ Stephen Hawking’s final revelation of the afterlife REVEALED

“Is god willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ― Epicurus (341-270BC)
 
Who giggled? It does not please us that he is in Hell. We simply stand for what we believe in, just like you do! I have proof of God, he changed my life.

Hell is what feebleminded people use to torture their children into believing in God. You have no such proof, only opinions and feelings.
 
"Hell is what feebleminded people use to torture their children into believing ..." RL #162

As Pascal's Wager demonstrates, it's not an argument for BELIEF. It's an argument for hypocrisy. And thus it is an absurdity as a notion of swindling an omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient deity.
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), U.S. president. Letter, 10 Aug. 1787
 
You believe in the god and the religion your parents taught you. It is rare for someone to be religious without training from childhood. All religions get children young and train the shit out of them, because it works so well. What kid has a knowledge base to fend off religious dogma. You trust your parents and the community since they are respponsible for your life. It should be against the law. You should make your own decision as an adult.
 
Pipe down loudmouth.

Fuck you, Jerk-off.

There's nothing blind about science.

Actually, there are lots of things blind about science...which is the reason scientists are always looking for answers.

But I get the gist of what you almost said...and I agree.

So what?

What does that have to do with the question, "Are there any gods involved in the REALITY of existence?"

My answer is, "I do not know...and I cannot make a reasonable guess."

What are you supposing the answer of science is?
 
https://carm.org/manuscript-evidence

The New Testament is constantly under attack, and its reliability and accuracy are often contested by critics. If the critics want to disregard the New Testament, then they must also disregard other ancient writings by Plato, Aristotle, and Homer. This is because the New Testament documents are better-preserved and more numerous than any other ancient writings. Because they are so numerous, they can be cross checked for accuracy . . . and they are very consistent.

I gather you mean that all old religions are true because they are old.

Well, that's a lot of Gods.

We'll have to have a God convention.
 
I thought all this stuff had been dealt with in the middle of the Nineteenth Century, back in Darwin's time. The kind of 'God' described in the Bible, indeed the very notion of such a Force, Person or whatever, seems very hard to reconcile with our current knowledge of the Universe(s). All we can say is that the kind of behaviour recommended by Jesus of Nazareth seems more compatible with the survival of Humanity than capitalism, but you could probably say the same about Gautama Buddha. It doesn't seem sensible to play re-enactment games about Nineteenth Century Theology versus Nineteenth Century Science at this late date though, does it?

This is what happens when a believer in one myth (Socialism) rants about another myth (God/s). It's kitsch.
 
The same can be said for the belief that the ghost of a hundred ton dinosaur call Bess lives in your eyeball. There's no disproving it. Yet you and I both know there is no such thing. Funny that.

Show me the bones of a god and his footprints. we even have eggs of dinos. They are fact, not like gods, all myths and beliefs.
 
It’s called a circular argument. Very popular among thumpers.

Religion is far more popular among Lefties. Most of the religious people in the world are left winged, and that's the great majority. Billions. They overshadow American conservatives a hundred to one.
 
I look at the universe and conclude it could not possibly be the result of random shit happening.....it shouts INTELLIGENT DESIGN everywhere you look.....
Yes we know, you think an eyeball is way too complicated for evolution. Scientists explained how the eye evolved, and how simple that process is, many times, but you never listen.
 
“Is god willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him god?” ― Epicurus (341-270BC)

there you go posting thinkers ideas

if everyone questioned God and treated their fellow humans in the way their beliefs outline


wouldn't that be better than believing without thought and treating their fellow humans badly and not how their doctrine taught them?


I would think an decent god would prefer we question their existance yet follow their teachings
 
Poor Frank, triggered over something he doesn't even believe in. I still can't see why it offends you what others believe.
And if what you claim is true that you don't care, why can't you and other atheists leave well enough alone? Just askin...

Frank isn't an atheist. His God is Obama. The old man has an IQ of about twenty. He gives real atheists a bad name.
 
Of course, as usual, you are flat out wrong larrkin. What party are the evangelicals as an example... I was going to do more, but it is just too wrong to spend time with.
 
Back
Top