Their blood is on left wingers hands

This is, in fact, an inevitable result of our current society's ways. The same thing has happened over and over again across human history, from the fall of Babylonian Ur to the French Revolution.

What the right-wingers fail to understand is that in every one of these societies, the single uniting factor behind violence against the rich was absurd levels of income inequality brought about by the rich. If no one steps in to save them, there's going to be another revolution like the one in France -- only I don't think that America's poor are classy enough to use guillotines.

It's actually a classic Tragedy of the Commons: if rich people as a group get too far above the station of the common man, the common man can and will break the system, kill the rich, and redistribute the wealth themselves -- provably. But any one rich person is too self-interested for them as a group to get together and agree to dial it back. The only hope they have is that the government finds a way to crank that dial before the peasants do it by force.
 
Essence said:
This is, in fact, an inevitable result of our current society's ways. The same thing has happened over and over again across human history, from the fall of Babylonian Ur to the French Revolution.

What the right-wingers fail to understand is that in every one of these societies, the single uniting factor behind violence against the rich was absurd levels of income inequality brought about by the rich. If no one steps in to save them, there's going to be another revolution like the one in France -- only I don't think that America's poor are classy enough to use guillotines.

It's actually a classic Tragedy of the Commons: if rich people as a group get too far above the station of the common man, the common man can and will break the system, kill the rich, and redistribute the wealth themselves -- provably. But any one rich person is too self-interested for them as a group to get together and agree to dial it back. The only hope they have is that the government finds a way to crank that dial before the peasants do it by force.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that the gobblement needs to redistribute the wealth to save the lives of the rich? Hell,why didn't they say so?

Here is a thought experiment.

Let's say you could take all of the wealth of these United States and divide it perfectly among every citizen. I mean 100% equal.

What do you think it would look like a year later?
 
Depends. If you forgave all debt when you did the redistribution (as they generally do in these kinds of revolutions), it could take several generations to get back to pre-redistribution levels. If you don't, then yeah, maybe a year or four, but only because everyone currently holding any debt would immediately call it in to improve their financial standing, so the equality would last for all of a few milliseconds before the EFTs came flooding around.
 
A deranged man who allegedly butchered a family of five — including a one-year-old — with a meat cleaver Saturday night may have done so because the family was too wealthy.


A police source told the New York Post the man confessed to committing the crime because he was jealous of the family’s lifestyle.


“The family had too much,” a police source told The Post. “Their income [and] lifestyle was better than his.”


The unidentified man allegedly hacked to death the 37-year-old mom Qiao Zhen Li and her four young kids, aged 1, 5, 7 and 9.


The one-year-old was found at the scene decapitated, a police source told The Post.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/27/shock-report-man-butchered-family-because-their-income-was-too-high-they-had-too-much/
 
Big money said:
A deranged man who allegedly butchered a family of five — including a one-year-old — with a meat cleaver Saturday night may have done so because the family was too wealthy.


A police source told the New York Post the man confessed to committing the crime because he was jealous of the family’s lifestyle.


“The family had too much,” a police source told The Post. “Their income [and] lifestyle was better than his.”


The unidentified man allegedly hacked to death the 37-year-old mom Qiao Zhen Li and her four young kids, aged 1, 5, 7 and 9.


The one-year-old was found at the scene decapitated, a police source told The Post.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/27/shock-report-man-butchered-family-because-their-income-was-too-high-they-had-too-much/
Click to expand...
\

Yeah, the family had 'so much' they were allowing him to live with them, the husband was his cousin. One of those cases of 'no good deed goes unpunished.'

Sort of related in the sense that this aunt has little regards for life, just her own 'needs':

 
Annie said:
\

Yeah, the family had 'so much' they were allowing him to live with them, the husband was his cousin. One of those cases of 'no good deed goes unpunished.'

Sort of related in the sense that this aunt has little regards for life, just her own 'needs':

Click to expand...

Someone please put a bullet threw this stupid bitch aunt's head.
 
Essence said:
Depends. If you forgave all debt when you did the redistribution (as they generally do in these kinds of revolutions), it could take several generations to get back to pre-redistribution levels. If you don't, then yeah, maybe a year or four, but only because everyone currently holding any debt would immediately call it in to improve their financial standing, so the equality would last for all of a few milliseconds before the EFTs came flooding around.
Click to expand...

Fine forgive all of their debt too. Start from zero. Where do you think we would be in five years? ten years?
 
I'm still waiting for a real-life example of "the redistribution (as they generally do in these kinds of revolutions), it could take several generations to get back to pre-redistribution levels."


And what happens to a large number of lottery winners within just a few years?

Anybody?

Buehler?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top