There are no equal rights when it comes to having children

[Timshel]

Actually, step families fall into the bucket of "non traditional" families and yes, there are much higher rates if domestic violence in those scenarios.

You know I speak truth. Thousands of years of human experience say it is so. Evolution says it is so. Homosexuals were not meant to be parents, otherwise evolution would have allowed for it. You do believe in evolution don't you?

Point is that there is no indication of it having much to do with the opposite gender of the parents. It is obvious to any objective person that it's mostly about stability.

So then, it is very stupid for social institutions to add to that instability by devaluing/punishing those families. If you want to help those children, do so. But no one is going to confuse your desire to control/punish their parents as actual charity/compassion for the kids.

Evolution is not a conscious force and it most certainly has allowed for homosexuals to be parents.

 

[evince]

It might be better if you kept such info
off these boards, there will always someone like ILA who will use it in a derogatory way.

You called a question information

 

[cancel2 2022]

You called a question information

What question?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Point is that there is no indication of it having much to do with the opposite gender of the parents. It is obvious to any objective person that it's mostly about stability.

So then, it is very stupid for social institutions to add to that instability by devaluing/punishing those families. If you want to help those children, do so. But no one is going to confuse your desire to control/punish their parents as actual charity/compassion for the kids.

Evolution is not a conscious force and it most certainly has allowed for homosexuals to be parents.

Well if it is about stability then that is strike 3 against gays. They are about as unstable as you can get.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Point is that there is no indication of it having much to do with the opposite gender of the parents. It is obvious to any objective person that it's mostly about stability.

So then, it is very stupid for social institutions to add to that instability by devaluing/punishing those families. If you want to help those children, do so. But no one is going to confuse your desire to control/punish their parents as actual charity/compassion for the kids.

Evolution is not a conscious force and it most certainly has allowed for homosexuals to be parents.

Evolution has not allowed for homos to procreate. Therefore they cannot naturally become parents. Thus evolution has naturally selected homos out from being parents. Do not deny evolution. If evolution doesn't see fit to have homes be parents, why should we tinker with it?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Lying about the personal things I posted to smear my family with your incest claims is against the rules.

dicklick

I didn't lie about anything. You are allowing your genetic makeup to cause you to be overly emotional and not think rationally.

I accused nobody in you family of having incest. You said that a couple you called Aunt and Uncle are first cousins. That is an incestuous relationship. What would you call their relationship?

 

[cancel2 2022]

I didn't lie about anything. You are allowing your genetic makeup to cause you to be overly emotional and not think rationally.

I accused nobody in you family of having incest. You said that a couple you called Aunt and Uncle are first cousins. That is an incestuous relationship. What would you call their relationship?

First cousin marriages are legal in the UK and have been since the time of Henry VIII.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

First cousin marriages are legal in the UK and have been since the time of Henry VIII.

That is why they are so fucked up

 

[cancel2 2022]

That is why they are so fucked up

So you think that you are normal?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

So you think that you are normal?

Of course, evolutionarily speaking

 

[Timshel]

Evolution has not allowed for homos to procreate. Therefore they cannot naturally become parents. Thus evolution has naturally selected homos out from being parents. Do not deny evolution. If evolution doesn't see fit to have homes be parents, why should we tinker with it?

Sure, it has. Homosexuals have always been able to have children.

Again, evolution is not a conscious force. I don't deny it, but you are turning it into some sort of mystical nonsense, as if evolutuion is going to become vengeful if "denied" or tinkered with.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Sure, it has. Homosexuals have always been able to have children.

Again, evolution is not a conscious force. I don't deny it, but you are turning it into some sort of mystical nonsense, as if evolutuion is going to become vengeful if "denied" or tinkered with.

Name one instance of one homosexual man getting another homosexual man pregnant.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

My mistake I thought it was against the rules to talk about a posters family that included lies about incest.


So is it OK for someone to call someones daughter a crack whore now?

the lie is never the issue. It's about the content of what is being said.

If I said your parents were acrobats for the russian circus, that's not very ban worthy, is it? Even though its a lieeee.

It's not about the lie, it's about the overall context of the message being conveyed. We do not have a rule against lying.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

How about calling their dad a baby raper?

that is getting dangerously close to our rule about no talk of "Sex with children"

It would be against the rules whether or not it was a lie. Lying doesn't enter into the equation.

 

[Timshel]

Name one instance of one homosexual man getting another homosexual man pregnant.

That was not the argument. You claimed that evolution had not "allowed" for homosexuals to be parents and this was proof they were not fit to be. That is not true. Homosexuals can, do and always have had children. There is no proof that they are unfit for the task and Tom's citation does not even claim that.

You don't seem to be able to break down data points very well.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Sure, it has. Homosexuals have always been able to have children.

Again, evolution is not a conscious force. I don't deny it, but you are turning it into some sort of mystical nonsense, as if evolutuion is going to become vengeful if "denied" or tinkered with.

Forty odd years ago homosexuality was illegal, so I'm not sure what you mean by always?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

That was not the argument. You claimed that evolution had not "allowed" for homosexuals to be parents and this was proof they were not fit to be. That is not true. Homosexuals can, do and always have had children. There is no proof that they are unfit for the task and Tom's citation does not even claim that.

You don't seem to be able to break down data points very well.

Please go back and read Post #65. I was very specific in what I posted and factually I am 100% correct.

Homosexuals can only procreate by engaging in coitus with the opposite sex at which point they aren't really homosexual then are they.

Either you believe in evolution or you don't. Evolution has biologically selected out homosexuality as a mutation because without engaging in normal sex, they can't procreate.

The entire point of evolution is to pass off traits to ones progeny. Homosexuals fail that test

 

[Timshel]

Forty odd years ago homosexuality was illegal, so I'm not sure what you mean by always?

I have a cousin that's over 40 years old whose father is gay. He is a good guy, very smart, not wildly successful but doing fine, got in a lot less trouble than most of the rest of us and he is still very close with his father. Homosexuals have ALWAYS been able to have kids.

 

[Timshel]

Please go back and read Post #65. I was very specific in what I posted and factually I am 100% correct.

Homosexuals can only procreate by engaging in coitus with the opposite sex at which point they aren't really homosexual then are they.

Either you believe in evolution or you don't. Evolution has biologically selected out homosexuality as a mutation because without engaging in normal sex, they can't procreate.

The entire point of evolution is to pass off traits to ones progeny. Homosexuals fail that test

You brought it up in post 46 and said...

You know I speak truth. Thousands of years of human experience say it is so. Evolution says it is so. Homosexuals were not meant to be parents, otherwise evolution would have allowed for it. You do believe in evolution don't you?

Evolution has not biologically selected out for homosexuals and they can procreate. There is no "point" to evolution. Again, not a conscious force. There is no will behind it. It just is.

Many if not most homsexuals have had sex with members of the opposite sex.

 

[cancel2 2022]

I have a cousin that's over 40 years old whose father is gay. He is a good guy, very smart, not wildly successful but doing fine, got in a lot less trouble than most of the rest of us and he is still very close with his father. Homosexuals have ALWAYS been able to have kids.

I thought we were talking about homosexual couples??